Skip to main content

An Institution for Object-Z with Inheritance and Polymorphism

  • Chapter
Software, Services, and Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8950))

Abstract

Large software systems are best specified using a multi-paradigm approach. Depending on which aspects of a system one wants to model, some logic formalisms are better suited than others. The theory of institutions and (co)morphisms between institutions provides a general framework for describing logical systems and their connections. This is the foundation of multi-modelling languages allowing one to deal with heterogeneous specifications in a consistent way. To make Object-Z accessible as part of such a multi-modelling language, we define the institution OZS for Object-Z. We have chosen Object-Z in part because it is a prominent software modelling language and in part because it allows us to study the formalisation of object-oriented concepts, like object identity, object state, dynamic behaviour, polymorphic sorts and inheritance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language. Reference Manual, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mossakowski, T., Maeder, C., Codescu, M.: Hets user guide - verion 0.99. DKFI GmbH, Bremen, Germany (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mossakowski, T.: Heterogeneous specification and the heterogeneous tool set. Habilitation thesis, University of Bremen (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goguen, J.A., Burstall, R.M.: Introducing institutions. In: Clarke, E., Kozen, D. (eds.) Logic of Programs 1983. LNCS, vol. 164, pp. 221–256. Springer, Heidelberg (1984)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Burstall, R.M., Goguen, J.A.: The semantics of Clear, a specification language. In: Bjorner, D. (ed.) Abstract Software Specifications. LNCS, vol. 86, pp. 292–332. Springer, Heidelberg (1980)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Sannella, D., Tarlecki, A.: Specifications in an arbitrary institution. Information and Computation (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mosses, P.D. (ed.): CASL Reference Manual. LNCS, vol. 2960. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ehrig, H., Mahr, B.: Fundamentals of algebraic specification 1: Equations and initial semantics. Springer (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, D.R.: Composition by colimit and formal software development. In: Futatsugi, K., Jouannaud, J.-P., Meseguer, J. (eds.) Algebra, Meaning, and Computation. LNCS, vol. 4060, pp. 317–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, G.: The Object-Z specification language. Kluwer Academic Publisher (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spivey, J.M.: The Z Notation - A Reference manual. Prentice-Hall (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, S.-K., Carrington, D.: A formal mapping between UML models and object-Z specifications. In: Bowen, J.P., Dunne, S., Galloway, A., King, S. (eds.) B 2000, ZUM 2000, and ZB 2000. LNCS, vol. 1878, pp. 2–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Baumeister, H.: Relating abstract datatypes and Z-schemata. In: Bert, D., Choppy, C., Mosses, P.D. (eds.) WADT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1827, pp. 366–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Cengarle, M.V., Knapp, A.: An institution for UML 2.0 static structures. Technical Report TUM-10807, Technische Universität München (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cengarle, M.V., Knapp, A., Tarlecki, A., Wirsing, M.: A heterogeneous approach to UML semantics. In: Degano, P., De Nicola, R., Meseguer, J. (eds.) Concurrency, Graphs and Models. LNCS, vol. 5065, pp. 383–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Boronat, A., Knapp, A., Meseguer, J., Wirsing, M.: What is a multi-modeling language? In: Corradini, A., Montanari, U. (eds.) WADT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5486, pp. 71–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Baumeister, H.: Relations between Abstract Datatypes modeled as Abstract Datatypes. PhD thesis, University of Saarbrücken (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goguen, J.A., Meseguer, J.: Order-sorted algebra I: Equational deduction for multiple inheritance, overloading, exceptions and partial operations. Theoretical Computer Science 105(2), 217–273 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Meseguer, J.: Membership algebra as a logical framework for equational specification. In: Parisi-Presicce, F. (ed.) WADT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1376, pp. 18–61. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Goguen, J.A., Burstall, R.M.: Institutions: Abstract model theory for specification and programming. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 39(1), 95–146 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Somerville, I.: Model-based specification (2000), http://www.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~ifs/Resources/Notes/FormalSpec/ModelSpec.pdf

  22. Baumeister, H., Bettaz, M., Maouche, M., Mosteghanemi, M.: Institutions for Object-Z — technical report (2014), http://people.compute.dtu.dk/huba/publications/OZReport.pdf

  23. Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the working mathematician, 2nd edn., vol. 5. Springer (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wen, Z., Miao, H., Zeng, H.: Generating proof obligation to verify Object-Z specification. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, pp. 38–38 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stevens, B.: Implementing Object-Z with Perfect Developer. Journal of Object Technology 5(2), 189–202 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Paige, R.F., Brooke, P.J.: Integrating BON and Object-Z. Journal of Object Technology 3(3), 121–141 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Codescu, M., Horozal, F., Jakubauskas, A., Mossakowski, T., Rabe, F.: Compiling logics. In: Martí-Oliet, N., Palomino, M. (eds.) WADT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7841, pp. 111–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baumeister, H., Bettaz, M., Maouche, M., Mosteghanemi, M. (2015). An Institution for Object-Z with Inheritance and Polymorphism. In: De Nicola, R., Hennicker, R. (eds) Software, Services, and Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8950. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15545-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15545-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15544-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15545-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics