Abstract
One of the most annoying problems in urban bus operations is bus bunching, which happens when two or more buses arrive at a stop nose to tail. Bus bunching reflects an unreliable service that affects transit operations by increasing passenger-waiting times. This work proposes a linear mathematical programming model that establishes bus holding times at certain stops along a transit corridor to avoid bus bunching. Our approach needs real-time input, so we simulate a transit corridor and apply our mathematical model to the data generated. Thus, the inherent variability of a transit system is considered by the simulation, while the optimization model takes into account the key variables and constraints of the bus operation. Our methodology reduces overall passenger-waiting times efficiently given our linear programming model, with the characteristic of applying control intervals just every 5 min.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The time interval is a parameter in our model that could be specified by the control unit of the bus company.
References
Bartholdi III JJ, Eisenstein DD (2012) A self-coördinating bus route to resist bus bunching. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46(4):481–491
Ceder A (2001) Bus timetables with even passenger loads as opposed to even headways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1760(1):3–9
Ceder A (2007) Public Transit Planning and Operation: Theory, Modeling and Practice. Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann
Daganzo CF (2009) A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: Systematic analysis and comparisons. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43(10):913–921
Daganzo CF, Pilachowski J (2011) Reducing bunching with bus-to-bus cooperation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45(1):267–277
Delgado F, Muñoz JC, Giesen R, Cipriano A (2009) Real-time control of buses in a transit corridor based on vehicle holding and boarding limits. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2090(1):59–67
Delgado F, Munoz JC, Giesen R (2012) How much can holding and/or limiting boarding improve transit performance? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46(9):1202–1217
Desaulniers G, Hickman M (2007) Public transit. Transportation, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science pp 69–127
Diamond B, Krahl D, Nastasi A, Tag P (2010) Extendsim advanced technology: integrated simulation database. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Winter Simulation Conference, pp 32–39
Ding Y, Chien SI (2001) Improving transit service quality and headway regularity with real-time control. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1760(1):161–170
Eberlein XJ, Wilson NH, Bernstein D (2001) The holding problem with real-time information available. Transportation science 35(1):1–18
Furth PG, Muller TH (2007) Service reliability and optimal running time schedules. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2034(1):55–61
Hickman MD (2001) An analytic stochastic model for the transit vehicle holding problem. Transportation Science 35(3):215–237
Ibarra-Rojas OJ, Rios-Solis YA (2012) Synchronization of bus timetabling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46(5):599–614
Ibarra-Rojas OJ, López-Irarragorri F, Rios-Solis YA (2015) Multiperiod synchronization bus timetabling. Transportation Science
Jolliffe J, Hutchinson T (1975) A behavioural explanation of the association between bus and passenger arrivals at a bus stop. Transportation Science 9(3):248–282
Krahl D (2009) Extendsim advanced technology: discrete rate simulation. In: Winter Simulation Conference, Winter Simulation Conference, pp 333–338
Puong A, Wilson NH (2008) A train holding model for urban rail transit systems. In: Computer-aided Systems in Public Transport, Springer, pp 319–337
Ríos-Mercado RZ, Ríos-Solís YA (2012) Just-in-time Systems, vol 60. Springer
Rios-Solis YA (2008) Scheduling with earliness-tardiness penalties and parallel machines. 4OR 6(2):191–194
Rios-Solis YA, Sourd F (2008) Exponential neighborhood search for a parallel machine scheduling problem. Computers & Operations Research 35(5):1697–1712
Sourd F, Kedad-Sidhoum S (2003) The one-machine problem with earliness and tardiness penalties. Journal of Scheduling 6(6):533–549
Sun A, Hickman M (2008) The holding problem at multiple holding stations. In: Computer-aided systems in public transport, Springer, pp 339–359
Zhao J, Bukkapatnam S, Dessouky MM (2003) Distributed architecture for real-time coordination of bus holding in transit networks. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on 4(1):43–51
Zolfaghari S, Azizi N, Jaber MY (2004) A model for holding strategy in public transit systems with real-time information. International Journal of Transport Management 2(2):99–110
Acknowledgments
L.G. Hernández-Landa and M.L. Morales-Marroquín wish to thank the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT) for graduate scholarship support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hernández-Landa, L.G., Morales-Marroquín, M.L., Nigenda, R.S., Ríos-Solís, Y.Á. (2015). Linear Bus Holding Model for Real-Time Traffic Network Control. In: Mujica Mota, M., De La Mota, I., Guimarans Serrano, D. (eds) Applied Simulation and Optimization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15033-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15033-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15032-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15033-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)