Skip to main content

Experiences in System-of-Systems-Wide Architecture Evaluation over Multiple Product Lines

  • Conference paper
Software Reuse for Dynamic Systems in the Cloud and Beyond (ICSR 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8919))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1103 Accesses

Abstract

Software architecture evaluation, both for software products and software product lines, has become a mainstream activity in industry. Significant amount of practical experience exists in applying architecture evaluation in real projects. However, most of the methods and practices focus on evaluating individual products or product lines. In this paper, we study how to evaluate a system-of-systems consisting of several cooperating software product lines. In particular, the intent is to evaluate the system-of-systems-wide architecture for the ability to satisfy a new set of crosscutting requirements. We describe the experiences and practices of performing a system-of-systems-wide architecture evaluation in industry: the system-of-systems in question is a set of product lines whose products are used to create the All-IP 3G telecommunications network. The results indicate there are significant differences in evaluating the architecture of system-of-systems compared with traditional evaluations targeting single systems. The two main differences affecting architecture evaluation were the heterogeneity in the maturity levels of the individual systems, i.e., product lines, and the option that instead of simply evaluating each product line individually, responsibilities can be moved from one product line to another to satisfy the system-of-systems level requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lindvall, M., Tvedt, R.T., Costa, P.: An empirically-based process for software architecture evaluation. Empirical Software Engineering 8(1), 83–108 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Svahnberg, M.: An industrial study on building consensus around software architectures and quality attributes. Information and Software Technology (46), 818–850 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hofmeister, C., Nord, R., Soni, D.: Applied Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clements, P., Kazman, R., Klein, M.: Evaluating Software Architectures—Methods and Case Studies. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nord, R., Tomayko, J.: Software architecture-centric methods and agile development. IEEE Software (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tyree, J., Akerman, A., Financial, C.: Architecture decisions: Demystifying architecture. IEEE Software (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives. Addison-Wesley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Savolainen, J., Männistö, T.: Conflict-Centric Software Architectural Views: Exposing Trade-Offs in Quality Requirements. IEEE Software 27(6), 33–37 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Svahnberg, M., Wohlin, C., Lundberg, L., Mattsson, M.: A method for understanding quality attributes in software architecture structures. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2002), pp. 819–826. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hillard, R., Kurland, M., Litvintchouk, S., Rice, T., Schwarm, S.: Architecture Quality Assessment, version 2.0, MITRE Corporation (August 7, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Etxeberria, L., Sagardui, G.: Product-line architecture: New issues for evaluation. In: Obbink, H., Pohl, K. (eds.) SPLC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3714, pp. 174–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Olumofin, F.G., Mišić, V.B.: A holistic architecture assessment method for software product lines. Information and Software Technology 49(4), 309–323 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 14(2), 131–164 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Myllärniemi, V., Savolainen, J., Männistö, T.: Performance variability in software product lines: A case study in the telecommunication domain. In: Software Product Line Conference, pp. 32–41 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Savolainen, J., Männistö, T., Myllärniemi, V. (2014). Experiences in System-of-Systems-Wide Architecture Evaluation over Multiple Product Lines. In: Schaefer, I., Stamelos, I. (eds) Software Reuse for Dynamic Systems in the Cloud and Beyond. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8919. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14130-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14130-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14129-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14130-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics