Skip to main content

History of Labor Pain Relief

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Epidural Labor Analgesia
  • 1699 Accesses

Abstract

History of labor has always fluctuated between the private and the public, the natural and the artificial. Well up to the eighteenth century, the preparation and attendance of birth was essentially considered a women’s affair from which males were almost always excluded. As late as 1552, a German physician was publicly branded for having attended as a midwife in a female garb, and still in the early nineteenth century, many obstetricians lamented that during what they called “the dark ages,” the care of women in childbed appertained exclusively to the female sex, especially to those of them who had acquired a certain experience in accouchement and were therefore invested of a certain authority [1]. Angélique du Coudray, the enlightened midwife who employed an anatomical model for surgical demonstrations, was one of the most famous [2].

This text has profited from funds from the Spanish Ministry of Economy (FFI2010-20876:Epistemología Histórica: Historia de las emociones en los siglos XIX y XX). It was written while I was Visiting Professor at the Centre for the Humanities at Washington University in St. Louis, MO. I am very grateful to her Director, Jean Allman, and to all those who made that visit possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Dionis, Traité général des accouchemens, Paris, Charles-Maurice d'Houry, 1718, pp. 124 and 152.

  2. 2.

    Cazeaux, Traité, theórique et pratique de l'art des accouchements, Paris, F. Chamerot, 1858, p. 418.

  3. 3.

    See [21], pp. 414–432.

  4. 4.

    Simpson, On the Early History of Anaesthetic Midwifery, Edinburg, 1848, p. 11.

  5. 5.

    Simpson, History, p. 43.

  6. 6.

    Meigs, Obstetrics, the Science and the Art, Philadelphia, Blanchard and Lea, 1849, p. 316.

  7. 7.

    See [30], p. 126.

  8. 8.

    See [30], p. 141.

  9. 9.

    Williams, Women and Childbirth in the Twentieth Century. A History of the National Birthday Trust Fund 1928–1993, Stroud, Sutton Publishing, 1997, p. 146.

  10. 10.

    See [32], p. 124.

  11. 11.

    See [32], p. 128–129.

References

  1. Tyler Smith WM (1868) A course of lectures of obstetrics—with an introductory lecture on the history of the art of midwifery, by Augustus K. Gardner, 3rd edn. Robert M. De Witt, New York, p 27

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gelbart NR (1998) The king’s midwife. A history and mystery of Madame du Coudray. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson A (1985) Participant or patient? Seventeenth century childbirth from the mother’s point of view. In: Porter R (ed) Patients and practitioners. Lay perceptions of medicine in pre-industrial society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 129–145, 134

    Google Scholar 

  4. Park K (2006) Secrets of women. Gender, generation and the origins of human dissection. Zone Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shorter W (1985) The management of the normal deliveries and the generation of William Hunter. In: Bynum WF, Porter R (eds) William Hunter and the eighteenth century medical world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 371–383

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adrian Wilson (2002) William Hunter and the varieties of man-midwifery. In: Bynum WF, Porter R (eds) William Hunter and the Eighteenth-Century Medical World, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp 323–343

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson A (1995) The making of man-midwifery. Childbirth in England 1660–1770. UCL Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin E (1987) The woman in the body. A cultural analysis of reproduction. Beacon Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gelis J (1991) History of childbirth. Polity Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 150

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maygrier JP (1841) Midwifery illustrated. Harper & Brothers, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stolberg M (2000) The monthly malady: a history of premenstrual suffering. Med Hist 44:301–322

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moscoso J (2012) Pain: a cultural history. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Simpson JY (1848) On the early history and progress of Anaesthetic midwifery. Edinburg, 1846, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raper HR (1947) Man against pain. The epic of anaesthesia. Victor Gollancz, London, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson A (1993) The perils of early-modern procreation: childbirth with or without fear? Br J 18th Cent Stud 16:1–19, p 3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Exton B (1751) A new and general system of midwifery. In four parts. W. Owen, London, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dionis P (1724) Traité général des accouchements, qui instruit de tout ce qu'il faut faire pour être habile accoucheur [1718]. C.M. d’Houry, Paris, p 209

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laurent S (1989) Naître au moyen age. De la conception a la naissance: la grossesse et l’accouchement. xii-xv. Le léopard d’or, Paris, pp 186–198

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amanda Carson Banks (1999) Birth chairs, midwives and medicine. University Press of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, p 35

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jewett C (ed) (1899) The practice of obstetrics. p 201

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cazeaux P (1853) Traité théorique et pratique de l’art des accouchements [1840]. Chamerot, Paris, p 430

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chapman A (1753) Treatise of the improvement of midwifery. p xxxii

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams W (1903) Obstetrics. A text book for the use of students and practitioners. Appleton and Company, New York, NY, p 197

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chapman A (1753) Treatise of the improvement of midwifery, chiefly with regard to the operation. John Brindely, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simpson JY (1848) On the early history and progress of anaesthetic midwifery. Edinburgh, 1846, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  26. King H (2007) Midwifery, obstetrics and the rise of gynaecology. The uses of a sixteenth-century compendium. Ashgate, Aldershot, p 183

    Google Scholar 

  27. Merriman SWJ (1848) Arguments against the indiscriminatory employment of chloroform in midwifery. Churchill, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ramsbotham FH (1842) The principles and practices of obstetric medicine and surgery, in reference to the process of parturition illustrated by one hundred and forty-two figures. Lea and Blanchard, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leavitt JW (1986) Brought to bed. Childbearing in America, 1750–1950. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Williams S (1997) Women and childbirth in the twentieth century. A history of the National Trust Fund 1928–1993. Sutton Publishing, Stroud, p 125

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cheynier JM (1981) Douleur, souffrance, violence. Les Dossiers de l’Obstétrique, special number, La Douleur 73:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  32. Williams (1903) Obstetrics. p 294

    Google Scholar 

  33. Flint A (1925) Responsibility of the medical profession in further reducing maternal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 19:864–866 (Quoted by Caton, What a Blessing, p 157)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rosenberg C (1987) The care of the strangers: the rise of America’s hospital system. Basic Books, New York, NY, pp 206–236

    Google Scholar 

Suggested Reading

  1. Kay MA (1982) Anthropology of human birth. F.A. Davis, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beauvalet-Boutouyrie S (1999) Naître à l’hôpital au XIXè siècle. Belin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carson A (1999) Banks, birth chairs, midwives and medicine. University Press of Mississippi, Jackson, MS

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caton D (1999) What a blessing she had chloroform! The medical and social response to the pain of childbirth from 1800 to the present. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chatti S (2006) Les couches royales sous l’Ancien Régime: l’étiquette obstétricale, réalisé sous la direction de monsieur le professeur Paul Vert, Nancy

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gelis J (1984) L’arbre et le fruit: la naissance dans l’Occident moderne (XVI-XIX siècles). Fayard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gelis J (1988) La sage femme ou le médecin. Fayard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gélis J, Morel M-F (1978) Entrer dans la vie: naissances et enfances dans la France traditionnelle. Gallimard-Julliard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanson C (2004) A cultural history of pregnancy. Pregnancy, medicine and culture, 1750–2000. Palgrave MacMillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Knibiehler Y (2007) Accoucher: femmes, sages-femmes et médecins depuis le milieu du XXe siècle. Rennes, Éd. de l’École nationale de la santé publique

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laget M (1982) Naissances: l’accouchement avant l’âge de la clinique. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martin E (1987) The woman in the body. A cultural analysis of reproduction. Beacon Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moscoso J (2012) Pain: a cultural history. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Nivet V (1879) Notice historique sur Madame Du Coudray, maîtresse sage-femme à Clermont-Ferrand en 1756. F. Thibaud, Clermont-Ferrand

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sandelowski M (1984) Pain. Pleasure and American childbirth. From the twilight sleep to the read method, 1914–1960. Greenwood, Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tardieu N (2004) Grossesse et sexualité à travers l’Histoire. Connaissances et savoirs, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas M (ed) (1997) Post-war mothers. Childbirth letters to Grantly Dick-Read, 1946–1956. University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leavitt JW (1986) Brouth to bed. Childbearing in America, 1750–1950. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams JW (1903) Obstetrics. A text book for the use of students and practioners. Appleton and Company, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Moscoso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moscoso, J. (2015). History of Labor Pain Relief. In: Capogna, G. (eds) Epidural Labor Analgesia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13890-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13890-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13889-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13890-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics