Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neuraxial Analgesia: Technical Problems and Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Epidural Labor Analgesia

  • 1634 Accesses

Abstract

Epidural analgesia is considered the most effective method of pain relief during labor. Advances, in both drugs and equipment, have meant a great improvement in its safety and effectiveness. However, epidural analgesia may fail in its main objective, which is to provide effective analgesia or anesthesia and some of these failures are due to technical problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P (2012) Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth 109:144–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Birnbach DJ, Ranasinghe JS (2008) Anesthesia complications in the birthplace: is the neuraxial block always to blame? Clin Perinatol 35:35–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eappen S, Blinn A, Segal S (1998) Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: a retrospective chart review. Int J Obstet Anesth 7:220–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Polley L, Columb MO, Naughton N et al (2002) Effect of epinephrine on the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural bupivacaine in labor. Anesthesiology 96:1123–1128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Columb MO, Lyons G (1995) Determination of minimum local anaesthetic concentration of epidural bupivacaine and lidocaine in labor. Anesth Analg 81:833–837

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paech MJ, Godkin R, Webster S (1998) Complications of obstetric epidural analgesia and anesthesia: a prospective analysis of 10,995 cases. Int J Obstet Anesth 7:5–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beilin Y, Bernstein H, Zucker-Pinchoff B (1995) The optimal distance that a multiorifice epidural catheter should be threaded into the epidural space. Anesth Analg 81:301–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD (2004) Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetrical neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 13:227–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Crawford JS (1972) The second thousand epidural blocks in an obstetric hospital practice. Br J Anaesth 44:1277–1286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Agaram R, Douglas MJ, McTaggart RA et al (2009) Inadequate pain relief with labor epidurals: a multivariate analysis of associated factors. Int J Obstet Anesth 18:10–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee RA, van Zundert AA, Botha CP et al (2010) The anatomy of the thoracic spinal canal in different postures: a magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 35:364–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coppejans HC, Hendrickx E, Goossens J et al (2006) The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal–epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension. Anesth Analg 102:243–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bahar M, Chanimov M, Cohen ML (2004) The lateral recumbent head-down position decreases the incidence of epidural venous puncture during catheter insertion in obese parturients. Can J Anaesth 51:577–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffin RM, Forum SRP (1984) A comparison between the midline and paramedian approaches to the extradural space. Anaesthesia 39:584–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Podder S, Kumar N, Yaddanapudi LN, Chari P (2004) Paramedian lumbar epidural catheter insertion with patients in the sitting position is equally successful in the flexed and unflexed spine. Anesth Analg 99:1829–1832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beilin Y, Arnold I, Telfeyan C et al (2000) Quality of analgesia when air versus saline is used for identification of the epidural space in the parturient. Reg Anesth Pain Med 25:596–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schier R, Guerra D, Aguilar J et al (2009) Epidural space identification: a meta-analysis of complications after air versus liquid as the medium for loss of resistance. Anesth Analg 109:2012–2021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Balki M, Lee Y, Halpern S, Carvalho JC (2009) Ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in the transverse plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space in obese parturients. Anesth Analg 108:1876–1881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clark MX, O’Hare K, Gorringe J, Oh T (2001) The effect of the Lockit epidural catheter clamp on epidural migration: a controlled trial. Anaesthesia 56:865–870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morrison LMM, Buchan AS (1990) Comparison of complications associated with single-holed and multiholed extradural catheters. Br J Anaesth 64:183–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin CC (2003) Air-locked epidural filter. Anesthesiology 99:515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miro M, Guasch E, Gilsanz F (2008) Comparison of epidural analgesia with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: a retrospective study of 6497 cases. Int J Obstet Anesth 17:15–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beilin Y, Zahn J, Bernstein H et al (1998) Treatment of incomplete analgesia after placement of an epidural catheter and administration of local anesthetic for women in labor. Anesthesiology 88:1502–1506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong C (2009) Epidural and spinal analgesia/anesthesia for labor and vaginal delivery. In: Chestnut’s obstetric anesthesia principles and practice. Mosby-Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, pp 430–492

    Google Scholar 

  25. Orbach-Zinger S, Avramovich A, Ilgiaeva N et al (2006) Risk factors for failure to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50:1014–1018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vallejo MC, Phelps AL, Singh S, Orebaugh SL, Sah N (2010) Ultrasound decreases the failed labor epidural rate in resident trainees. Int J Obstet Anesth 19:373–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Capogna G, Stirparo S (2013) Techniques for the maintenance of epidural labour analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 26:261–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Collier CB (1996) Why obstetric epidurals fail: a study of epidurograms. Int J Obstet Anesth 5:19–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamilton CL, Riley E, Cohen S (1997) Changes in the position of epidural catheters associated with patient movement. Anesthesiology 86:778–784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Blomberg R (1986) The dorsomedian connective tissueband in the lumbar epidural space of humans. An anatomical study using epiduroscopy in autoscopy cases. Anesth Analg 65:747–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Asato F, Goto F (1996) Radiographic findings of unilateral epidural block. Anesth Analg 83:519–522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Heesen M, Van de Velde M, Klöhr S et al (2014) Meta-analysis of the success of block following combined spinal-epidural vs epidural analgesia during labour. Anaesthesia 69:64–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Scott DB, Tunstall ME (1995) Serious complications associated with epidural/spinal blockade in obstetrics: a two-year prospective study. Int J Obstet Anesth 4:133–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jenkins JG (2005) Some immediate serious complications of obstetric epidural analgesia and anaesthesia: a prospective study of 145,550 epidurals. Int J Obstet Anesth 14:37–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Collier CB (2003) Accidental subdural injection during obstetric epidural block, it’s commoner than you think! Epidurogram evidence. Int J Obstet Anesth 12:201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Collier C (1982) Total spinal or massive subdural block? Anaesth Intensive Care 10:92–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lubenow T, Keh-Wong E, Kristof K et al (1988) Inadvertent subdural injection: a complication of an epidural block. Anesth Analg 67:175–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoftman N, Ferrante M (2009) Diagnosis of unintentional subdural anesthesia/analgesia: analyzing radiographically proven cases to define the clinical entity and to develop a diagnostic algorithm. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34:12–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hess PE, Pratt SD, Lucas TP et al (2001) Predictors of breakthrough pain during labor epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 93:414–418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Loubert C, Hinova A, Fernando R (2011) Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years. Anaesthesia 66:191–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. van der Vyver M, Halpern S, Joseph G (2002) Patient controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusión for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 89:459–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hawkins JL, Arens JF, Bucklin BA et al (2007) Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American society of anesthesiologists task force on obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology 106:843–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hogan Q (2002) Distribution of solution in the epidural space: examination by cryomicrotome section. Reg Anesth Pain Med 27:150–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT et al (2006) A randomised comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusión for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 102:904–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Halpern SH, Carvalho B (2009) Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor. Anesth Analg 108:921–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stratmann G, Gambling DR, Moeller-Bertram T et al (2005) A randomized comparison of a five-minute versus fifteen-minute lockout interval for PCEA during labor. Int J Obstet Anesth 14:200–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo CE (2006) Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a preliminary study on a novel approach of providing pain relief in labour. Singapore Med J 47:951–956

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sng BL, Sia AT, Lim Y et al (2009) Comparison of computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia with a basal infusion for labour and delivery. Anaesth Intensive Care 37:46–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Capogna G, Celleno D, Lyons G, Columb M, Fusco P (1998) Minimum local analgesic concentration of extradural bupivacaine increases with progression of labour. Br J Anaesth 80:11–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chua SM, Sia AT (2004) Automated intermittent epidural boluses improve analgesia induced by intrathecal fentanyl during labour. Can J Anaesth 51:581–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Goodman SR, Smiley RM, Negron MA et al (2009) A randomized trial of break-through pain during combined spinal-epidural versus epidural labor analgesia in parous women. Anesth Analg 108:246–251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Boogmans T, Vertommen J, Valkenborgh T et al (2014) Epidural neostigmine and clonidine improves the quality of combined spinal epidural analgesia in labour: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 31:190–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario La Paz, P° Castellana, 261, Madrid, 28046, Spain

    Emilia Guasch, Fernando Gilsanz & Azahara Sancho de Ávila

Authors
  1. Emilia Guasch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando Gilsanz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Azahara Sancho de Ávila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilia Guasch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Anesthesiolgy, Città di Roma Hospital, Rome, Italy

    Giorgio Capogna

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guasch, E., Gilsanz, F., de Ávila, A.S. (2015). Neuraxial Analgesia: Technical Problems and Solutions. In: Capogna, G. (eds) Epidural Labor Analgesia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13890-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13890-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13889-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13890-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation