Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Essentials in Cytopathology ((EICP,volume 25))

  • 809 Accesses

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound provides access for tissue sampling of lesions that would otherwise be difficult or impossible to sample percutaneously. The roles of the endosonographer and cytopathologist, including brief description of echoendoscopes, use of appropriate needle type and caliber, number of passes, and handling and triaging of sample, are described. The cytology of normal gut wall elements as a result of needle contamination at the time of sampling, the value of on-site cytologic interpretation that allows assessment of cytologic adequacy and preliminary diagnosis that prompts the submission of material for ancillary tests and/or changes in needle type, caliber or sampling of additional lesions, and the good communication between the endosonographer and cytopathologist are described and emphasized. The aspiration technique of solid and cystic masses is extensively covered. Appropriate images complement the text.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Further Reading

  • Alsohaibani F, Girgis S, et al. Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy? Can J Gastroenterol. 2009;23(1):26–30.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bardales RH, Stelow EB, et al. Review of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34(2):140–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berzosa M, Davies SF, et al. Diagnostic bedside EUS in the intensive care unit: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(2):200–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cermak TS, Wang B, et al. Does on-site adequacy evaluation reduce the nondiagnostic rate in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions? Cancer Cytopathol. 2012;120(5):319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Chak A. Endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2004;36(1):17–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eltoum IA, Chhieng DC, et al. Cumulative sum procedure in evaluation of EUS-guided FNA cytology: the learning curve and diagnostic performance beyond sensitivity and specificity. Cytopathology. 2007;18(3):143–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jhala NC, Jhala DN, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. a cytopathologist’s perspective. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120(3):351–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59(4):475–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JK, Choi ER, et al. A prospective comparison of liquid-based cytology and traditional smear cytology in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol. 2011;55(5):401–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mertz H, Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59(1):33–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui MT, Gokaslan ST, et al. Split sample comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided pancreatic fine-needle aspirations. Diagn Cytopathol. 2005;32(2):70–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skov BG, Baandrup U, et al. Cytopathologic diagnoses of fine-needle aspirations from endoscopic ultrasound of the mediastinum: reproducibility of the diagnoses and representativeness of aspirates from lymph nodes. Cancer. 2007;111(4):234–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stelow EB, Bardales RH, et al. Pitfalls in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and how to avoid them. Adv Anat Pathol. 2005;12(2):62–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, et al. Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2004;36(5):397–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wani S, Cote GA, et al. Learning curves for EUS by using cumulative sum analysis: implications for American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(4):558–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo H. Bardales MD, MIAC, ECNU .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bardales, R., De Las Casas, L., Nawras, A., Mallery, S. (2015). Technical Considerations of EUS and EUS-FNA. In: Bardales, R. (eds) Cytology of the Mediastinum and Gut Via Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration. Essentials in Cytopathology, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12796-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12796-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12795-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12796-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics