Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound provides access for tissue sampling of lesions that would otherwise be difficult or impossible to sample percutaneously. The roles of the endosonographer and cytopathologist, including brief description of echoendoscopes, use of appropriate needle type and caliber, number of passes, and handling and triaging of sample, are described. The cytology of normal gut wall elements as a result of needle contamination at the time of sampling, the value of on-site cytologic interpretation that allows assessment of cytologic adequacy and preliminary diagnosis that prompts the submission of material for ancillary tests and/or changes in needle type, caliber or sampling of additional lesions, and the good communication between the endosonographer and cytopathologist are described and emphasized. The aspiration technique of solid and cystic masses is extensively covered. Appropriate images complement the text.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Further Reading
Alsohaibani F, Girgis S, et al. Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy? Can J Gastroenterol. 2009;23(1):26–30.
Bardales RH, Stelow EB, et al. Review of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34(2):140–75.
Berzosa M, Davies SF, et al. Diagnostic bedside EUS in the intensive care unit: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(2):200–8.
Cermak TS, Wang B, et al. Does on-site adequacy evaluation reduce the nondiagnostic rate in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions? Cancer Cytopathol. 2012;120(5):319–25.
Das A, Chak A. Endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2004;36(1):17–22.
Eltoum IA, Chhieng DC, et al. Cumulative sum procedure in evaluation of EUS-guided FNA cytology: the learning curve and diagnostic performance beyond sensitivity and specificity. Cytopathology. 2007;18(3):143–50.
Jhala NC, Jhala DN, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. a cytopathologist’s perspective. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120(3):351–67.
LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59(4):475–81.
Lee JK, Choi ER, et al. A prospective comparison of liquid-based cytology and traditional smear cytology in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol. 2011;55(5):401–7.
Mertz H, Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59(1):33–7.
Siddiqui MT, Gokaslan ST, et al. Split sample comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided pancreatic fine-needle aspirations. Diagn Cytopathol. 2005;32(2):70–5.
Skov BG, Baandrup U, et al. Cytopathologic diagnoses of fine-needle aspirations from endoscopic ultrasound of the mediastinum: reproducibility of the diagnoses and representativeness of aspirates from lymph nodes. Cancer. 2007;111(4):234–41.
Stelow EB, Bardales RH, et al. Pitfalls in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and how to avoid them. Adv Anat Pathol. 2005;12(2):62–73.
Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, et al. Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2004;36(5):397–401.
Wani S, Cote GA, et al. Learning curves for EUS by using cumulative sum analysis: implications for American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(4):558–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bardales, R., De Las Casas, L., Nawras, A., Mallery, S. (2015). Technical Considerations of EUS and EUS-FNA. In: Bardales, R. (eds) Cytology of the Mediastinum and Gut Via Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration. Essentials in Cytopathology, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12796-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12796-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12795-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12796-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)