Skip to main content

Interaction of Photons and Charged Particles with Matter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intermediate Physics for Medicine and Biology
  • 128k Accesses

Abstract

An x-ray image records variations in the passage of x rays through the body because of scattering and absorption. This chapter describes the mechanism by which x-rays and charged particles interact with tissue. Photons interact by several mechanisms, including the photoelectric effect, Compton scattering, and pair production. Other processes can lead to the transfer of energy between photons and electrons, such as the production of Auger electrons, bremsstrahlung radiation, and emission of fluorescence photons. The interaction of tissue with charged particles is described by their range and stopping power, and they often deposit most of their energy near the end of their path in the Bragg peak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Since this is one of the few relativistic results we will need, it is not developed here. A discussion can be found in any book on special relativity.

  2. 2.

    The atomic weight is potentially confusing. Sometimes \(A\) has no units (as in labeling an nuclear isotope), sometimes it is in grams per mole, and sometimes it is in kilograms per mole).

  3. 3.

    This distinction between photons and charged particles represents two extremes on a continuum, and we must be careful not to adhere to the distinction too rigidly. A photon may be coherently scattered through a small angle with no loss of energy, while a charged particle may occasionally lose so much energy that it can no longer be followed.

  4. 4.

    A value \(\beta =0.04\) corresponds to a kinetic energy of 400 eV for electrons, 800 keV for protons, and 3.2 MeV for \(\alpha \) particles.

  5. 5.

    Classically, if the electrons go around the nucleus many times while the projectile moves by, the shape of their orbits can change in response to the projectile. Quantum mechanically, the shape of the wave function can change, but the quantum numbers do not change.

  6. 6.

    This difference can be understood classically. In the first approximation, the radiation by a charge is proportional to the product of the charge times its acceleration, \(qa\). For two interacting electrons, \(a_{1}=-a_{2}\), \(q_{1}=q_{2}\), and the sum of these two terms vanishes. For an electron and a positron \(a_{1}=-a_{2}\), \(q_{1}=-q_{2}\), and the two terms add.

  7. 7.

    A plasmon excitation is due to the interaction of the projectile with the entire electron cloud of the atom.

  8. 8.

    The electron density functions are calculated using quantum mechanics. The problem is to find the electron distribution by solving Schrödinger’s equation with the potential distribution due to the nucleus and the potential due to the electron charge distribution for which one is solving. This self-consistent computation is called the Hartree–Fock approximation.

  9. 9.

    \(I\) is not the same as the average ionization energy of Eq. 15.57.

  10. 10.

    The solid line representing the integrand does not fall to zero at 0.12 nm\({}=1.2~\operatorname {\text {\AA }}\) because of the effect of electrons from neighboring atoms. In a solid there are no regions where the electron density is zero.

  11. 11.

    The literature often replaces the \(4\pi \) by \(2\pi \) for electrons and makes \(L\) twice as large.

  12. 12.

    These examples were constructed with a pedagogical simulation program called MacDose (Hobbie 1992). The program is available at the book web site: www.oakland.edu/~roth/hobbie.htm. It runs on a Macintosh using OS-9 or earlier. There is also a 26-min video using MacDose that shows the concepts here in more detail (Hobbie 2009). It is free and available through iTunes. A more realistic but easily understood Monte Carlo simulation is described by Arqueros and Montesinos (2003).

  13. 13.

    See ICRU Report 33 (1980) or Attix (1986).

  14. 14.

    Neutrinos, which we will discuss in Chap. 17, travel such long distances without interacting that they are not considered in the calculations. Energy carried by neutrinos, which come from nuclear \(\beta \) decay, is assumed to have left the body.

References

  • Ahlen SP (1980) Theoretical and experimental aspects of the energy loss of relativistic heavily ionizing particles. Rev Mod Phys 52:121–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Arqueros F, Montesinos GD (2003) A simple algorithm for the transport of gamma rays in a medium. Am J Phys 71(1):38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Attix FH (1986) Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambynek W, Crasemann B, Fink RW, Freund HU, Mark H, Swift CD, Price RE, Rao PV (1972) X-ray fluorescence yields, Auger, and Coster–Kronig transition probabilities. Rev Mod Phys 44:716–813

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone JM, Chavez AE (1996) Comparison of x-ray cross sections for diagnostic and therapeutic medical physics. Med Phys 23(12):1997–2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd T, Marshall M (1983) Microdosimetric properties of electron tracks measured in a low-pressure chamber. Radiat Res 93:19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson GA, Carlsson CA, Berggren K-F, Ribberfors R (1982) Calculation of scattering cross sections for increased accuracy in diagnostic radiology. 1. Energy broadening of Compton-scattered photons. Med Phys 9(6):868–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie RK (1992) MacDose: a simulation for understanding radiological physics. Comput Phys 6(4):355–359 (MacDose is available at the book web site https://files.oakland.edu/users/roth/web/hobbie.htm https://files.oakland.edu/users/ https://files.oakland.edu/users/roth/web/hobbie.htm. It runs on a Macintosh computer using OS-9 or earlier)

  • Hobbie RK (2009) Photon interactions: a simulation study with MacDose. 26 minute video. https://itunes.apple.com/us/itunes-u/photon-interactions-simulation/id448438300?mt=10

  • Hubbell JH (1969) Photon cross sections, attenuation coefficients, and energy absorption coefficients from 10 keV to 100 GeV. NBS 29. US Govt. Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell JH (1982) Photon mass attenuation and energy absorption coefficients. Int J Appl Radiat Inst 33:1269–1290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-708X(82)90248-4

  • Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM (1996) Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements \(Z=1\)//www.nist.gov/pml/data/xraycoef/index.cfm

  • Hubbell JH, Veigele WJ, Briggs EA, Brown RT, Cromer DT, Howerton RJ (1975) Atomic form factors, incoherent scattering functions and photon scattering cross sections. J Phys Chem Ref Data 4:471–538 (errata ibid. 6:615–616 (1977))

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell JH, Gimm HA, Øverbø I (1980) Pair, triplet and total atomic cross sections (and mass attenuation coefficients) for 1 MeV–100 GeV photons in elements \(Z=1\)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell JH, Trehan PN, Singh N, Chand B, Mehta D, Garg ML, Garg RR, Singh S, Puri S (1994) A review, bibliography, and tabulation of \(K\) \(L\)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRU Report 16 (1970) Linear energy transfer. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRU Report 33 (1980) Radiation quantities and units. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRU Report 37 (1984) Stopping powers for electrons and positrons. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda. http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/radiation.cfm

  • ICRU Report 49 (1993) Stopping power and ranges for protons and alpha particles. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda. http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/star/index.cfm http://www.nist.gov/

  • Jackson JD (1999) Classical electrodynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DF, Hawkes DJ (1981) X-ray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures. Phys Rep 70:169–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissel LH, Pratt RH, Roy SC (1980) Rayleigh scattering by neutral atoms, 100 eV to 10 MeV. Phys Rev A 22:1970–2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell CF, Fowler PH, Perkins DH (1959) The study of elementary particles by the photographic method. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer SM (1993) Calculation of photon mass energy-transfer and mass energy-absorption coefficients. Radiat Res 136:147–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung CJ, Ashley JC, Ritchie RH (1979) Range of low-energy electrons in solids. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci NS-26:4874–4878

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler JF, Manoyan JM (1988) The stopping of ions in compounds. Nucl Instrum Meth B B35:215–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler JF, Biersack JP, Littmark U (1985) The stopping and range of ions in solids. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell K. Hobbie .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hobbie, R., Roth, B. (2015). Interaction of Photons and Charged Particles with Matter. In: Intermediate Physics for Medicine and Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12682-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics