Skip to main content

Towards the Computation of a Nash Equilibrium

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2014 (ISNN 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8866))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4191 Accesses

Abstract

Game theory has played a progressively more noticeable and important role in computer science topics, such as artificial intelligence, computer networking, and distributed computing, in recent years. In this paper, we provide a preliminary review of where efforts on this topic have been focused over the past several decades and find that currently, the most remarkable interface between algorithmic game theory and theoretical computer science is the computational complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Daskalakis, C., Goldberg, P.W., Papadimitriou, C.H.: The Complexity of Computing a Nash Equilibrium. Communications of the ACM 52(2), 89–97 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nash, J.: Non-Cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics 2(2), 286–295 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Lichtenstein, D., Sipser, M.: GO Is Polynomial-Space Hard. Journal of the ACM 27(2), 393–401 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Stockmeyer, L.J., Meyer, A.R.: Word problems requiring exponential time (Preliminary Report). In: 5th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 1–9. ACM (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conitzer, V., Sandholm, T.: New complexity results about Nash equilibria. Games and Economic Behavior 63(2), 621–641 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Papadimitriou, C.: Algorithms, games, and the internet. In: 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 749–753 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luce, R.D., Raiffa, H.: Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. Dover Publications (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chu, F., Halpern, J.: On the NP-completeness of finding an optimal strategy in games with common payoffs. International J. of Game Theory 30(1), 99–106 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilboa, I., Zemel, E.: Nash and correlated equilibria: Some complexity considerations. Games and Economic Behavior 1(1), 80–93 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ben-porath, E.: The complexity of computing a best response automaton in repeated games with mixed strategies. Games and Eco. Behavior 2(1), 1–12 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Koller, D., Megiddo, N.: The complexity of two-person zero-sum games in extensive form. Games and Economic Behavior 4(4), 528–552 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Littman, M.L., Stone, P.: A polynomial-time nash equilibrium algorithm for repeated games. Decision Support Systems 39(1), 55–66 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papadimitriou, C.H., Yannakakis, M.: On complexity as bounded rationality. In: 26th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 726–733 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nachbar, J.H., Zame, W.R.: Non-computable strategies and discounted repeated games. Economic Theory 8(1), 103–122 (1996)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, X., Deng, X.: 3-Nash is PPAD-complete. In: Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Daskalakis, C., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Three-Player Games Are Hard. In: Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, X., Deng, X.: Settling the Complexity of Two-Player Nash Equilibrium. In: Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, X., Deng, X., Teng, S.H.: Settling the complexity of computing two-player Nash equilibria. Journal of the ACM 56(3) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldberg, P.W., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Reducibility Among Equilibrium Problems. In: 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 61–70 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lemke, C.E., Howson, J.T.: Equilibrium Points of Bimatrix Games. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 12(2), 413–423 (1964)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Stengel, B.V.: 45. In: Computing Equilibria for Two-Person Games, vol. 3, pp. 1723–1759. Springer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Savani, R., von Stengel, B.: Exponentially Many Steps for Finding a Nash Equilibrium in a Bimatrix Game. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 258–267 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Daskalakis, C., Fabrikant, A., Papadimitriou, C.H.: The Game World Is Flat: The Complexity of Nash Equilibria in Succinct Games. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4051, pp. 513–524. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Algorithmic Game Theory: A Snapshot. In: Albers, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Matias, Y., Nikoletseas, S., Thomas, W. (eds.) ICALP 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5555, pp. 3–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Daskalakis, C.: On the Complexity of Approximating a Nash Equilibrium. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 9(3) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lipton, R.J., Markakis, E., Mehta, A.: Playing large games using simple strategies. In: 4th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 36–41 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Daskalakis, C., Papadimitriou, C.H.: On oblivious PTAS’s for Nash equilibrium. In: 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 75–84. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Koller, D., Pfeffer, A.: Representations and solutions for game-theoretic problems. Artificial Intelligence 94(1–2), 167–215 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Shoham, Y., Leyton-Brown, K.: Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roughgarden, T.: Computing equilibria: a computational complexity perspective. Economic Theory 42(1), 193–236 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge Uni. Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Daskalakis, C.: The Complexity of Nash Equilibria. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lu, Y., He, Y. (2014). Towards the Computation of a Nash Equilibrium. In: Zeng, Z., Li, Y., King, I. (eds) Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2014. ISNN 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8866. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12436-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12436-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12435-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12436-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics