Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

  • 720 Accesses

Abstract

The present chapter will be devoted to the notion of strategy training, often referred to as strategy-based instruction (SBI; Rubin et al. 2007). The author will address contentious issues such as, among others, the intensity of the training, language choice or the selection of strategies to be taught. Emphasis will be placed on the studies into the effectiveness of strategic intervention. Finally, the chapter will present different types of studies into LLS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afflerbach, P. (2000). Verbal reports and protocol analysis. In M. L. Kamil, B. Mosenthal, D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 163–179). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. J. (2002http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v1n12004/chamot.htm#Anderson,%202002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest, April 2002, 3–4. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/0110anderson.html

  • Bialystok, E. (1983). Inferencing: Testing the “hypothesis-testing” hypothesis. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 104–123). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2003). A longitudinal think-aloud study of spontaneous strategic processing during the reading of multiple expository texts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1980). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. N. Flavell & E. M. Markham (Eds.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, S. (2005). Action research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 241–256). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, K. A. (2003). Improving high school English language learners’ second language listening through strategy instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 52, 401–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U. (1999). Reading and writing processes: Learning strategies in immersion classrooms. In M. A. Kassen (Ed.), Language learners of tomorrow: Process and promise (pp. 29–59). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U. (2007). Accelerating academic achievement of English language learners: A synthesis of five evaluations of the CALLA Model. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), The international handbook of English language learning, Part I (pp. 317–331). Norwell, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U., & Keatley, C. (2003). Learning strategies of adolescent low-literacy Hispanic ESL students. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1986). A cognitive academic language learning approach: An ESL content-based curriculum. Wheaton, MD: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. White Plains: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterfield, R., & Chesterfield, K. B. (1985). Natural order in children’s use of second language learning strategies. Applied Linguistics, 6, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D., & Aphek, E. (1980). Retention of second language vocabulary over time: investigating the role of mnemonic associations. System, 8, 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R., & Chi, C. (2003). Language strategy use survey. In A. Cohen & S. J. Weaver (Eds.), Styles and strategies-based instruction: A teacher’s guide (pp. 68–74). Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D., Paige, R. M., Shively, R. L., Emert, H., & Hoff, J. (2005). Maximizing study abroad through language and culture strategies: Research on students, study abroad program professionals, and language instructors. Final Report to the International Research and Studies Program, Office of International Education, DOE, Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, D. F. (1978). The development of learning strategies curriculum. In H. O’Neill (Ed.), Learning strategies (pp. 1–29). San Francisco, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, D. F. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (pp. 209–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S. J., & Murphy, D. A. (1986). Designing systems that train learning ability: From theory to practice. Review of Educational Research, 56, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droździał-Szelest, K. (1997). Language learning strategies in the process of acquiring a foreign language. Poznań: Motivex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droździał-Szelest, K. (2004). Strategie uczenia się języka obcego: badania a rzeczywistość edukacyjna. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Autonomia w nauce języka obcego (pp. 31–43). Poznań-Kalisz: Wydawnictwo Wydziału Pedagogiczno-Artystycznego w Kaliszu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, P. (2007). Case study research in applied linguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., & Sinclair, B. (1989). Learning to learn English: A course in learner training. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Verbal reports on thinking. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 24–53). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erler, L., & Finkbeiner, C. (2007). A review of reading strategies: Focus on the impact of first language. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies (pp. 187–206). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. (2004). A critical review of questionnaire use in learner strategy research. Prospect, 1, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2000). Writing development: The role of cognitive, motivational, and social/contextual factors. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58, 747–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, M., & Harris, V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, M., & Harris, V. (2004). Language-learning strategies: A case for cross-curricular collaboration. Language Awareness, 13, 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C. (2004). Language learning strategies: Theory and research (Occasional Paper No. 1). School of Foundations Studies, Auckland Institute of Studies at St. Helens, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.crie.org.nz/research-papers/c_griffiths_op1.pdf

  • Halbach, A. (2000). Finding out about students’ learning strategies by looking at their diaries: A case study. System, 28, 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Z. (2002). Heritage Spanish speakers’ language learning strategies. Eric Digest. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/0206hancock.html

  • Harris, V., Gaspar, A., Jones, B., Ingvadottir, H., Palos, I., Neuburg, R., et al. (2001). Helping learners learn: Exploring strategy instruction in language classrooms across Europe. Graz, Austria: European Centre for Modern Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, X., Macaro, E., Mason, D., Nye, G., Smith, P., & Vanderplank, E. (2005). Strategy training in language learning—A systematic review of available research. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. Retrieved from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=gyGaSk7Q-6o%3D&tabid=296&mid=1147

  • He, A. (2002). Learning English in different linguistic and socio-cultural contexts. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7, 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. F., Palincsar, A. S., Ogle, D. S., & Carr, E. G. (1987). Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the content areas. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, E. (1991). Compensatory strategies in second language research: A critique, a revision and some (non-) implications for the classroom. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign and second language pedagogy research (pp. 142–161). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, R. (1989). Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitajima, R. (1997). Referential strategy training for second language reading comprehension of Japanese texts. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge: CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, B. D. (2002). The effects of metacognitive language learning strategy training on lower-achieving second language learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Brigham Young University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, M. (2001). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on reading comprehension and metacognitive knowledge. In S. Foster-Cohen, & A. Niżegorodcew (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 86 (pp. 255–274). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoCastro, V. (1994). Learning strategies and learning environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoCastro, V. (1995). The author responds. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 172–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second Language classrooms. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Vanderplank, R. (2007). A review of listening strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies (pp. 165–185). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, S. H. (1995). Strategy and skill in learning a foreign language. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, S. H. (1999). Learner strategies: State of the art article. Language Teaching, 32, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meskill, C. (1991). Language learning strategies advice: A study on the effects of on-line messaging. System, 19, 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michońska-Stadnik, A. (2008). Identyfikacja oraz trening strategii dla rozwoju autonomii. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Autonomia w nauce języka obcego—Co osiągnęliśmy i dokąd zmierzamy (pp. 393–403). Poznań-Kalisz-Konin: Wydawnictwo UAM i PWSZ w Koninie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9, 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25, 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. A report. Research in Education Series 7. The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. New York: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. (1995). Closing the gap between learning and instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, J., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, J., Chamot, A., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kűpper, L., & Russo, R. (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. (2008). Hero with a thousand faces: Learner autonomy, learning strategies and learning tactics in independent language learning. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 41–63). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R., Cho, Y., Leung, S., & Kim, H.-J. (2004). Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozeki, N. (2000). Listening strategy instruction for female EFL college students in Japan (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University of Pennsylvania, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, R. M., Cohen, A. D., & Shively, R. L. (2004). Assessing the impact of a strategies/based curriculum on language and culture learning abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10, 253–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G. (1988). Models and metaphors of learning strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction and evaluation (pp. 299–321). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2008a). Advanced learners’ use of strategies for learning grammar: A diary study. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Investigating English language learning and teaching (pp. 109–125). Kalisz-Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2009d). Metodologia badań nad strategiami uczenia się. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Metody badań w językoznawstwie stosowanym (Vol. 32, pp. 65–83). Neofilolog: Czasopismo Polskiego Towarzystwa Neofilologicznego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, M. (1989). Learning strategies for second language users. Lewinson, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, L., & Harsch, K. (1999). Enhancing the learning experience with strategy journals: Supporting the diverse learning styles of ESL/EFL students. In Proceedings of the HERDSA Annual International Conference, 13 July 1999 (pp. 1–18). Retrieved from http://herdsa.org.au/vic/cornerstones/pdf/Riley.PDF

  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1981). The study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15–30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1990). Improving foreign language listening comprehension. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on language and linguistics (pp. 309–316). Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (2003). Diary writing as a process: Simple, useful, powerful. Guidelines, 25, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J., Chamot, A. U., Harris, V., & Anderson, N. J. (2007). Intervening in the use of strategies. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms (pp. 117–139). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, K. (2000). Intervening in tertiary students’ strategic listening in Japanese as a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Griffith University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 433–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2003). Students’ strategic use of multiple sources during expository reading: A longitudinal think-aloud study. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 113–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, O. (2003). What can we learn from good language learners? A qualitative study in the Japanese foreign language context. System, 31, 313–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H. N., & Moore, D. (1992). Effects of cognitive and metacognitive pre-reading activities on the reading comprehension of ESL learners. Educational Psychology, 12, 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29, 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulitsky, H. (2000). Language learner strategies with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22, 285–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ): Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, F. (2003). Addressing constraints on autonomy in school contexts: Lessons from working with teachers. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 220–239). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenden, A. (1987). Incorporating learner training in the classroom. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 159–168). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C. J. (1995). Autonomy and strategy use in distance foreign language learning: Research findings. System, 23, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, C. J. (1997). Effects of mode of study on foreign language learning. Distance Education, 18, 178–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, C. J., Schramm, K., & Chamot, A. U. (2007). Research methods in strategy research: Re-examining the toolbox. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies (pp. 93–116). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trendak, O. (2015). Strategy Training and Research Methodology. In: Exploring the Role of Strategic Intervention in Form-focused Instruction. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12433-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics