Skip to main content

3D vs. 4D Ontologies in Enterprise Modeling

  • Conference paper
Advances in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8823))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between a 3D and a 4D ontology, with the purpose of identifying modeling variations that arise from using these different kinds of ontologies. The modeling variations are illustrated by using two enterprise modeling enigmas to which both ontologies are applied. The goal of our comparison is to demonstrate that the choice of an ontology impacts on the representation of real world phenomena and will eventually result in different enterprise models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Vernadat, F.B.: Enterprise modeling and integration (EMI): Current status and research perspectives. Annual Reviews in ControlĀ 26, 15ā€“25 (2002)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Vernadat, F.: UEML: Towards a Unified Enterprise Modelling Language. International Journal of Production ResearchĀ 40, 4309ā€“4321 (2002)

    ArticleĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. GrĆ¼ninger, M., Atefi, K., Fox, M.: Ontologies to support process integration in enterprise engineering. Computational & Mathematical Organization, 381ā€“394 (2000)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Opdahl, A.L., Berio, G., Harzallah, M., Matulevičius, R.: An ontology for enterprise and information systems modeling. Applied OntologyĀ 7, 49ā€“92 (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Gruber, T.R.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge AcquisitionsĀ 5, 199ā€“220 (1993)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Wand, Y.: Ontology as a foundation for meta-modeling and method engineering. Information and Software TechnologyĀ 38, 281ā€“287 (1996)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What Is an Ontology? In: Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 1ā€“17 (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Hales, S.D.S., Johnson, T.T.A.: Endurantism, perdurantism and special relativity. The Philosophical QuarterlyĀ 53, 524ā€“539 (2003)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A., van der Weide, T.P.: A fundamental view on the process of conceptual modeling. In: Delcambre, L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, Ɠ. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol.Ā 3716, pp. 128ā€“143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: Can BPMN Be Used for Making Simulation Models? In: Barjis, J., Eldabi, T., Gupta, A. (eds.) EOMAS 2011. LNBIP, vol.Ā 88, pp. 100ā€“115. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Partridge, C.: Business Objects: Re-engineering for Reuse. Butterworth-Heinemann (2005)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: WonderWeb Deliverable D17. The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies and the DOLCE ontology (2002)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: Using the Unified Foundational Ontology ( UFO ) as a Foundation for General Conceptual Modeling Languages. Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications, 175ā€“196 (2010)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Al Debei, M.M.: Conceptual Modeling and the Quality of Ontologies: Endurantism Vs Perdurantism. International Journal of Database Management SystemsĀ 4, 1ā€“19 (2012)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., de Almeida Falbo, R., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Almeida, J.P.A.: Towards Ontological Foundations for the Conceptual Modeling of Events Background: The Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO). In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol.Ā 8217, pp. 327ā€“341. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Masolo, C., Guizzardi, G., Vieu, L.: Relational roles and qua-individuals. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Roles, pp. 103ā€“112 (2005)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Hadar, I.: When intuition and logic clash: The case of the object-oriented paradigm. Science of Computer ProgrammingĀ 78, 1407ā€“1426 (2013)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Verdonck, M., Gailly, F., Poels, G. (2014). 3D vs. 4D Ontologies in Enterprise Modeling. In: Indulska, M., Purao, S. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8823. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12256-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12256-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12256-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics