Skip to main content

The Effects of Variation on Solving a Combinatorial Optimization Problem in Collaborative Multi-Agent Systems

  • Conference paper
Multiagent System Technologies (MATES 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8732))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In collaborative multi-agent systems, the participating agents have to join forces in order to solve a common goal. The necessary coordination is often realized by message exchange. While this might work perfectly in simulated environments, the implementation of such systems in a field application usually reveals some challenging properties: arbitrary communication networks, message delays due to specific communication technologies, or differing processing speeds of the agents. In this contribution we interpret these properties as sources of variation, and analyze four different multi-agent heuristics with respect to these aspects. In this regard, we distinguish synchronous from asynchronous approaches, and draw conclusions for either type. Our work is motivated by the use case of scheduling distributed energy resources within self-organized virtual power plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferber, J.: Multi-Agent Systems: Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley – An Imprint of Pearson Education (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shehory, O., Kraus, S.: Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. Artificial Intelligence 101(1-2), 165–200 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Shehory, O., Kraus, S.: Feasible formation of coalitions among autonomous agents in nonsuperadditive environments. Computational Intelligence 15(3), 218–251 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Griffiths, N., Luck, M.: Coalition formation through motivation and trust. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 17–24. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tröschel, M., Appelrath, H.-J.: Towards reactive scheduling for large-scale virtual power plants. In: Braubach, L., van der Hoek, W., Petta, P., Pokahr, A. (eds.) MATES 2009. LNCS, vol. 5774, pp. 141–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Nieße, A., Lehnhoff, S., Tröschel, M., Uslar, M., Wissing, C., Appelrath, H.J., Sonnenschein, M.: Market-Based Self-Organized Provision of Active power and Ancillary services: An Agent-Based Approach for Smart Distribution Grids. In: Complexity in Engineering (COMPENG)  (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beer, S., Sonnenschein, M., Appelrath, H.J.: Towards a Self-Organization Mechanism for Agent Associations in Electricity Spot Markets. In: Heiß, H.U., Pepper, P., Schlingloff, H., Schneider, J. (eds.) Informatik 2011 – Proceedings der 41. GI-Jahrestagung. GI-Edition – Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), pp. P-191. Bonner Köllen Verlag (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ashby, W.: Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1(2), 83–99 (1958)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, A., Riggs, C., Wu, A.S.: On the impact of variation on self-organizing systems. In: Fifth IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO 2011), pp. 119–128. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anders, G., Hinrichs, C., Siefert, F., Behrmann, P., Reif, W., Sonnenschein, M.: On the Influence of Inter-Agent Variation on Multi-Agent Algorithms Solving a Dynamic Task Allocation Problem under Uncertainty. In: Sixth IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO 2012), pp. 29–38. IEEE Computer Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. UCTE: UCTE Operation Handbook – Policy 1: Load-Frequency Control and Performance. Technical Report UCTE OH P1, Union for the Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abarrategui, O., Marti, J., Gonzalez, A.: Constructing the active european power grid. The Online Journal on Power and Energy Engineering (OJPEE) 1(4) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hinrichs, C., Lehnhoff, S., Sonnenschein, M.: A Decentralized Heuristic for Multiple-Choice Combinatorial Optimization Problems. In: Operations Research Proceedings 2012, pp. 297–302. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lisovich, M.A., Mulligan, D.K., Wicker, S.B.: Inferring Personal Information from Demand-Response Systems. IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine 8(1), 11–20 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. AlAbdulkarim, L., Lukszo, Z.: Integrating information security requirements in critical infrastructures: smart metering case. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures 6(2), 187–209 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chapman, A.C., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.R., Leslie, D.S.: A unifying framework for iterative approximate best-response algorithms for distributed constraint optimization problems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 26(4), 411–444 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kok, J.K., Warmer, C.J., Kamphuis, I.G.: Powermatcher: Multiagent control in the electricity infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2005). ACM Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wedde, H.F., Lehnhoff, S., Rehtanz, C., Krause, O.: Bottom-Up Self-Organization of Unpredictable Demand and Supply under Decentralized Power Management. In: 2008 Second IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, pp. 74–83. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Anders, G., Siefert, F., Steghöfer, J.P., Seebach, H., Nafz, F., Reif, W.: Structuring and Controlling Distributed Power Sources by Autonomous Virtual Power Plants. In: IEEE Power and Energy Student Summit (PESS 2010). IEEE Power & Energy Society (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pournaras, E., Warnier, M., Brazier, F.M.: Local agent-based self-stabilisation in global resource utilisation. International Journal of Autonomic Computing 1(4) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li, J., Poulton, G., James, G.: Coordination of Distributed Energy Resource Agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 24(5), 351–380 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Horowitz, S.H., Phadke, A.G.: Power System Relaying, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Geelen, D., van Kempen, G., van Hoogstraten, F., Liotta, A.: A wireless mesh communication protocol for smart-metering. In: 2012 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), pp. 343–349. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. Journal of the ACM 32(2), 374–382 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Nieße, A., Sonnenschein, M.: Using Grid Related Cluster Schedule Resemblance for Energy Rescheduling. In: Donnellan, B., Martins, J.A., Helfert, M., Krempels, K.H. (eds.) SMARTGREENS 2013 – 2nd International Conference on Smart Grids and Green IT Systems, pp. 22–31. INSTICC Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hinrichs, C., Lehnhoff, S., Sonnenschein, M.: Paving the Royal Road for Complex Systems: On the Influence of Memory on Adaptivity. In: Pelster, A., Wunner, G. (eds.) International Symposium Selforganization in Complex Systems: The Past, Present, and Future of Synergetics, Springer (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Han, B., Leblet, J., Simon, G.: Hard Multidimensional Multiple Choice Knapsack Problems, an Empirical Study. Computers & Operations Research 37(1), 172–181 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Hinrichs, C., Sonnenschein, M., Lehnhoff, S.: Evaluation of a Self-Organizing Heuristic for Interdependent Distributed Search Spaces. In: Filipe, J., Fred, A. (eds.) International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2013), vol. 1, pp. 25–34. INSTICC Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Doval, D., O’Mahony, D.: Overlay Networks: A Scalable Alternative for P2P. IEEE Internet Computing 7(4), 79–82 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Strogatz, S.: Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(6825), 268–276 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hinrichs, C., Sonnenschein, M. (2014). The Effects of Variation on Solving a Combinatorial Optimization Problem in Collaborative Multi-Agent Systems. In: Müller, J.P., Weyrich, M., Bazzan, A.L.C. (eds) Multiagent System Technologies. MATES 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8732. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11584-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11584-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11583-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11584-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics