Skip to main content

Does CLIL Enhance Oral Skills? Fluency and Pronunciation Errors by Spanish-Catalan Learners of English

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Content-based Language Learning in Multilingual Educational Environments

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 23))

Abstract

This chapter investigates the mid-term effects of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) on intermediate Spanish-Catalan learners’ oral fluency and accuracy in English as a foreign language (EFL). Two groups of EFL learners (CLIL, N = 21, and FI, N = 22) were recorded performing two oral narrative tasks at two points in time separated by a 2-year interval. The fluency measurements used in the present study combined several temporal aspects of speech production including syllables per minute, pruned syllables per minute—excluding disfluencies, repetitions and false starts—, pauses per minute and mean pause duration. Both groups were found to make progress after 2 years of instruction, regardless of teaching methodology. However, CLIL learners were found to progress faster than their formal instruction (FI) peers, who made only modest progress after 2 years of FI. Speech errors were analyzed by a native English speaker who phonetically transcribed vowel identity. Results showed that CLIL instruction did not have an ameliorating effect on students’ pronunciation of vowel segments. Additional analyses revealed that spelling and vowel identity influenced the amount of vowel pronunciation errors produced by both groups of learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    VOT (voice onset time) is defined as “the duration of the time interval by which the onset of periodic pulsing either precedes or follows release” (Lisker and Abramson 1964: 387). VOT has been used in many cross-linguistic studies that investigate the acquisition of L2 stops (see Amengual (2012) or Rallo Fabra (1998) for a review).

  2. 2.

    Participants were also recorded at the end of the academic year in which the CLIL program started (time 2). The language samples obtained at time 2 were analyzed for intelligibility and foreign accent in a previous study (Rallo Fabra and Juan-Garau 2011).

References

  • Amengual, M. (2012). Interlingual influence in bilingual speech: Cognate status effects in a continuum of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrani, T., & Shu Sim, T. (2012). Informal language setting: Technology or social interaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basetti, B. (2009). Orthographic input and second language phonology. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 191–206). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2013). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.41. http://www.praat.org/. Accessed 12 Feb 2013.

  • Burnham, D. K., Tyler, M., & Horlyck, S. (2002). Periods of speech perception development and their vestiges in adulthood. In A. Rohde (Ed.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 281–300). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2000). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 989–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2862–2873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, N., & Wempe, T. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 385–390. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.2.385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demenko, G., Wagner, A., Cylwick, N., & Jokisch, O. (2009). An audiovisual feedback system for acquiring L2 pronunciation and L2 prosody (pp. 2–5). 2nd ISCA workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdener, V. D., & Burnham, D. K. (2005). The role of audiovisual speech and orthograpic information in nonnative speech production. Language Learning, 55, 191–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S.-Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85–101). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, E. (2004). Phonics: A large phoneme-grapheme frequency count revised. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullana, N. (2006). The development of English (FL) perception and production skills: Starting age and exposure effects. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 41–64). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo del Puerto, F., Gómez Lacabex, E., & García Lecumberri, M. L. (2009). Testing the effectiveness of content and language integrated learning in foreign language contexts: The assessment of English pronunciation. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. Jiménez Catalan (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 63–80). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesee, F. (1987). Learning through two languages: Studies of immersion and bilingual education. New York: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerly, H. (1991). Fluency and accuracy. Toward balance in language teaching and learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada, T. (2007). The production of voice onset time (VOT) by English-speaking children in a Japanese immersion program. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 353–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O’Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29, 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J. (2015). Learning English and learning through English: Insights from secondary education. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 105–121). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mich, O., Neri, A., & Giuliani, D. (2006). The effectiveness of a computer assisted pronunciation training system for young language learners. In Proceedings of CALL 2006 (pp. 135–143), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 20–22 August 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modiano, M. (1996). European English. World Englishes, 15, 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora, J. C., & Valls-Ferrer, M. (2012). Oral fluency, accuracy and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 610–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2006). ASR-based corrective feedback on pronunciation: Does it really work? In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing INTERSPEECH 2006 (pp. 1982–1985), Pittsburgh 17–21 September 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafat, Y. (2010). Orthography as a conditioning factor in L2 transfer: Evidence from English speakers’ production of Spanish consonants. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, New Sounds 2010. Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, 1–3 May 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallo Fabra, L. (1998). Speaking rate effects in Catalan and English. A cross-language study. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, IX, 243–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallo Fabra, L., & Juan-Garau, M. (2011). Assessing EFL pronunciation in a semi-immersion setting: The effects of CLIL instruction on Spanish-Catalan learners perceived comprehensibility and accentedness. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47, 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rallo Fabra, L., & Romero, J. (2012). Native Catalan learners’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 491–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segalowitz, N. (2007). Access fluidity, attention control, and the acquisition of fluency in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, W. (1995). Cross-language studies of speech perception. A historical review. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 3–46). Baltimore: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivola, M., Lennes, M., Korvala, J., & Aho, E. (2010, May 1–3). A longitudinal study of speech rate and pauses in non-native Finnish. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel, & M. Kul (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on the acquisition of second language speech, new sounds 2010 (pp. 499–504). Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by research grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (HUM2007-66053-C02-01/02, FFI2010-21483-C02-02 and FFI2013-48640-C2-1/2-P) and the Catalan Government (SGR2005-01086/2009-140/2014-1563).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucrecia Rallo Fabra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rallo Fabra, L., Jacob, K. (2015). Does CLIL Enhance Oral Skills? Fluency and Pronunciation Errors by Spanish-Catalan Learners of English. In: Juan-Garau, M., Salazar-Noguera, J. (eds) Content-based Language Learning in Multilingual Educational Environments. Educational Linguistics, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11496-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics