Abstract
The question as to whether spatial information is coded using an egocentric or an allocentric frame of reference has led to three prominent but competing models of spatial cognition being proposed. In this paper, these models are reviewed on theoretical rather than empirical grounds and are shown to be similar. While using these two different frames of reference produce equivalent maps, the action guiding property of egocentric maps means that these maps are best computed at the perceptual-motor level and the ease of updating an allocentric map means that these maps are best computed for representing the larger environment. However, the latter is simply too empowering and is not suitable as a “map in the head”. Based on a recent computational theory of perceptual mapping, we suggest an alternative – an allocentric trace of local environments visited rather than an allocentric map of the physical environment itself. Such a trace is egocentric and transient and has both a spatial and a temporal aspect. It provides a rich input that will allow different species to learn a different enduring representation of its environment, each tailored to their own needs for survival.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benhamou, S.: No evidence for cognitive mapping in rats. Animal Behavior 52, 201–212 (1996)
Bennett, A.T.D.: Do animals have cognitive maps? The Journal of Experimental Biology 199, 219–224 (1996)
Briscoe, R.: Egocentric spatial representation in action and perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79(2), 423–460 (2009)
Burgess, N.: Spatial memory: How egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, 551–557 (2006)
Campbell, J.: Past, space and time. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
Diwadkar, V.A., McNamara, T.P.: Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science 8, 302–307 (1997)
Durrant-Whyte, H., Bailey, T.: Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM): Part I. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 13(2), 99–110 (2006)
Evans, G.: The varieties of reference. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1982)
Glennerster, A., Hansard, M.E., Fitzgibbon, A.W.: View-based approaches to spatial representation in human vision. In: Cremers, D., Rosenhahn, B., Yuille, A.L., Schmidt, F.R. (eds.) Statistical and Geometrical Approaches to Visual Motion Analysis. LNCS, vol. 5604, pp. 193–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Galati, G., Pelle, G., Berthoz, A., Committeri, G.: Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory. Experimental Brain Research 206(2), 109–120 (2010)
Gallistel, C.R.: The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)
Grush, R.: Self, world and space: The meaning and mechanisms of ego- and allocentric spatial representation. Brain and Mind 1(1), 59–92 (2000)
Hurlbert, A.C.: Knowing is seeing. Current Biology 4, 423–426 (1994)
Hossain, M.Z., Yeap, W.K.: How Albot1 computes its topological-metric map. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 97, 553–560 (2013)
Ishikawa, T., Montello, D.R.: Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology 52, 93–129 (2006)
Jefferies, M.E., Yeap, W.K. (eds.): Robotics and cognitive approaches to spatial mapping. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Mackintosh, N.J.: Do not ask whether they have a cognitive map, but how they find their way about. Psicologica 23, 165–185 (2002)
McNamara, T.P.: How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In: Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition III. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2685, pp. 174–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
McNamara, T.P., Rump, B., Werner, S.: Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10(3), 589–595 (2003)
McNaughton, B.L., Chen, L.L., Markus, E.J.: “Dead reckoning,” landmark learning, and the sense of direction: A neurophysiological and computational hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3, 190–202 (1991)
Mou, W., McNamara, T.P.: Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 28, 162–170 (2002)
Mou, W., McNamara, T.P., Rump, B., Xiao, C.: Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 12(6), 1274–1290 (2006)
Mou, W., McNamara, T.P., Valiquette, C.M., Rump, B.: Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 30(1), 142–157 (2004)
Normand, E., Boesch, C.: Sophisticated Euclidean maps in forest chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 77, 1195–1201 (2009)
Noser, R., Byrne, R.W.: Travel routes and planning of visits to out-of-sight resources in wild chacma baboons, Papio ursinus. Animal Behaviour 73, 257–266 (2007)
Paillard, J.: Motor and representational framing of space. In: Paillard, J. (ed.) Brain and Space, pp. 163–182. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991)
Pecchia, T., Vallortigara, G.: View-based strategy for reorientation by geometry. The Journal of Experimental Biology 213, 2987–2996 (2010)
Rump, B., McNamara, T.P.: Updating in models of spatial memory. In: Barkowsky, T., Knauff, M., Ligozat, G., Montello, D.R. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4387, pp. 249–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Shelton, A.L., McNamara, T.P.: Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology 43, 274–310 (2001)
Sholl, M.J.: The role of a self-reference system in spatial navigation. In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 217–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Snowden, R.J.: Visual perception: Here’s mud in your mind’s eye. Current Biology 9, R336-R337 (1999)
Thrun, S., Fox, D., Burgard, W., Dellaert, F.: Robust Monte Carlo Localization for Mobile Robots. Artificial Intelligence 128(1-2), 99–141 (2001)
Tolman, E.C.: Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55, 189–208 (1948)
Waller, D., Hodgson, E.: Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 32, 867–882 (2006)
Wang, R.F., Spelke, E.S.: Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition 77, 215–250 (2000)
Wang, R.F., Spelke, E.S.: Human spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(9), 376–382 (2002)
Yeap, W.K.: A computational theory of perceptual mapping. In: Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Conference, Boston, USA, pp. 429–434 (2011)
Yeap, W.K., Hossain, M.Z., Brunner, T.: On the implementation of a theory of perceptual mapping. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Perth, Australia, pp. 739–748 (2011)
Zhang, H., Mou, W., McNamara, T.P.: Spatial updating according to a fixed reference direction of a briefly viewed layout. Cognition 119, 419–429 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yeap, W.K. (2014). On Egocentric and Allocentric Maps. In: Freksa, C., Nebel, B., Hegarty, M., Barkowsky, T. (eds) Spatial Cognition IX. Spatial Cognition 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11214-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11215-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)