Skip to main content

Autonomy and Dependence in Space Sciences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Autonomy in Space

Part of the book series: Studies in Space Policy ((STUDSPACE,volume 10))

Abstract

If there is a domain of space activities to which the expression “autonomy and dependence” does not apply, it is space sciences. As in all other branches of science, space sciences, which embrace astronomy, Solar System exploration, plasma and fundamental physics, as well as Earth sciences, benefit naturally from the strongest interaction of all the scientists involved. Scientific knowledge is based on the broadest confrontation of ideas, exchange of information and publication of results and discoveries. It has always been, is and will continue to be an international endeavour. Even though the brains of scientists are independent in general, space scientists are not autonomous—they are interdependent through an extensive intellectual confrontation that characterizes scientific progress and acquisition of knowledge. Independence in space sciences therefore appears to be more a political slogan than a scientific one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kidge, J. and Russo, A., 2000, A history of the European Space Agency, 1958-1987, ESA SP-1235, Vol-1, pp 1-45

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnet, R.M. and Manno, V., 1994, International Cooperation in Space, Harvard Univ. Press, Pub., pp 1-163

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kidge, J. and Russo, A., 2000, A history of the European Space Agency, 1958-1987, ESA SP-1235, Vol-2, pp 1-79

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cosmic Vision: Space Science for Europe 2015-2025, 2005, ESA Br. 247, pp 110

    Google Scholar 

  5. Billings, L., 2010, Nature 467, pp. 1028-1030

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bonnet, R.M and Bleeker, J., 2011, A Dark Age for Space Astronomy, Science, Vol. 333 no. 6039, pp. 161-162

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Astronet Infrastructure Roadmap: A Strategic Plan for European Astronomy, 2008, Astronet, pp 170

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, 2010, NRC US Academy of Sciences, pp 270

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vision and Voyages for Planetary Sciences in the Decade 2013-2022, 2011, NRC US Academy of Sciences, pp 400

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ubertini, Pietro, et al. “Future of Space Astronomy: A Road Map for the Next Decades.” 2012, COSPAR Working Group, pp 8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger-Maurice Bonnet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bonnet, RM. (2015). Autonomy and Dependence in Space Sciences. In: Al-Ekabi, C. (eds) European Autonomy in Space. Studies in Space Policy, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11110-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11110-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11109-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11110-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics