Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 140))

Abstract

A key feature of geodetic adjustment theory is the description of stochastic properties of the estimated quantities. A variety of tools and measures have been developed to describe the quality of ordinary least-squares estimates, for example, variance-covariance information, redundancy numbers, etc. Many of these features can easily be extended to a constrained least-squares estimate with equality constraints. However, this is not true for inequality constrained estimates. In many applications in geodesy the introduction of inequality constraints could improve the results (e.g. filter and network design or the regularization of ill-posed problems). This calls for an adequate stochastic modeling accompanying the already highly developed estimation theory in the field of inequality constrained estimation. Therefore, in this contribution, an attempt is made to develop measures for the quality of inequality constrained least-squares estimates combining Monte Carlo methods and the theory of quadratic programming. Special emphasis is placed on the derivation of confidence regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen MH, Shao QM (1999) Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. J Comput Graph Stat 8(1):69–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig G (1998) Linear programming and extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch D (1985) Some additional informations on the capacity of the linear complementarity algorithm. In: Grafarend E, Sansò F (eds) Optimization and design of geodetic networks. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo, pp 169–184

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke J (1986) Exact Inference in the inequality constrained normal linear regression model. J Appl Econ 1(2):127–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill P, Murray W, Wright M (1981) Practical optimization. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2008) Evaluation of measurement data—Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”—Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch A (2006) Semantische Integration von zweidimensionalen GIS-Daten und Digitalen Geländemodellen. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR (1981) Hypothesis testing with inequalities. Bollettino di geodesia e scienze affini 2:136–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR (2007) Introduction to bayesian statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew CK (1976) Inequality constrained least-squares estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 71(355):746–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Zhang H, Shong S, Guo C (2006) An aggregate constraint method for inequality-constrained least squares problems. J Geodesy 79:705–713. Doi:10.1007/s00190-006-0026-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roese-Koerner L, Krasbutter I, Schuh WD (2012a) A constrained quadratic programming technique for data-adaptive design of decorrelation filters. In: Sneeuw N, Novak P, Crespi M, Sanso F, Sideris MG (eds) VII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, Rome, 2009, Springer, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 137, pp 165–170. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-22078-4_25

    Google Scholar 

  • Roese-Koerner L, Devaraju B, Sneeuw N, Schuh WD (2012b) A stochastic framework for inequality constrained estimation. J Geodesy 86(11):1005–1018. Doi:10.1007/s00190-012-0560-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Santerre R, Chang XW (2005) A Bayesian method for linear, inequality-constrained adjustment and its application to GPS positioning. J Geodesy 78:528–534. Doi:10.1007/s00190-004-0425-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Roese-Koerner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roese-Koerner, L., Devaraju, B., Schuh, WD., Sneeuw, N. (2015). Describing the Quality of Inequality Constrained Estimates. In: Kutterer, H., Seitz, F., Alkhatib, H., Schmidt, M. (eds) The 1st International Workshop on the Quality of Geodetic Observation and Monitoring Systems (QuGOMS'11). International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 140. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10828-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics