Skip to main content

Shake Table Testing of a Half-Scaled RC-URM Wall Structure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Experimental Research in Earthquake Engineering

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 35))

  • 1744 Accesses

Abstract

With the introduction of higher seismic design forces in the Swiss loading standard of 2003 most unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings fail to satisfy the seismic design check. For this reason, in new construction projects, a number of URM walls are nowadays replaced by reinforced concrete (RC) walls. The lateral bracing system of the resulting structure consists therefore of URM walls and some RC walls which are coupled by RC slabs and masonry spandrels. The same situation characterises a number of seismically retrofitted URM building across Europe in which RC walls are added to the original structure to improve its seismic behaviour. Within the framework of the FP7-SERIES project, a four-storey RC-URM wall structure was tested on the shake table at the EUCENTRE TREES Laboratory (Laboratory for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology) in Pavia (Italy). The test was conducted at half-scale and is part of a larger research initiative on mixed RC-URM wall systems initiated at EPFL (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland). The key objective of the testing campaign was to gain insight into the dynamic behaviour of mixed RC-URM wall structures and to provide input for the definition of a performance-based design approach of such mixed structural system. Multiple shaking at increasing intensity was used to test the dynamic behaviour of the examined building. During the final shaking several of the URM walls lost their axial load bearing capacity, however, the structure did not collapse as it was subjected to uni-directional loading only and the axial load was transferred to the RC walls and the URM walls that were loaded out-of-plane. Random noise vibration tests were performed to monitor the elongation of the natural periods induced by the damage progression. The paper presents details on the structural system and the selected ground motion, the test set-up and the instrumentation. Additionally, initial results of the shake table test are presented with a first interpretation of the observed structural behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • CEN (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Code EN 1998-1, European committee for standardization. Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European code EN 1998-3, European committee for standardization. Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Dazio A (2008) The effect of the boundary conditions on the out-of-plane behaviour of unreinforced masonry walls. 14th world conference on earthquake engineering (WCEE 2008), 12–17 October, 2008, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Krawinkler H (1979) Possibilities and limitations of scale-model testing in earthquake engineering. In: Proceedings of the second U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering. Stanford, pp 283–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Paparo A, Beyer K (2014) Quasi-static cyclic tests of two mixed reinforced concrete–unreinforced masonry wall structures, Engineering Structures 71:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry S, Beyer K (2014a) Scaling unreinforced masonry for reduced-scale testing, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12(6):2557–2581, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry S, Beyer K (2014b) Influence of boundary conditions and size effect on the drift capacity of URM walls, Engineering Structures 65(C):76–88

    Google Scholar 

  • SIA (2003) Actions on structures, SIA 261:2003. Swiss design code. Swiss society of engineers and architects, Zurich, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Tondelli M, Petry S, Peloso S and Beyer K (2014) Dynamic testing of a four-storey building with reinforced concrete and unreinforced masonry walls: Data set. Submitted to Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results received founding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007–2013] for access to TREES laboratory of EUCENTRE under grant agreement n° 227887 for the SERIES project. Additional financial support was received from the Office Fédéral de l’Environement (OFEV) in Switzerland. The authors appreciate and gratefully acknowledge both financial contributors. The bricks were purpose-manufactured by Morandi Frères SA, Switzerland. The authors would like to thank all members of the TREES laboratory and in particular the head of the laboratory, Prof. Alberto Pavese, for their invaluable support during the entire duration of the project as well as the staff of the structural engineering laboratory at EPFL who helped with the quasi-static cyclic tests and material tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrin Beyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tondelli, M., Petry, S., Lanese, I., Peloso, S., Beyer, K. (2015). Shake Table Testing of a Half-Scaled RC-URM Wall Structure. In: Taucer, F., Apostolska, R. (eds) Experimental Research in Earthquake Engineering. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10136-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics