Skip to main content

Empirical Analysis of the Shadow Economy of the South East European Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EU Crisis and the Role of the Periphery

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

  • 677 Accesses

Abstract

Shadow economy is related to the issue of non-reporting and/or underreporting of market transactions by economic agents. The prevalence of shadow economy can have serious impact on economic growth as well as on income distribution in a country. Findings in the literature about the size of shadow economy in SEE countries reveal relatively high levels of shadow economy. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to assess the size of shadow economy in the South East European countries by some new estimates covering the period from 2003 to 2011. The paper also investigates the response of the shadow economy to financial crisis. The Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) estimation procedure is used in order to estimate the size of the shadow economy. The econometric results obtained show that the average size of shadow economy of SEE countries is at about 33 % of the official GDP. The last 3 years show a slightly increasing trend in the magnitude of shadow economy in most of the countries compared to the previous period. This trend highlights the fact that the financial crisis has negative implications on the shadow economic activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Gerxhani (2004) for differences between developed and developing countries with respect to the shadow economy. See also, Schneider et al. (2010) about their recent evidence that the shadow economy’s trend is decreasing in both developing and industrialized countries by 3 percentage points. However, this finding needs further corroboration to be generalized. See in the next section for a discussion of various concepts of shadow economy in comparison with other prevalent concepts.

  2. 2.

    See Schneider et al. (2010).

  3. 3.

    See more Gerxhani (1999) ‘The Informal Sector in Developed and Less Developed Countries: Literature Survay’ Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, page 3.

  4. 4.

    For a comprehensive overview of each definition of these five categories see: Measuring the Non-Observed Economy – A Handbook, (2002). OECD.

  5. 5.

    Tedds (2005), “The Underground economy in Canada”, MPRA, page 3.

  6. 6.

    This sentence has been dedicated to countries such as: Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina, FYROM, Republic of Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia.

  7. 7.

    See Transition Reports 2008.

  8. 8.

    INSTAT is the state statistical office of Albania.

  9. 9.

    This part draws heavily upon (SEE monitor 2006) Iceg Ec Corvinus.

  10. 10.

    Comprehensive surveys of methods and empirical results are made by Schneider and Enste (2000) and Friedman and al. (2000).

  11. 11.

    For instance, according to Feige’s method, estimated size of the shadow economy of USA is 33 % of GDP for year 1979, and with Gutmann’s (1977) method is 13 % of GDP for the same year. See more for a critical analysis of the different macro methods: Ph. Barthelemy (1988) “The Macroeconomic Estimates of Hidden Economy: A Critical Analysis”.

  12. 12.

    The data for some years and some variables are not available for the Republic of Kosovo, Montenegro and Serbia, for this reason they are excluded from the sample.

  13. 13.

    The estimations for the base year 2005 for each country are considered those of Schneider et al. (2010).

  14. 14.

    The countries: Bulgaria, Romania and Slovenia are member states of the European Union. Bulgaria and Romania are among countries with the highest shadow economy in the EU.

  15. 15.

    See in the previous section.

References

  • Barthelemy P (1988) The macroeconomic estimates of the hidden economy: a critical analysis. Rev Income Wealth 34(2):183–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay S, Chaudhuri K, Schenider F (2003) The size and development of the Indian shadow economy and a comparison with other 18 Asian countries: an empirical investigation, mimeo. Working paper no 2003-02, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University, Linz

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Anno R (2006) The shadow economy in Portugal: an analysis with the MIMIC approach. J Appl Econ 10:253–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Anno R, Gomez-Antonio M, Alanon Pardo A (2007) Shadow economy in three different Mediterranean countries: France, Spain and Greece. A MIMIC approach. Empir Econ 33:51–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilat Y, Zinnes C (2000) The evolution of the shadow economy in transition countries: consequences for growth and donor assistance. CAEFR II discussion paper no. 83

    Google Scholar 

  • Feige E (1990) Defininig and estimating underground and informal economies. World Bank 18(7)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Weck H (1984) The hidden economy as an “unobserved” variable. Eur Econ Rev 26(1):33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman E, Johnson S, Kaufmann D, Zoido-Labton P (2000) Dodging the grabbing hand: the determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. J Public Econ 76(4):459–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerxhani K (1999) The informal sector in developed and less developed countries: literature survey. Tinbergen Institute discussion paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerxhani K (2004) The informal sector in developed and less developed countries: a literature survey. Public Choice 114(3–4):295–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles David EA (1998) The underground economy: minimizing the size of government. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Victoria, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles DEA, Tedds LM (2002) Taxes and the Canadian underground economy, vol 106, Canadian tax paper. Canadian Tax Foundation, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann P (1977) The subterranean economy. Financ Anal J 34(1):24–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S, Kaufman D, Shleifer A (1997) The unofficial economy in transition. Brookings papers on economic activity, no 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann D, Kaliberda A (1996) Integrating the unofficial economy into the dynamics of post-socialist economies: a framework of analysis and evidence. In: Kaminski B (ed) Economic transition in the newly independent states. M.E. Sharpe Press, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Shleifer A (2008) The unofficial economy and economic development. NBER working paper no 14520

    Google Scholar 

  • Loayza NV (1996) The economics of informal sector. A simple model and some empirical evidence for Latin American countries. IMF working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002) Measuring the Non-Observed Economy-A Handbook. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F (1986) Estimating the size of the Danish shadow economy using the currency demand approach: an attempt. Scand J Econ 88:643–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F (2002) The size and development of the shadow economies and shadow economy labor force of 22 transition and 21 OECD countries: what do we really know?

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F (2005) Shadow economies around the world: what do we really know? Eur J Polit Econ 21(3):598–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F, Enste D (2000) Shadow economies: size, causes, and consequences. J Econ Lit 38(1):77–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F, Buehn A, Montenegro Cl (2010) Shadow economies all over the world: new estimates for 162 countries from 1999 to 2007. Policy research working paper 5356

    Google Scholar 

  • SEE monitor (2006) Iceg Ec Corvinus

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi V (1980) The underground economy in the United States: estimates and implications. Banca Nacionale Del Lavoro 135(4):427–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi V (1983) The underground economy in the United States: annual estimates: 1930–1980. IMF Staff Pap 30(2):283–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi V (1999) Uses and abuses of estimates of the underground economy. Econ J 109(456):338–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tedds L (2005) The underground economy in Canada. MPRA

    Google Scholar 

  • Transition report (2008) Growth in transition. EBRD

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luljeta Sadiku .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sadiku, L., Berisha, N., Sadiku, M. (2015). Empirical Analysis of the Shadow Economy of the South East European Countries. In: Karasavvoglou, A., Ongan, S., Polychronidou, P. (eds) EU Crisis and the Role of the Periphery. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10133-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics