Skip to main content

How We’re Predicting AI – or Failing to

  • Chapter
Beyond Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics ((TIEI,volume 9))

Abstract

This paper will look at the various predictions that have been made about AI and propose decomposition schemas for analysing them. It will propose a variety of theoretical tools for analysing, judging and improving these predictions. Focusing specifically on timeline predictions (dates given by which we should expect the creation of AI), it will show that there are strong theoretical grounds to expect predictions to be quite poor in this area. Using a database of 95 AI timeline predictions, it will show that these expectations are born out in practice: expert predictions contradict each other considerably, and are indistinguishable from non-expert predictions and past failed predictions. Predictions that AI lie 15 to 25 years in the future are the most common, from experts and non-experts alike.

The authors wish to acknowledge the help and support of the Singularity Institute, the Future of Humanity Institute and the James Martin School, as well as the individual advice of Nick Bostrom, Luke Muelhauser, Vincent Mueller, Anders Sandberg, Lisa Makros, Sean O’Heigeartaigh, Daniel Dewey, Eric Drexler and the online community of Less Wrong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Turing, A.: Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 433–460 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacquette, D.: Metamathematical criteria for minds and machines. Erkenntnis 27(1) (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Darrach, B.: Meet Shakey, the first electronic person. Reflections of the Future (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hall, J.S.: Further reflections on the timescale of AI. In: Dowe, D.L. (ed.) Solomonoff Festschrift. LNCS, vol. 7070, pp. 174–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanson, R.: What if uploads come first: The crack of a future dawn. Extropy 6(2) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sandberg, A.: Whole brain emulations: A roadmap. Future of Humanity Institute Technical Report 2008-3 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deutsch, D.: The very laws of physics imply that artificial intelligence must be possible. What’s holding us up? Aeon (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Omohundro, S.: Basic ai drives. In: Proceedings of the First AGI Conference, vol. 171 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moore, G.: Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8) (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kurzweil, R.: The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. Viking Adult (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farra, Straus and Giroux (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carnap, R.: The Logical Structure of the World (1928)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Searle, J.: Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3), 417–457 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidhuber, J.: Artificial General Intelligence, pp. 177–200 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nagel, T.: What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review 83(4), 435–450 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lucas, J.: Minds, machines and Gödel. Philosophy XXXVI, 112–127 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schopenhauer, A.: The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (1831)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Edmonds, B.: The social embedding of intelligence. In: Parsing the Turing Test, pp. 211–235. Springer, Netherlands (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolpert, D., Macready, W.: No free lunch theorems for search (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Plato: The Republic (380 BC)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fallis, D.: Intentional gaps in mathematical proofs. Synthese 134(1-2) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Routley, R., Meyer, R.: Dialectical logic, classical logic, and the consistency of the world. Studies in East European Thought 16(1-2) (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morgan, M., Henrion, M.: Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hanson, R.: Economics of brain emulations. In: Unnatrual Selection - The Challenges of Engineering Tomorrow’s People, pp. 150–158 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shanteau, J.: Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 53, 252–266 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kahneman, D., Klein, G.: Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist 64(6), 515–526 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grove, W., Zald, D., Lebow, B., Snitz, B., Nelson, C.: Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment 12, 19–30 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tetlock, P.: Expert political judgement: How good is it? How can we know? (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., Ross, M.: Exploring the planning fallacy: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 366–381 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Riemann, B.: Über die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Grösse. Monatsberichte der Berliner Akademie (1859)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Waltz, D.: The prospects for building truly intelligent machines. Daedalus 117(1) (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Good, J.: The scientist speculates: An anthology of partly-baked ideas. Heinemann (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Armstrong, S.: Chaining god: A qualitative approach to AI, trust and moral systems (2007) (online article)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bostrom, N.: How long before superintelligence? International Journal of Futures Studies 2 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart Armstrong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armstrong, S., Sotala, K. (2015). How We’re Predicting AI – or Failing to. In: Romportl, J., Zackova, E., Kelemen, J. (eds) Beyond Artificial Intelligence. Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09668-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09668-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09667-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09668-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics