Abstract
This paper will look at the various predictions that have been made about AI and propose decomposition schemas for analysing them. It will propose a variety of theoretical tools for analysing, judging and improving these predictions. Focusing specifically on timeline predictions (dates given by which we should expect the creation of AI), it will show that there are strong theoretical grounds to expect predictions to be quite poor in this area. Using a database of 95 AI timeline predictions, it will show that these expectations are born out in practice: expert predictions contradict each other considerably, and are indistinguishable from non-expert predictions and past failed predictions. Predictions that AI lie 15 to 25 years in the future are the most common, from experts and non-experts alike.
The authors wish to acknowledge the help and support of the Singularity Institute, the Future of Humanity Institute and the James Martin School, as well as the individual advice of Nick Bostrom, Luke Muelhauser, Vincent Mueller, Anders Sandberg, Lisa Makros, Sean O’Heigeartaigh, Daniel Dewey, Eric Drexler and the online community of Less Wrong.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Turing, A.: Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 433–460 (1950)
Jacquette, D.: Metamathematical criteria for minds and machines. Erkenntnis 27(1) (1987)
Darrach, B.: Meet Shakey, the first electronic person. Reflections of the Future (1970)
Hall, J.S.: Further reflections on the timescale of AI. In: Dowe, D.L. (ed.) Solomonoff Festschrift. LNCS, vol. 7070, pp. 174–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Hanson, R.: What if uploads come first: The crack of a future dawn. Extropy 6(2) (1994)
Sandberg, A.: Whole brain emulations: A roadmap. Future of Humanity Institute Technical Report 2008-3 (2008)
Deutsch, D.: The very laws of physics imply that artificial intelligence must be possible. What’s holding us up? Aeon (2012)
Omohundro, S.: Basic ai drives. In: Proceedings of the First AGI Conference, vol. 171 (2008)
Moore, G.: Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8) (1965)
Kurzweil, R.: The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. Viking Adult (1999)
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farra, Straus and Giroux (2011)
Carnap, R.: The Logical Structure of the World (1928)
Searle, J.: Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3), 417–457 (1980)
Schmidhuber, J.: Artificial General Intelligence, pp. 177–200 (2006)
Nagel, T.: What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review 83(4), 435–450 (1974)
Lucas, J.: Minds, machines and Gödel. Philosophy XXXVI, 112–127 (1961)
Schopenhauer, A.: The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (1831)
Edmonds, B.: The social embedding of intelligence. In: Parsing the Turing Test, pp. 211–235. Springer, Netherlands (2009)
Wolpert, D., Macready, W.: No free lunch theorems for search (1995)
Plato: The Republic (380 BC)
Fallis, D.: Intentional gaps in mathematical proofs. Synthese 134(1-2) (2003)
Routley, R., Meyer, R.: Dialectical logic, classical logic, and the consistency of the world. Studies in East European Thought 16(1-2) (1976)
Morgan, M., Henrion, M.: Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press (1990)
Hanson, R.: Economics of brain emulations. In: Unnatrual Selection - The Challenges of Engineering Tomorrow’s People, pp. 150–158 (2008)
Shanteau, J.: Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 53, 252–266 (1992)
Kahneman, D., Klein, G.: Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist 64(6), 515–526 (2009)
Grove, W., Zald, D., Lebow, B., Snitz, B., Nelson, C.: Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment 12, 19–30 (2000)
Tetlock, P.: Expert political judgement: How good is it? How can we know? (2005)
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., Ross, M.: Exploring the planning fallacy: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 366–381 (1994)
Riemann, B.: Über die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Grösse. Monatsberichte der Berliner Akademie (1859)
Waltz, D.: The prospects for building truly intelligent machines. Daedalus 117(1) (1988)
Good, J.: The scientist speculates: An anthology of partly-baked ideas. Heinemann (1962)
Armstrong, S.: Chaining god: A qualitative approach to AI, trust and moral systems (2007) (online article)
Bostrom, N.: How long before superintelligence? International Journal of Futures Studies 2 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Armstrong, S., Sotala, K. (2015). How We’re Predicting AI – or Failing to. In: Romportl, J., Zackova, E., Kelemen, J. (eds) Beyond Artificial Intelligence. Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09668-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09668-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09667-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09668-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)