Skip to main content

Metadata

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Elements of Knowledge Organization
  • 2581 Accesses

Abstract

Metadata are descriptive terms that are applied to information resources, primarily for the purpose of facilitating retrieval. If I say this book is red, and you ask the system for a red book, a match will occur and everybody is happy. Were that the problem were actually so simple. In fact, metadata are used in a variety of ways in resource description and thus potentially play different roles in knowledge organization. Let us begin with a simple example, a citation for a monograph, formulated according to the Chicago Manual of Style:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barthes, Roland. 1975. The pleasure of the text; trans. by Richard Miller with a note on the text by Richard Howard. New York: Noonday Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, Michael K. 1997. What is a document? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48: 804–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraioli, Leatrice. 2005. An exploratory study of metadata creation in a health care agency. Cataloging & classification quarterly 40n3/4: 75–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, MIchel. 1984. What is an author? In Foucault reader ed. P. Rabinow. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 101–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Jane. 2005. Understanding metadata and metadata schemes. Cataloging and classification quarterly 40n3/4: 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjørland. Birger. 1997. Information seeking and subject representation: an activity-theoretical approach to information science. New directions in information management 34. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjørland, Birger. 2003. Fundamentals of knowledge organization. Knowledge organization 30: 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, Lynne. 2000. Designing a “human understandable” metalevel ontology for enhancing resource discovery in knowledge bases. In Beghtol, Clare, Lynne C. Howarth and Nancy J. Williamson, eds., Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization, Proceedings of the Sixth International ISKO Conference 10–13 July 2000 Toronto, Canada. Würzburg: ERGON Verlag, pp. 391–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, Lynne C. 2003. Designing a common namespace for searching metadata-enabled knowledge repositories: an international perspective. Cataloging & classification quarterly 37n1/2: 173–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, Lynne C. 2005. Metadata and bibliographic control: soul-mates or two solitudes? Cataloging & classification quarterly 40n3/4: 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, Lynne C., Hannaford, Julie, and Cronin, Christopher. 2002. Designing a metadata-enabled namespace for accessing resources across domains. In Howarth, Lynne C., Christopher Cronin, and Anna T. Slawek, eds. Advancing knowledge, expanding horizons for information science: proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science 30 May-01 June 2002, Faculty of Information Studies, University of Toronto. Toronto: Canadian Association for Information Science, pp. 223–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, Lynne C. and Miller, Thea. 2006. Visualizing search results from metadata-enabled repositories in cultural domains. In Maicher, Lutz and Park, Jack eds. Charting the topic maps research and applications landscape: First International Workshop on Topic Maps Research and Applications, TMRA 2005, Leipzig, Germany, October 2005. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 263–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Library Associations. 1998. Functional requirements for bibliographic records. UBCIM publications–new series 19. München: K.G. Saur. http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.htm or http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf

  • Lubetzky, Seymour. 1969. Principles of cataloging: final report. Phase IL Descriptive Cataloging. Los Angeles: Institute of Library Research, pp. 11–15. [Reprinted in Carpenter, Michael and Elaine Svenonius eds. 1985. Foundations of cataloging: a sourcebook. Littleton, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, pp. 189–91.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Steven J. 2011. Metadata for digital collections. : a how to do it manual. New York: Neal-Schuman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizzi, Antonio. [1848] 1985. Mr. Panizzi to the Right Hon. the Earl of Ellesmere.—British Museum, January 29, 1848. Reprinted from Appendix to the report of the commissioner appointed to inquire into the constitution and management of the British Museum. In Carpenter, Michael and Svenonius, Elaine eds., Foundations of descriptive cataloging. Littleton, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, pp. 18–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiraglia, Richard P. 2001a. The nature of a ‘work’: implications for the organization of knowledge. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiraglia, Richard P. 2001b. Works as signs, symbols, and canons: the epistemology of the work. Knowledge organization 28: 192–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiraglia, Richard P. 2006. Empiricism as the basis for metadata categorization: expanding the case for instantiation with archival documents. In Budin, Gerhard, Christian Swertz and Konstantin Mitgutsch, eds. Knowledge organization and the global learning society; proceedings of the 9th ISKO International Conference, Vienna, July 4–7 2006. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, pp. 383–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiraglia, Richard P. 2007a. The “works” phenomenon and best selling books. Cataloging and classification quarterly 44n3/4: 179–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiraglia, Richard P. 2007b. Bibliographic families and superworks. In Taylor, Arlene G. ed. Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited, pp. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiraglia, Richard P. 2008. A meta-analysis of instantiation as a phenomenon of information objects. Culture del testo e del documento 9n°25: 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiraglia, Richard P. and Lee, Hur-Li. 2012. Rethinking the authorship principle. Library Trends 61 no. 1: 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiraglia, Richard P., Hur-Li Lee and Hope A. Olson. 2010. The flimsy fabric of authorship. In V. Nesset, Ménard, E. and Mas, S., eds., Information science: Synergy through diversity: Proceedings of the 38th Annual CAIS/ACSI conference, June 2–4, 2010, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Toronto: CAIS. Available http://www.cais-acsi.ca/conf_proceedings_2010.htm.

  • Smiraglia, Richard P., Hur-Li Lee and Hope A. Olson. 2011. Epistemic presumptions of authorship. In iConference 2011, inspiration, integrity, and intrepidity (February 8–11, 2011). New York: ACM, pp. 137–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenonius, Elaine. 2000. The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Patrick. [1987] 1989. The second objective. In The conceptual foundations of descriptive cataloging, ed. by Elaine Svenonius, 5-16. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smiraglia, R.P. (2014). Metadata. In: The Elements of Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09357-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09357-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09356-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09357-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics