Skip to main content

Anatomy Considerations in Robotic Surgery

  • Chapter
Robotic Approaches to Colorectal Surgery

Abstract

From Ancient Greece through modern surgical practice, anatomical knowledge has remained of utmost importance. Surgery, more than any other field, relies heavily on this framework to both diagnose and treat patients. Despite the fundamental basis for anatomic knowledge in surgery, many teaching institutions are placing less and less emphasis on gross anatomy coursework. For those without a strong fund of anatomic knowledge, unfamiliarity with minimally invasive visualization of structures may produce angst. As critical structures in abdominal procedures appear different in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches, one should always establish familiar orientation depending upon modality used. This chapter seeks to demonstrate relevant colorectal anatomy from a robotic perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Excellence. NNIfHaC. NICE implementation and uptake report: laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. March 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson CN, Chen GJ, Balentine CJ, et al. Minimally invasive surgery is underutilized for colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(5):1412–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rea JD, Cone MM, Diggs BS, Deveney KE, Lu KC, Herzig DO. Utilization of laparoscopic colectomy in the United States before and after the clinical outcomes of surgical therapy study group trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254(2):281–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramamoorthy S, Obias V. Unique complications of robotic colorectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(1):273–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lasser MS, Patel CK, Elsamra SE, Renzulli 2nd JF, Haleblian GE, Pareek G. Dedicated robotics team reduces pre-surgical preparation time. Indian J Urol. 2012;28(3):263–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Einarsson JI, Hibner M, Advincula AP. Side docking: an alternative docking method for gynecologic robotic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;4(3–4):123–5.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd D. Francone M.D., M.P.H. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kasten, K.R., Francone, T.D. (2015). Anatomy Considerations in Robotic Surgery. In: Ross, H., Lee, S., Champagne, B., Pigazzi, A., Rivadeneira, D. (eds) Robotic Approaches to Colorectal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09120-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09120-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09119-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09120-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics