Skip to main content

GIS Based, Heuristic Approach for Pipeline Route Corridor Selection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 6

Abstract

Large diameter pipeline systems play an increasingly important role in the supply of population and economy with natural resources like oil, gas and water all over the world. Due to the fact that the sources are often located far off from the consumer, pipeline systems consequently have to cross large distances, facing various social, environmental and geological constraints along their route. Therefore pipeline route selection is a constraint based corridor selection and narrowing process. With the first definition of the project corridor and the successive narrowing of this corridor down to the corridor of interest decisive milestones of the final pipeline alignment are set, which, if at all possible, can only be modified with extensive timely and economic effort during later project stages. On the other hand pipeline routing teams are increasingly confronted with an extensive amount of data and ever tighter project schedules specified by the pipeline owner. In order to cope with the enormous amount of data in short time and to define a safe and economic route corridor in a transparent and traceable way, not only for the client but also for lenders, authorities, stakeholders, NGOs, etc. a GIS based, heuristic pipeline corridor selection approach was developed for the Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project (in the following referred to as TANAP) in close cooperation of engineering geologists, routing engineers and GIS experts. The process is a desktop based procedure including data collection, classification and above all their spatial evaluation utilizing GIS technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avtar R et al (2011) Landslide susceptibility zonation study using remote sensing and GIS technology in the Ken-Betwa River Link area, India. Bull Eng Geol Environ 70:595–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais-Stevens A et al (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the sea to sky transportation corridor, British Columbia, Canada: comparison of two methods. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:447–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esri (2012) ArcGIS 10.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydelko PJ, Wilkey PL (1994) GIS least-cost analysis approach for sitting gas pipeline ROWs. Technical Information Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank TANAP in general and Mr. Sinan Elaslan in particular for the permission and support to publish this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ludwig Schwarz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schwarz, L., Robl, K., Wakolbinger, W., Mühling, H., Zaradkiewicz, P. (2015). GIS Based, Heuristic Approach for Pipeline Route Corridor Selection. In: Lollino, G., et al. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09060-3_48

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics