Skip to main content

Divided Europe? Euroscepticism in Central, Eastern and Southern Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The European Union in Crisis

Abstract

European integration is at the crossroads. A growing divide in terms of politics, society, economy and culture is emerging in the European Union. The peripheralization of central, eastern and southern Europe after 2008 due to the finance crisis has changed the perception of merits of being member of European Union. A growing instrumental Eurosecpticism has become more prominent in most central, eastern and southern European countries. Although the divide between core and periphery Europe became more prominent after 2008, this chapter argues that a divergence between rich and poor countries started already at the beginning of the millennium. The cleavage between rich net payer member-states and poor net receivers has certainly contributed to the consolidation of a centre-periphery divide.

After delineating the objective transformation of the discourse or discourses among the member-states at the European level, a discussion of what is Euroscepticism and which kinds of the phenomenon exists in the present national debates. Here the literature related to the conceptualization by Paul Taggart and Alex Sczerbiak will be reviewed and discussed. The chapter argues that a large part of Euroscepticism is instrumental and related to the negative impact of the austerity policies of the European Union. The austerity policies of the EU have exposed the myth that the EU could be instrumentalised to transform ailing socioeconomic structures. The EU as vincolo esterno has changed from a soft touch approach of transformation to a hard one. This clearly alienated many populations from the EU. The chapter will address this change of mood and how it is being instrumentalised by more radical groups such as Golden Dawn in Greece and Jobbik in Hungary to return to nationalist policies. In spite of differences, Euroscepticism has become a phenomenon in central, eastern and southern European countries. However, the chapter will also try to delineate different groups of countries and the level of Euroscepticism in each one of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, D., Gamble, A., Randall, N., & Seawright, D. (2008). Euroscepticism in the British Party System: A source of fascination, perplexity, and sometimes frustration. In S. Aleks & P. Taggart (Eds.), Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism (Case Studies and Country Survey, Vol. 1, pp. 93–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S. (2005). Restructuring Europe. Centre formation, system building, and politicalstructuring between the nation state and the European Union. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blazyca, G., & Kolkiewicz, M. (1999). Poland and the EU: Internal disputes, domestic politics and accession. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 15(4), 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordandini, P. (2013). Renewal and tradition: Comparing Italian radical left parties through their middle-level elites. South European Society and Politics, 18(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous, G., & Christophorou, C. (2013). A society within society: Linkage in the case of the Cypriot Communist Party. South European Society and Politics, 18(1), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti, N., Cotta, M., & Tavares de Almeida, P. (2010). Southern Europe: A distinctive and more Pro-European Region in the EU? South European Society and Politics, 15(1), 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, P., & Trenz, J. (2013). Denouncing European integration: Euroscepticism as polity contestation. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(4), 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, D. (2004). Europe Recast. A History of the European Union. Basingstroke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, K., & Featherstone, K. (1996). Italy and EMU as a vincolo esterno: Empowering the technocrats, transforming the state. South European Society and Politics, 1, 2(Autumn), 272–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euractiv (2013a). ‘Romania tells EU: ‘We are ready for Schengen when you are’ Published 05 December 2013, http://www.euractiv.com/justice/romania-older-members-ready-sche-news-532132 accessed on 19 January 2014.

  • Euractiv (2013b), Eurozone leaders snub Cyprus ‘request for new bailout terms’ Published 20 June 2013, http://www.euractiv.com/euro-finance/cyprus-request-bailout-overhaul-news-528727

  • Eurobarometer (2013). Standard nr. 80. Fieldwork in November 2013, Publication December 2013, European Commission:Office of Official Publication of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  • European Barometer-European Parliament (2009). European Post-Election Survey 2009. Special Eurobarometer 302. European Parliament June 2009 posted at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdf/eurobarometre/28_07/VolumeA.pdf accessed on 20 January 2014.

  • Hanley, S. (2004a). From Neo-Liberalism to National interests: Ideology, strategy and party development in the euroscepticism of the Czech right. East European Politics and Societies, 18(3), 513–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, S. (2004b). Blue Velvet: the rise and decline of the new Czech right. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 20(3), 28–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, R. (2004). Introduction: Euroscepticism and the evolution of European political debate. In: R. Harmsen, M. Spiering (eds.), Euroscepticism: Party Politics, National Identity and European Integration. Special issue of European Studies, vol. 20 (pp. 13–25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilz, W. (2013). Von “Merkozy” zu “Merkollande”? Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 1–3, 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S., & Hylland, B. (2011). The political system of the European Union (3rd ed.). Basingstroke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multilevel governance and European integration. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2012). World Economic Outlook, October 2012. Coping with high debt and sluggish growth. Washington, D.C.: IMF posted at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/pdf/text.pdf accessed on 2 December 2012.

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2013a). Greece: Ex Post Evaluation of Exceptional Access under the 2010 Stand-By Arrangement, IMF Country Report, 13/156. June posted at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2013/cr13156.pdf accessed on 6 October 2013.

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2013b). Greece: Third Review Under the Extended Arrangement Under the Extended Fund Facility—Staff Report; Staff Statement; Press Release; and Statement by the Executive, IMF Country Report,13/153, June posted at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2013/cr13153.pdf accessed on 6 October 2013.

  • Jiménez, A. M. R., & Egea de Haro, A. (2011). Spain: Euroscepticism in a Pro-European Country? South European Society and Politics, 16(01), 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, A.-C. L. (2008). Euroscepticism in Denmark. In S. Aleks & P. Taggart (Eds.), Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism, Vol. I: Case Studies and Country Survey (pp. 152–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (2003). Interdependent European Governance. In B. Kohler-Koch (Ed.), Linking EU and National Governance (pp. 10–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kopecký, P. & Mudde, C. (2002). The Two Sides of Euroscepticism. European Union Politics, 3(3), 297–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunstein,T. & Wessels, W. (2011). Die Europäische Union in der Währungskrise: Eckdaten und Schlüsselentscheidungen. in integration, 308–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leconte, C. (2010). Understanding Euroscepticism. Basingstroke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibfried, S., & Zürn, M. (Eds.). (2005). Transformations of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippert, B. (2003). Von Kopenhagen bis Kopenhagen: Eine erste Bilanz der EU-Erweiterungsperspektive. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B1–2, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisi, M. (2013). Rediscovering Civil Society? Renewal and continuity in the Portuguese radical left. South European Society and Politics, 18(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, M. C., & Magalhães, P. C. (2011). Room for manoeuvre: Euroscepticism in the Portuguese parties and electorate 1976–2005. South European Society and Politics, 16(01), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., & Hix, S. (1997). Political parties in the European Union. Basingstone: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lust, A. (2006). Worstward Ho. Explaining Estonian Euroskepticism. Problems of Communism, 53(5), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magone, J. (2006). The New World Architecture. The Role of the European Union in the Making of Global Governance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magone, J. M. (2010). The Role of the EEC in the Portuguese, Spanish and Greek Transitions. In D. Muro & G. Alonso (Eds.), Politics and memory of democratic transition in the case of Spain (pp. 215–235). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. (1994). Creeping competence: The expanding agenda of the European Community. Journal of Public Policy, 14(2), 95–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. (2000). The end of creeping competence? EU policy making since Maastricht. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(3), 519–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pridham, G. (2005). Designing democracy and regime change in Post-Communist Europe. Basingstroke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, D. J. (1971). Of blind men, Elephants and International Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 10(3), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramiro, L., & Verge, T. (2013). Impulse and decadence of linkage processes: Evidence from the Spanish radical left. South European Society and Politics, 18(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2010). A community of Europeans? Transnational identities and public spheres. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. A. (1990). Turbulence in World Politics. A theory of change and continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G. (1995). Jacques Delors and European integration. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, D. (2013). Deutschland und Frankreich und die Krise im Euro-Raum. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 1–3, 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikk, A. (2009). Force Mineure? The effects of the EU on party politics in a small country: The case of Estonia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 25(4), 468–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (1999). The making of EU Foreign policy: The case of Eastern Europe. Basingstroke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczerbiak, A., & Bil, M. (2009). When in doubt, (Re-)turn to domestic politics? The (Non-)impact of the EU on party politics in Poland. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 25(4), 447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. (1998). A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 33, 363–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P., & Szczerbiak, A. (2008). Introduction: Opposing Europe The politics of Euroscepticism. In A. Szcerbiak & P. Taggart (Eds.), Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism, Vol I: Case Studies and Country Survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakatika, M., & Eleftheriou, C. (2013). The radical left’s Turn towards Civil Society in Greece: One strategy, two paths. South European Society and Politics, 18(1), 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varsori, A. (2011). Italy’s European Policy. UNISCI Discussion Papers Nr.25(January 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verney, S. (2011). An exceptional case? Party and popular euroscepticism in Greece, 1959–2009. South European Society and Politics, 16(01), 51–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. (2000). The policy process: A moving pendulum. In H. Wallace & W. Wallace (Eds.), Policy making in the European Union (pp. 39–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (2008). Das politische System der Europäischen Union. Wiesbaden: Verlag Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weßels, B. (2009). Spielarten des Euroskeptizismus. In F. Decker & M. Höreth (Eds.), Die Verfassung Europas. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden, pp. 50–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José M. Magone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Magone, J.M. (2015). Divided Europe? Euroscepticism in Central, Eastern and Southern Europe. In: Demetriou, K. (eds) The European Union in Crisis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08774-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics