Skip to main content

A Modeling Approach to Support Safety Assurance in the Automotive Domain

  • Conference paper
Progress in Systems Engineering

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 366))

Abstract

As safety standards are widely used in safety-critical domains, such as ISO 26262 in the automotive domain, the use of safety cases to demonstrate product safety is stimulated. It is crucial to ensure that a safety case is both correct and clear. To support this, we proposed to make use of modeling techniques to support safety assurance in the automotive domain. Continuing on our previous work, a rule-based approach enables us to extract a conceptual model from safety standards or project guidelines. Then, by applying structured English using an SBVR vocabulary, the safety case is linked to the conceptual model, and the content of it is enforced to be well structured and controlled. The contribution of the explicit link between the safety case and the conceptual model is to reduce the ambiguity of natural language, and to increase the confidence in the claimed safety assurance. Finally, tooling is developed that enables syntax highlighting and content assistance while editing safety cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ISO 26262: “Road Vehicles – Functional Safety” (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meta Modeling Approach to Safety Standard for Consumer Devices (2013), http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/tc/agendas/ut/SysA_Slides/taguchi.pdf

  3. Safety Case Repository (2013), http://dependability.cs.virginia.edu/info/Safety Cases:Repository

  4. Afreen, H., Bajwa, I., Bordbar, B.: SBVR2UML: A Challenging Transformation. In: Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT), 2011. pp. 33–38 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bajwa, I.S., G. Lee, M., Bordbar, B.: SBVR Business Rules Generation from Natural Language Specification. In: AAAI 2011 Spring Symposium - AI for Business Agility. pp. 2–8. San Francisco, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cabot, J., Pau, R., Raventós, R.: From UML/OCL to {SBVR} specifications: A challenging transformation. Information Systems 35(4), 417–440 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ceponiene, L., Nemuraite, L., Vedrickas, G.: Semantic Business Rules in Service Oriented Development of Information Systems. In: 15th International Conference on Information and Software Technologies, IT. pp. 404–416 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, R.: Safety Case Development as an Information Modelling Problem. In: Dale, C., Anderson, T. (eds.) Safety-Critical Systems: Problems, Process and Practice, pp. 183–193. Springer London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, Y., Van den Brand, M., Engelen, L., M. Favaro, J., Klabbers, M., Sartori, G.: Extracting models from iso 26262 for reusable safety assurance. In: Safe and Secure Software Reuse - 13th International Conference on Software Reuse. vol. 7925, pp. 192–207. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nemuraite, L., Skersys, T., Sukys, A., Sinkevicius, E., Ablonskis, L.: VETIS tool for editing and transforming SBVR business vocabularies and business rules into UML&OCL models. In: 16th International Conference on Information and Software Technologies, Kaunas: Kaunas University of Technology. pp. 377–384 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Njonko, P., El Abed, W.: From Natural Language Business Requirements to Executable Models via SBVR. In: Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), 2012 International Conference on. pp. 2453–2457 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. OMG: SBVR: Semantics Of Business Vocabulary And Rules (Sepetember 2013), http://www.omg.org/spec/SBVR/1.1

  13. Spreeuwenberg, S., Healy, K.A.: SBVR’s Approach to Controlled Natural Language. In: Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Controlled natural language. pp. 155–169. CNL’09, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. T.Kelly: Arguing Safety - A Systematic Approach to Managing Safety Cases. Ph.D. thesis, University Of York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson, S., Kelly, T., McDermid, J.: Safety Case Development: Current Practice, Future Prospects. In: Shaw, R. (ed.) Safety and Reliability of Software Based Systems, pp. 135–156. Springer London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the FP7 programme under grant agreement no 289011 (OPENCOSS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaping Luo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Luo, Y., van den Brand, M., Engelen, L., Klabbers, M. (2015). A Modeling Approach to Support Safety Assurance in the Automotive Domain. In: Selvaraj, H., Zydek, D., Chmaj, G. (eds) Progress in Systems Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 366. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08422-0_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08422-0_50

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08421-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08422-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics