Abstract
While multiculturalism lost popular support in Europe, it gained public interest and policy attention in Northeast Asia, particularly in South Korea since the 1990s. Korea accepted multiculturalism discourse and policy with great enthusiasm. Given a small number of immigrants, especially a smaller number of permanent residents, the enthusiasm for multiculturalism that Korean people have shown so far is quite surprising and unusual. The drive behind a multiculturalism fad was possible because it was thought to be politically correct and was regarded as synonym for globalization and advancement, a step toward joining the ranks of advanced nations. The Korean approach to multiculturalism has several distinctive characteristics. First, multiculturalism and migrant integration are not clearly distinguished, and terms, such as multicultural policy, multiculturalism policy, foreign policy, and immigration policy, are often used almost synonymously and interchangeably. Second, the main target group or beneficiary of the government’s migrant integration policy is people in international marriages and their children. Migrant workers, who account for a larger share of immigrants in Korea, are not considered a major clientele of migrant integration programs. Ethnic Chinese, who have lived in Korean soil for many generations, are not even considered a relevant target group that the government needs to take care of. Third, most migrant integration policies and programs aim at assimilating immigrants to Korean culture and society rather than accepting cultures and identities of immigrant groups. Fourth, the Korean people and society as a whole are pretty sympathetic toward immigrants, especially toward female marriage migrants and their children. Because of the general public’s positive and benevolent attitudes toward immigrants, the Korean government allocated a generous budget for migrant integration programs. Fifth, because immigrants and ethnic minorities are not numerous and non-threatening and had arrived in Korea in different time periods, the Korean society has responded to each group in a separate manner. The group-specific approach has not only created fissures among migrants, but has also amplified prejudices and stereotypes, even antagonism and conflict among migrants and natives. Thus, in the future, government support ought to be provided to people equally, not according to their particular background information and identity, but according to their needs as determined by universal standards such as social class and risk factors (familial dissolution, sickness, and unemployment).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaha, T. (2010). International migration and multicultural coexistence in Japan: Resistance and accommodation to change. Journal of Asiatic Studies, 53(2), 57–101.
Back, L., Keith, M., Shukra, A., & Solomos, J. (2002). New labour’s white heart: Politics, multiculturalism and the return of assimilation. Political Quarterly, 73(4), 445–454.
Befu, H. (2001). Hegemony of homogeneity: An anthropological analysis of nihonjinron. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Bouchard, G. (2011). What is interculturalism? McGill Law Journal, 56, 435–468.
Burgess, C. (1997). Multicultural Japan? Discourse and the ‘myth’ of homogeneity. The discourse(s) of migration: Changing constructions of the other since 9/11. Kokusai Kankeigaku Kenkyu (The Study of International Relations, Tsuda College), 33 (March). Posted on Japan Focus, 24 March 2007.
Cheng, L. (2003). Transnational labor, citizenship and the Taiwan state. In A. Rosett, L. Cheng, & M. Y. K. Woo (Eds.), East Asian law: Universal norms and local cultures (pp. 85–104). London: Routledge Curzon.
Entzinger, H. (2003). The rise and fall of multiculturalism in the Netherlands. In C. Joppke & E. Morawska (Eds.), Toward assimilation and citizenship: Immigrants in liberal nation-states (pp. 59–86). London: Palgrave.
Hays, J. (2013). Foreigners in Japan. http://factsanddetails.com/japan/cat18/sub119/item633.html. Accessed 13 April 2013.
Joppke, C. (2010). Citizenship and immigration. UK: Polity Press.
Kim, A. E. (2010). Korean multiculturalism: The genealogy of the concept, shifting meanings, issues and implications. Journal of Asistic Studies, 53(2), 102–129.
Kim, H. J. N. (2007). Government-led multiculturalism of Korea: Theories of multiculturalism and their applications in Korea. In K. S. Oh (Ed.), Multiculturalism in South Korea—current conditions and issues (pp. 58–79). Seoul: Hanul Academy.
Kim, H. R., & Oh, I. (2012). Foreigners cometh!: Paths to multiculturalism in Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 21(1), 105–133.
Kim, H. S. (2006). The principles and process of nation formation in contemporary Korean society. Korean Journal of Social Issues, 7(2), 77–106.
Kim, Y. S., Kim, I. S., Lee, C. H., & Park, J. K. (2008). Situation of cultural policy for transition to multicultural society and development plans. Seoul: Korean Women’s Development Institute.
Koopmans, R., Statham, P., Guigni, M., & Passy, F. (2005). Contested citizenship: Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kymlicka, W. (2010). The rise and fall of multiculturalism?: New debates on inclusion and accommodation in diverse societies. International Social Science Journal, 61(199), 97–112.
Lee, E. G. (2010). Recent developments in Japan’s policy on resident foreigners: Changes and consistency. Korean Journal for Japanese Studies, 31, 1–30.
Lee, H. K. (2012). Evaluation of multicultural social cohesion policy of the central government and plans for policy linkage and coordination. Paper presented at the Open Forum on the Multicultural Social Cohesion Policy of Korea, Press Center, Seoul, Korea, 30 Oct.
Levey, G. B. (2012). Interculturalism vs. multiculturalism: A distinction without a difference?. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(2), 217–224.
Lie, J. (2001). Multiethnic Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Moon, J. A. (2012). Multicultural coexistence policy of Japan and examination of multicultural education at the local cmmunity. Korean Journal of the Japan Education, 16(2), 21–42.
Parekh, B. (2006). Rethinking multiculturalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Seol, D. H. (2009). A reflective approach to the multicultural discourse in Korean society. Paper presented at the international conference on identity and diversity of the ‘East Asian World’ from a historical perspective, Hotel Grand Hilton, Seoul, Korea, 6–7 November.
Shim, B. S. (2007). Formation and transformation of migrant worker policy—analysis of multiculturalist policy in Korea. Discourse 201, 10(2), 41–76.
Soysal, Y. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tseng, Y. F. (2008). Marriage migration to East Asia: Current issues and propositions in making comparisons. In W. S. Yang & M. C. W. Lu (Eds.), Cross-border marriage migration in East and Southeast Asia: Socio-demographic patterns and issues (pp. 31–48). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Wang, L. J. (2003). Towards multiculturalism? Identity, difference and citizenship in cultural policy in Taiwan (1949–2002). Ph.D. thesis at the University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Wang, L. J. (2007). Cultural rights and diversity in cultural policy: Taiwan and China. Unpublished manuscript. Yuan Ze University, Chung-li, Taiwan.
Weiner, M. (Ed.). (1997). Japan’s minorities: The illusion of homogeneity. London: Routledge.
Wright, M., & Bloemraad, I. (2012). Is there a trade-off between multiculturalism and socio-political integration? Policy regimes and immigrant incorporation in comparative perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 77–95.
Yamanaka, K. (2010). Civil society and social movements for immigrant rights in Japan and South Korea: Convergence and divergence in unskilled immigration policy. Korea Observer, 41, 615–647.
Yoon, I. J. (2010). Multicultural minority groups and multicultural coexistence in Korean society. Korea Observer, 41(4), 517–557.
Yoon, I. J., & Song, Y. H. (2011). South Koreans’ perceptions of national identity and acceptance of multiculturalism. Journal of Unification Affairs, 23(1), 143–192.
Yoon, I. J., Song, Y. H., Kim, S. D., & Song, J. Y. (2010). South Koreans’ perceptions of migrant workers and multicultural society. Paju: Korean Studies Information.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yoon, IJ. (2014). From a Migrant Integration of Distinction to a Multiculturalism of Inclusion. In: Battistella, G. (eds) Global and Asian Perspectives on International Migration. Global Migration Issues, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08317-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08317-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08316-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08317-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)