Skip to main content

The Collider Detector at the Fermilab Tevatron

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CP Violation in {B_s}^0 -> J/psi.phi Decays

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 316 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a concise description of the Tevatron collider and of the CDF II detector. More details are provided on the tracking and muon detector systems, on account of their importance in the present analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The form factor \(F\) is a parameterization of the longitudinal profile of the beams in the collision region, which assumes the characteristic shape of an horizontal “hourglass” centered at the interaction point. The betatron function is a parameter convenient for solving the equation of motion of a particle through an arbitrary beam transport system; \(\beta ^\star \) is a local function of the magnetic properties of the ring and it is independent of the accelerating particle. The emittance \(\epsilon \) measures the phase space occupied by the particles of the beam; three independent two-dimensional emittances are defined, for each of them \(\sqrt{\beta ^\star \epsilon }\) is proportional to the statistical width of the beam in the corresponding phase plane.

  2. 2.

    Typically, 21 antiprotons were collected for each 106 protons on target, resulting in a stacking rate of approximately 10–20 \(\mathrm {mA/h}\).

  3. 3.

    Stochastic cooling is a technique used to reduce the transverse momentum and energy spread of a beam without beam loss. This is achieved by applying iteratively a feedback mechanism that senses the beam deviation from the ideal orbit with electrostatic plates, processes and amplifies it, and transmits an adequately-sized synchronized correction pulse to another set of plates downstream [3]. Bunch rotation is an RF manipulation technique that, using adequate phasing, transforms a beam with a large time spread and a small energy spread in a beam with a large energy spread and a small time spread, or viceversa.

  4. 4.

    Electron cooling is a method of damping the transverse motion of the antiproton beam through the interaction with an electron beam propagating together at the same average velocity.

  5. 5.

    Coalescing is the process of compacting into one dense bunch many smaller bunches.

  6. 6.

    The rapidity can be derived from the Lorentz-invariant cross-section: \(E\frac{d^{3}\sigma }{(dp)^{3}}= E\frac{d^{2}\sigma }{\pi p_\mathrm{{T}}dp_\mathrm{{T}}dp_{z}}\). Observing that only \(E\) and \(p_{z}\) change under \(z\) boosts, we can replace them by a variable \(Y\) such as \(E\frac{dY}{dp_{z}}=1\). Solving for \(Y\) we get Eq. (3.1).

  7. 7.

    An idea of the difference is given by considering that \(|\eta _\mathrm{{det}} - \eta _{part}|\approx 0.2\) if the particle is produced at \(z = 60\) cm from the nominal interaction point.

  8. 8.

    The symbol \(X_0\) indicates the radiation length.

  9. 9.

    The cooling fluid is maintained under the atmospheric pressure to prevent leaks in case of damaged cooling pipes.

  10. 10.

    Gold, used also for the wires, was chosen because of its good conductivity, high work function, resistance to etching by positive ions, and low chemical reactivity.

  11. 11.

    In the presence of crossed electric (\(\varvec{E}\)) and magnetic (\(\varvec{B}\)) fields, electrons drifting in a gas move at an angle \(\zeta \) with respect to the electric field direction, given by \(\zeta \approx \arctan \left( \frac{v(E,B\,=\,0)B}{kE}\right) \), where \(v(E,B\,=\,0)\) is the drift velocity without a magnetic field, and \(k\) is a \(\mathcal {O}(1)\) empirical parameter that depends on the gas and on the electric field. A common solution for this problem consists in using tilted cells (i. e. tilted drift electric field) that compensate the Lorentz angle linearizing the time-to-distance relation.

  12. 12.

    A jet is a flow of observable secondary particles produced in a spatially collimated form, as a consequence of the hadronization of partons produced in the hard collision.

  13. 13.

    The \(\delta \)-rays are knock-on electrons emitted from atoms when the passage of charged particles through matter results in transmitted energies of more than a few \({\mathrm {ke}}{\mathrm {V}}\) in a single collision.

References

  1. S. D. Holmes (ed.), Tevatron Run II Handbook (FERMILAB-TM-2484, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Holmes, R.S. Moore, V. Shiltsev, Overview of the Tevatron collider complex: goals, operations and performance (2011), arXiv:1106.0909 (physics.acc-ph)

  3. D. Mohl et al., Physics and technique of Stochastic cooling. Phys. Rept. 58, 73 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Nagaitsev et al., Experimental demonstration of relativistic electron cooling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 044801 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Blair et al. (CDF Collaboration), The CDF II Detector: Technical Design Report (FERMILAB-DESIGN-1996-01, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.S. Hill (On behalf of the CDF Collaboration), Operational experience and performance of the CDF II silicon detector. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A530(1) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Sill (CDF Collaboration), CDF Run II silicon tracking projects. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A447(1) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.A. Affolder et al. (CDF Collaboration), Intermediate silicon layers detector for the CDF experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A453, 84 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.A. Affolder et al. (CDF Collaboration), CDF central outer tracker. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A526, 249 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Acosta et al. (CDF Collaboration), A time-of-flight detector in CDF II. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A518, 605 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Ascoli et al., CDF Central Muon Detector. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A268, 33 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Ginsburg (on behalf of the CDF Collaboration), CDF Run 2 muon system. Eur. Phys. J. C33, S1002 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Gatti, Performance of the new tracking system at CDF II, Ph.D. thesis, University of Pisa, available as FERMILAB-THESIS-2001-23, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Menzemer, Track reconstruction in the silicon vertex detector of the CDF II experiment, Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruhe University, available as FERMILAB-THESIS-2003-52, IEKP-KA-2003-04, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.P. Hays et al., Inside-out tracking at CDF. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A538, 249 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Gerchtein, M. Paulini, CDF detector simulation framework and performance, eConf C0303241, TUMT005 (2003), arXiv:physics/0306031 (physics)

  17. R. Brun, R. Hagelberg, M. Hansroul, J. Lassalle, GEANT: Simulation program for particle physics experiment. User guide and reference manual (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  18. P.A. Movilla Fernandez (CDF Collaboration), Performance of the CDF calorimeter simulation in Tevatron Run II, in Proceedings of AIP Conference 867, 487 (2006), arXiv:physics/0608081

  19. R. Veenhof, Garfield, recent developments. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A419, 726 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Gold, Description of the parameterized charge deposition model. CDF Note 5871 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabato Leo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leo, S. (2015). The Collider Detector at the Fermilab Tevatron. In: CP Violation in {B_s}^0 -> J/psi.phi Decays. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07929-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics