Skip to main content

Risk Management Through Process Monitoring: Reducing Uncertainty and Improving Risk Assessment Effectiveness Through Knowledge Gathering Over Time

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risk Management in Architectural Design

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSPOLIMI))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to propose the use of process monitoring on buildings to gain continuous feedback from the use, for both monitoring risks and learning by use. During this phase the actual performance of what has been predicted is measured in order to check the quality of forecasts. Eventual differences between performance expected and these measured would call either for a review on previsions, or for an intervention on the object measured. For monitoring of building performance data and the possibility for more data abounds but currently only few are the organizations prepared to actually gather the available information and use it for building management. Moreover monitoring techniques on building are often techniques to punctually check the level of performances and not actual continuous monitoring of them. To establish a system of building continuous monitoring that allows ready response, the systems of monitoring of processes can be adopted. Three examples of real-time monitoring and responding system, based on a monitoring of process, are reported from projects of the MIT | Senseable City Laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mathematical methods: mathematical models are, in general theoretical models that simulate the performance object for verification. For example models to test behavior under load of structures.

  2. 2.

    Verification methods: are methods to verify the presence of provisions in respect to precise requirements.

  3. 3.

    Subjective methods for test statistics: they are “investigations Doxa” verification methods. Evaluate, with appropriate techniques, the degree of satisfaction of a sample of users with regard to determining performance of the building product.

  4. 4.

    Source: http://senseable.mit.edu/enel/.

References

  • E. Brandt, M.H. Rasmussen, Assessment of building conditions. Energy Build. 34(2), 121–125 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Brunetti, Lezioni di tecniche di indagine non distruttive e monitoraggio (Politecnico di Torino, Torino, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.F. Cooper, S. Grey, G. Raymond, P. Walker, Project Risk Management Guidelines: Managing Risk in Large Projects and Complex Procurements (Wiley, Chichester, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Doukas, K.D. Patlitzianas, K. Iatropoulos, J. Psarras, Intelligent building energy management system using rule sets. Build. Environ. 42, 3562–3569 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Fedele, L. Furlanetto, D. Saccardi, Progettare e gestire la manutenzione (McGraw-Hill, Milano, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kalogirou, Artificial neural networks in energy applications in buildings. Int. J. Low Carbon Technol. 1(3), 201–216 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Kolokotsa, K. Niachou, V. Geros, K. Kalaitzakis, G. Stavrakakis, M. Santamouris, Implementation of an integrated indoor environment and energy management system. Energy Build. 37(1), 93–99 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V. Manfron, P. Zennaro, Valutazione della qualità dell’edilizia residenziale pubblica nell’era veneta, in Qualità Norma e progetto (Arsenale, Venezia, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Martani, C9/Infrastructureless Parking System in Senseable City Guide to Copenhagen 2 (DUSP, MIT. SA + P press, Cambridge, 2011), pp. 51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Martani, D. Lee, P. Robinson, R. Britter, C. Ratti, ENERNET: Studying the dynamic relationship between building occupancy and energy consumption. Energy Build. 47, 584–591 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Morabito, A. Nesti, Valutare l’affidabilità in edilizia (Gangemi editore, Roma, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Pedro, J.A. Paiva, A.J. Vilhena, Portuguese method for building condition assessment. Struct. Surv. 26(4), 322–335 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Williams, A. Davies, P.R. Drake, Condition Based maintenance and Machine Diagnostic (Chapman & Hall, London, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

Standards and laws

  • International Organization for Standardization, 2009. ISO 31000:2009, Risk management—Principles and guidelines

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization, 2009. IEC/ISO 31010, Risk management—Risk assessment techniques

    Google Scholar 

Websites and documents available online

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Martani .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martani, C. (2015). Risk Management Through Process Monitoring: Reducing Uncertainty and Improving Risk Assessment Effectiveness Through Knowledge Gathering Over Time. In: Risk Management in Architectural Design. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07449-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07449-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07448-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07449-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics