Skip to main content

Resistance to Institutional and Organizational Change: An Individual Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Change Management and the Human Factor

Abstract

In order to answer the question, how reactions to organisational change and resistance to change differ during different stages of institutional development of country the author conducted research in more than 200 Estonian companies after two waves of organizational changes. The first took place before 2000, during the period of social transience and reinstitutionalization. The second started from 2000 in the context of more stable institutions. The results indicate, that reactions to change depend not only on previous changes, but also on the previous institutional stage. In Estonia, the long period of stagnation during the Soviet regime created the expectation of radical change. It brought about deinstitutionalization and reinstitutionalization, which together created an environment of social transience. Expectations were high and the changes demanded a lot of energy. This resulted in tiredness and a desire for stability, but instead the changes continued in the form of continuous revolutionary change. This was rather demanding and created a lot of fear and resistance. The success of companies depends on people, and people usually have more skills and abilities than are being utilized by their organizations. If organizations want more from their people, the managers should consider the institutional impact of change on the employees’ attitudes toward change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, L.S. (1986, December). Development, transition or transformation: The question of change in organisations. Organisational Development Practicioner, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alas, R., & Rees, C. J. (2006). Work-related attitudes, values and radical change in post-socialist contexts: A comparative study. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(2), 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alas, R., & Vadi, M. (2006). The impact of organizational culture on organizational learning and attitudes concerning change from an institutional perspective. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 1(1/2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluedon, A. C. (2000). Time and organizational culture. In N. M. Ashkanasy, P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture & climate (pp. 117–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, A., & Kelloway, E. K. (2004). Predicting openness and commitment to change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(5/6), 485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, E. B., & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Challenging ‘resistance to change’. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., Cummings, L. L., & Pierce, J. L. (1996). Psychological ownership in organizations: Conditions under which individuals promote or resist change. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 9, pp. 1–23). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, L. D., & Burke, W. W. (1991). Creating successful organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 19(4), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. S., Stewart, W. H., Sweo, R., & Luker, W. A. (2000). Convergence versus strategic reorientation: The ntecedents of fast-paced organizational change. Journal of Management, 26, 911–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isabella, L. (1990). Evolving Interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 7–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, D. T., Scott, C. D., & Tobe, G. R. (1994). Rekindling commitment: How to revitalize yourself, your work, and your organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D. (1993). Managing change. Cases and concepts. Boston, MA: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1989). Changing as three steps: Unfreezing, moving, and freezing of group standards. In W. L. French, C. H. Bell Jr., & R. A. Zawacki (Eds.), Organizational development. Theory, practice, and research (3rd ed., p. 87). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liuhto, K. (1999). The organisational and managerial transformation in turbulent business environments. Publications of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meaney, M., & Pung, C. (2008, August). McKinsey global results: Creating organizational transformations, McKinsey Quarterly, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, V. D., Johnson, J. R., & Grau, J. G. (1994). Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, J. B. (1978). The management process: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A. & Tushman, M. L. (1989). Organizational frame bending: Principles for managing reorientation. The Academy of Management, Executive Magazine, 3(3), 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peccei, R., Giangreco, A., & Sebastiano, A. (2011). The role of organisational commitment in the analysis of resistance to change. Personnel Review, 40(2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, R. A. (1976). Diversification strategies and organizational policies of large diversified firms. Journal of Economics and Business, 28, 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, G., & Raisch, S. (2005). Corporate Crisis: The logic of failure. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 90–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, G. & Butler, J. (1999). Why managers won’t learn. In C. Mabey, & P. Iles, (Eds.) Managing learning (pp. 34–42). London: International Thompson Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1986). Management development as a process of influence. In M. D. Richards (Ed.), Readings in management (pp. 602–618). Nashville, TN: South-Western Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, B. R. (1973). The industrial state: Old myths and new realities. Harvard Business Review, 51(2), 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1997). The fifth distcipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. Century Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, D., & Sohal, A. S. (1998). Resistance: A constructive tool for change management. Management Decision, 36(8), 543–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord, M. R. (1988). Toward a new practice theory of organization development: Notes on snapshooting and moviemaking. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 2, pp. 59–96).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Alas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alas, R. (2015). Resistance to Institutional and Organizational Change: An Individual Perspective. In: Dievernich, F., Tokarski, K., Gong, J. (eds) Change Management and the Human Factor. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07434-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics