Skip to main content

Strategies for Adaptive Model Reduction with DCA-Based Multibody Modeling of Biopolymers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multibody Dynamics

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 35))

  • 2623 Accesses

Abstract

This contribution discusses the need for adaptive model reduction when simulating biopolymeric systems and the issues surrounding the execution of these model changes in a computationally efficient manner. These systems include nucleic acids, proteins, and traditional polymers such as polyethylene. Two distinct general strategies of reducing selected degrees-of-freedom from the model are presented and the appropriateness of use is discussed. The strategies discussed herein are a momentum based approach and a velocity based approach. The momentum-based approach is derived from modeling discontinuous changes in model definition as instantaneous application (or removal) of constraints. The velocity-based approach is based on removing a degree-of-freedom when the associated generalized speed is zero. A Numerical example is included that demonstrates that both methods similarly characterize long-time conformational motion of a system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhalerao KD, Crean C, Anderson KS (2011) Hybrid complementarity formulations for robotics applications. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech (Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik) 91(5):386–399

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhalerao KD, Poursina M, Anderson KS (2009) An efficient direct differentiation approach for sensitivity analysis of flexible multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 23(2):121–140

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Carnevali P, Toth G, Toubassi G, Meshkat SN (2003) Fast protein structure prediction using Monte Carlo simulations with modal moves. J Am Chem Soc 125:14244–14245

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chakrabarty A, Cagin T (2010) Coarse grain modeling of polyimide copolymers. Polymer 51(12):2786–2794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chun HM, Padilla CE, Chin DN, Watenabe M, Karlov VI, Alper HE, Soosaar K, Blair KB, Becker OM, Caves LSD, Nagle R, Haney DN, Farmer BL (2000) MBO(N)D: a multibody method for long-time molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 21(3):159–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Featherstone R (1999) A divide-and-conquer articulated-body algorithm for parallel O(log(n)) calculation of rigid-body dynamics. Part 1: basic algorithm. Int J Rob Res 18(9):867–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Featherstone R (1999) A divide-and-conquer articulated-body algorithm for parallel O(log(n)) calculation of rigid-body dynamics. Part 2: trees, loops, and accuracy. Int J Rob Res 18(9):876–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jain A, Vaidehi N, Rodriguez G (1993) A fast recursive algorithm for molecular dynamics simulation. J Comput Phys 106(2):258–268

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan IM, Anderson KS (2013) Khan IM, Poursina M, Anderson KS (2013) Model transitions and optimization problem in multiflexible-body systems: Application to modeling molecular systems. Comput Phys Commun 184(7), 1717–1728

    Google Scholar 

  10. Malczyk P, Frączek J (2012) A divide and conquer algorithm for constrained multibody system dynamics based on augmented Lagrangian method with projections-based error correction. Nonlinear Dyn 70(1):871–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mukherjee RM, Anderson KS (2006) Orthogonal complement based divide-and-conquer algorithm for constrained multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn 48(1–2):199–215

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Mukherjee RM, Anderson KS (2007) A logarithmic complexity divide-and-conquer algorithm for multi-flexible articulated body dynamics. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 2(1):10

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Mukherjee RM, Anderson KS (2007) Efficient methodology for multibody simulations with discontinuous changes in system definition. Multibody Syst Dyn 18(2):145–168

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Mukherjee RM, Crozier PS, Plimpton SJ, Anderson KS (2008) Substructured molecular dynamics using multibody dynamics algorithms. Int J Nonlinear Mech Nonlinear Mech Dyn Macromol 43(10):1040–1055

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Padilla P, Toxvaerd S (1991) Structure and dynamical behavior of fluid n-alkanes. J Chem Phys 95(1):509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Poursina M (2011) Robust framework for the adaptive multiscale modeling of biopolymers, Ph.D. thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY

    Google Scholar 

  17. Poursina M, Bhalerao KD, Flores SC, Anderson KS, Laederach A (2011) Strategies for articulated multibody-based adaptive coarse grain simulation of RNA. Methods Enzymol 487:73–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Praprotnik M, Delle Site L, Kremer K (2005) Adaptive resolution molecular-dynamics simulation: changing the degrees of freedom on the fly. J Chem Phys 123(22):224106

    Google Scholar 

  19. Redon S, Galoppo N, Lin MC (2005) Adaptive dynamics of articulated bodies. ACM Trans Graph 24(3):936–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toxvaerd S (1989) Molecular dynamics calculation of the equation of state of liquid propane. J Chem Phys 91(6):3716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tozzini V (2005) Coarse-grained models for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15(2):144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy J. Laflin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laflin, J.J., Anderson, K.S., Khan, I.M. (2014). Strategies for Adaptive Model Reduction with DCA-Based Multibody Modeling of Biopolymers. In: Terze, Z. (eds) Multibody Dynamics. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07260-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07260-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07259-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07260-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics