Skip to main content

Design Methodology of a Complex CKC Mechanical Joint with an Energetic Representation Tool “Multibond Graph”: Application to the Helicopter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multibody Dynamics

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 35))

  • 2634 Accesses

Abstract

Due to the operation of the rotor, the helicopter is subject to important vibration levels affecting namely the fatigue of the mechanical parts and the passenger comfort. Suspensions between the main gear box (MGB) and the fuselage help to filter theses problematic vibrations. Their design can be difficult since the filtering should be efficient for different types of external forces (pumping force and roll/pitch torque) which may appear during the flight. As passive solutions classically show their limits, intelligent active solutions are proposed so that the filtering can be adjusted according to the vibration sources. Such studies still suffer from a lack of tools and methods, firstly, necessary to the design of complex mechanical systems (due to their multi-phase multi-physics multi-interaction characteristic, ...) and secondly, to develop of an intelligent joint. The main objective of this chapter is to provide a methodology for designing and analyzing an intelligent joint using an energetic representation approach: the multibond graph (MBG). This method is applied here to a complex mechanical system with closed kinematic chains (CKC) which is the joint between the main gear box (MGB) and the aircraft structure of a helicopter. Firstly, the MBG method is analyzed. Secondly, after a brief state of art of the MGB-Fuselage joint, developments focus on the 2D and 3D modeling of the MGB-Fuselage joint with a MBG approach. The 20-sim software is used to conduct the simulation of bond graph. Finally, the MBG models results are presented, illustrating the potential of the MBG tool to predict the dynamic of a complex CKC mechanical system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krysinski T, Malburet F (2006) Mechanical vibrations: active and passive control, Wiley-Iste edn edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. van Amerongen J, Breedveld P (2003) Modelling of physical systems for the design and control of mechatronc systems. Ann Rev Control 27(1):87–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tiernego MJL, Bos AM (1985) Modelling the dynamics and kinematics of mechanical systems with multibond graphs. J Franklin Inst 319:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bos AM (1986) Multibody systems in terms of multibond graphs with application to a motorcycle multibody system. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marquis-Favre W, Scavarda S (1996) Bond graph representation of multibody systems with kinematic loops. J Franklin Inst 335B(4):643–660

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.20sim.com/

  7. Afnor (2008) Mécatronique—vocabulaire, ed: French Standard NF E01–010. http://www.afnor.org/

  8. Isermann R (2008) Mechatronic systems—innovative products with embedded control. Control Eng Pract 16:14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lebrun M (2003) Simulation et CAO en automatique et mécatronique. Techniques de l’ingénieur

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jardin A (2010) Contribution à une méthodologie de dimensionnement des systèmes mécatroniques: analyse structurelle et couplage à l’optimisation dynamique. Thèse de doctorat, Electronique, Electrotechnique, Automatique EEA, INSA de Lyon, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paynter HM (1961) Analysis and design of engineering systems. MIT Press edn, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karnopp DC, Margolis DL, Rosemberg RC (2000) System dynamics—modeling and simulation of mechatronics systems. Wiley edn, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dauphin-Tanguy G (1999) Les bonds graphs et leur application en mécatronique. Techniques de l’ingénieur

    Google Scholar 

  14. Borutsky W (2010) Bond graph methodology—development and analysis of multidisciplinary dynamic system models. Springer edn, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zeid A, Chung C-H (1992) Bond graph modeling of multibody systems: a library of three-dimensional joints. J Franklin Inst 329:605–636

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Marquis-Favre W (1997) Contribution à la représentation bond graph des systèmes mécaniques multicorps. Thèse de doctorat

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verge M, Jaume D (2004) Modélisation structurée des systèmes avec les bonds graphs. Technip edn, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vaz A, Hirai S (2004) Modeling a hand prosthesis with word bond graph objects. In: Proceedings of international conference on integrated modeling and analysis in applied control and automation (IMAACA 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rideout G (2004) System partitioning and physical domain proper modeling through assessment of power-conserving model structure. Thèse de doctorat, University of Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rayman T, Rideout G, Krouglicof N (2012) Evaluation of dynamic performance of non-spherical parallel orientation manipulators through bond graph multi-body simulation. Presented at the bond graph modeling Genoa, Italy, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chan CC, Bouscayrol A, Chen K (2010) Electric, hybrid, and fuel-cell vehicles: architectures and modeling. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 59(2):589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. http://www.mathworks.fr/products/simulink/

  23. Marquis-Favre W (2007) Simulation des mécanismes: résolution des équations dans les logiciels. Techniques de l’ingénieur Modélisation mécanique

    Google Scholar 

  24. Uchida TK (2011) Real-time dynamic simulation of constrained multibody systems using symbolic computation. Systems design engineering, University of Waterloo, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang J, Gosselin C, Cheng L (2001) Modeling and simulation of robotic systems with closed kinematic chains using the virtual spring approach. Multibody Syst Dyn 7(2):145–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work received support from the Chair “Dynamics of complex mechanical systems—EADS Corporate Foundation—Arts et Métiers ParisTech and Ecole Centrale de Marseille”. Thanks to Paul B.T. Weustink working as Controllab Products for his help on the use of complementary tools of 20-sim software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Boudon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boudon, B., Malburet, F., Carmona, JC. (2014). Design Methodology of a Complex CKC Mechanical Joint with an Energetic Representation Tool “Multibond Graph”: Application to the Helicopter. In: Terze, Z. (eds) Multibody Dynamics. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07260-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07260-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07259-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07260-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics