Skip to main content

Providing a Method for Supporting the Decision Making About a Meaningful XBRL Implementation According to the Specific Situation of an Organization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Organizations and Smart Artifacts

Abstract

XBRL is in an increasing number of countries defined as the obligate format for the transmission of financial data to authorities by legal requirements. The legal requirement itself refers solely to the transmission of the information in XBRL format. How a formatting of a company’s report becomes realized is not regulated. This decision has to be done by the decision makers of the affected companies. There is no generally recommended realization or global valid implementation process. Each realization (bolt-on, built-in, and embedded) comprises a specific realization effort and offers different potential benefits for the implementing organization. Therefore, it is necessary to decide about the integration depth within an organization. The paper presents a methodology to support the decision process for the adoption of XBRL into the organization. By doing design science research, the constructed artifact enables a structured decision based on facts, individual properties, and needs of the organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sledgianowski, D., Fonfeder, R., Slavin, N.S.: Implementing XBRL reporting. CPA J. 80(8), 68–72 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vasarhelyi, M.A., Chan, D.Y., Krahel, J.P.: Consequences of XBRL standardization on financial statement data. J. Inf. Syst. 26(1), 155–167 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garbellotto, G.: XBRL implementation strategies: the bolt-on approach. Strateg. Finance 92, 56–58 (2009a)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garbellotto, G.: XBRL implementation strategies: the built-in approach. Strateg. Finance 92, 56–57 (2009b)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garbellotto, G.: XBRL Implementation Strategies: The Deeply-Embedded Approach, Strategic Finance, 92, 56–58 (2009c)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, E.E.: XBRL’s global ledger framework: exploring the standardised missing link to ERP integration. Int. J. Discl. Gov. 6(3), 188–206 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartley, J., Chen, A.Y.S., Taylor, E.Z.: A comparison of XBRL filings to corporate 10-ks-evidence from the voluntary filing program. Acc. Horiz. 25(2), 227–245 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Debreceny, R.S., Farewell, S.M., Piechocki, M., Felden, C., Gräning, A., d’Eri, A.: Flex or Break? Extensions in XBRL disclosures to the SEC. Acc. Horiz. 25(4), 631–657 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mertens, P.: Wirtschaftsinformatik: von den Moden zum Trends. In: König, W. (ed.) Wirtschaftsinformatik ‘95: Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, Innovation, Wirtschaftlichkeit, pp. 25–64. Physica, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M.M., ter Doest, H.W., Arbab, F., Bosma, H., Wieringa, R.J.: Enterprise architecture: management tool and blueprint for the organisation. Inf. Syst. Frontiers 8(2), 63–66 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. The Zachman Framework (2013). http://www.zachman.com/about-the-zachman-framework

  12. Blohm, H.: Die Gestaltung des betrieblichen Berichtswesens als Problem der Leitungsorganisation. Herne/Berlin, NWB (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bramsemann, R.: Handbuch Controlling, 3rd edn. München, Wien (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blohm, H.: Berichtssysteme. In: Grochla, E. (ed.) Handwörterbuch der Organisation, 2nd edn, pp. 315–320. Poeschel, Stuttgart (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horváth, P.: Controlling, 11th edn. München, Vahlen (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koch, R.: Betriebliches Berichtswesen als Informations- und Steuerungsinstrument. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weber, J., Schäffer, U.: Einführung in das Controlling, 11th edn. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. T-Rex-Terminosaurus Rex - Die Informationswissenschaft in Begriffen: Informationsaufbereitung (information work), http://server02.is.uni-sb.de/trex/index.php?id=1.3.1.4.&suche=N

  21. Bieg, H.: Buchführung, 2nd edn. NWB, Herne/Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. American Accounting Association: A Statement of Basic Accounting Theory. American Accounting Association, Sarasota (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  23. American Accounting Association: A Statement of Basic Accounting Theory. American Accounting Association, Sarasota (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Piechocki, M.: XBRL financial reporting chain architecture (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eisele, W.: Technik des betrieblichen Rechnungswesens – Buchführung und Bilanzierung, Kosten und Leistungsrechnung, Sonderbilanzen, Verlag Franz Vahlen, München (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Internet Source: IFRS. http://www.ifrs.com/ifrs_faqs.html#q1 (2010)

  27. International Accounting Standards n. 1 as issued at 1 January 2013

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steuerbürokratieabbaugesetz, http://www.authentidate.de/fileadmin/pdf/Grundlagen/GER_08_Steuerbuerokratieabbaugesetz_Jan2009.pdf (2008)

  29. Leibfried, P.: Finanzberichterstattung mittels XBRL - Mögliche Erleichterungen durch die Vermeidung von Datenbrüchen, in: Audit Committee News, no. 29, 10–13. http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/Publikationen/61865 (2010)

  30. XBRL Deutschland: Glossar, http://www.xbrl.de/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=79&Itemid=71 (2010)

  31. XBRL Deutschland: Einführung in XBRL, http://www.xbrl.de/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=80&Itemid=77

  32. Hoffman, C., Strand, C.: XBRL Essentials. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Internet Source: XBRL International (2013). www.XBRL.org. Last call 10/31/2013

  34. Beckert, T.: Prozesse in Produktion und Supply Chain optimieren. Springer Verlag, Wiesbaden (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Küpper, H.-U.: Controlling, 2nd edn. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Weber, J., Bramsemann, U., Heineke, C., Hirsch, B.: Wertorientierte Unternehmenssteuerung: Konzepte – Implementierung - Praxisstatements, 1. Auflage, Wiesbaden, Gabler (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Maria Franceschetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koschtial, C., Felden, C., Franceschetti, B.M. (2014). Providing a Method for Supporting the Decision Making About a Meaningful XBRL Implementation According to the Specific Situation of an Organization. In: Caporarello, L., Di Martino, B., Martinez, M. (eds) Smart Organizations and Smart Artifacts. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07040-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics