Skip to main content

In Search for Rules

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Popper and His Popular Critics

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Philosophy ((BRIEFSPHILOSOPH))

  • 1699 Accesses

Abstract

How is navigation possible between dogmatism and relativism? Traditionally, the chief aims of the rules were first to prevent error and second to reveal the truth. This is an excess. Fallibilism tries to rectify the situation. The central problem that Fallibilism raises is, what error is allowable, reasonable, or even fruitful? Philosophers of science deem science a success story and seek rules for total success. Feyerabend exposed this as a serious error, defending the freedom of speech that includes the freedom to assert foolish ideas. He offered this as a critique of the idea of rationality. It is but the view that rationality is not legally obligatory. It still is advisable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Agassi, Joseph. 2014. Proof, probability or plausibility. In: ed. Mulligan et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffa, Alberto. 1991. The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael. 1993. The logical basis of metaphysics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, Albert, and Leopold Infeld. 1938. The evolution of physics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.K. 1961. Knowledge without foundations: Two lectures delivered on the Nellie Heldt lecture fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.K. 1985. Problems of empiricism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.K. 1985. Philosophy of science versus scientific practice: Observations on mach, his followers and his opponents, in his problems of empiricism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.M. 1949. The man who shot liberty valance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, Kevin, Katarzyna Kijania-Placek and Tomasz Placek, eds. 2014. The history and philosophy of polish logic, essays in honour of Jan Wolenski.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. 1945. The open society and its enemies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1951. Two dogmas of empiricism, republished in Quine, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1953. From a logical point of view.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1994. Philosophical essays.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1948. Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Agassi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agassi, J. (2014). In Search for Rules. In: Popper and His Popular Critics. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06587-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics