Skip to main content

International Corporate Sustainability Barometer 2012: Sustainability Management in France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 31))

Abstract

This chapter summarises the results for France as part of the International Corporate Sustainability Barometer (ICSB). The introduction and the first section describe the context of sustainability in France and the characteristics of the French companies surveyed. The second section presents the main findings and some comparisons between our sample of French companies and the international average regarding the three main topics of the International Corporate Sustainability Barometer. Concerning the intention to manage sustainability issues, French firms are found to be most strongly influenced by national authorities. With regard to the integration of sustainability into the organisation, the results show that in France social and environmental issues affect the majority of organisational units to a lesser degree than is the case on international average. In addition, differences exist between organisational units in France. More specifically, sustainability-related and externally-oriented units, such as CSR and communication, are most supportive of sustainability. By contrast, performance-oriented units, such as finance and accounting, are less supportive. Lastly, the actual implementation of corporate sustainability is characterised by the fact that the application of sustainability management tools is less common among French companies when compared to the international average. Nevertheless, French companies frequently measure the impact of their sustainability measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    During a meeting with 18 directors of SD/CSR at large French companies, representatives were asked to describe ‘durable management’ and ‘responsible management’. Of the 18 directors, 6 stated there is a difference between the two terms, 8 understood the terms to be interchangeable, 3 preferred using only the term ‘responsible management’, and just 1 preferred using the term ‘durable management’.

  2. 2.

    The SBF (Société Française des Bourses) 120 is a French stock index made up of the most important and actively traded publicly listed French firms, continuously quoted in the Primary Market or the Second Market (unlisted securities market). This index is more diversified than the Paris stock index CAC 40.

  3. 3.

    This physical social network of sustainability and CSR managers was founded during the years 2000/2001 to develop informal exchanges between sustainability managers at French companies.

  4. 4.

    These associations are AFEP, French Association of Large Companies (http://www.afep.com) and MEDEF (Movement of the Enterprises of France), the largest union of employers in France.

  5. 5.

    These are the principal French reports and codes on corporate governance.

References

  • AccountAbility (1999) AA1000 framework. Standard, guidelines and professional qualification. The Institute of Social and Ethical AccountAbility, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett JE, Kotrlik JW, Higgins CC (2001) Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf Technol Learn Perform J 19(1):43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Boasson C, Wilson A (2002) Développement durable et performance globale des entreprises: premières analyses de stratégies et pratiques. Rapport Entreprise et Personnel/CSR Europe, Décembre 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourion C (2006) Corporate social responsibility in proximity management practice. Revue Internationale de Psychosociologie 28:77–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron M, Quairel-Lanoizelée F (2004) Mythes et réalités de l’entreprise responsable. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB, Näsi J (1997) Understanding stakeholder thinking: themes from a Finnish conference. Bus Ethics A Eur Rev 6(1):46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maggio P-J, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1999) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of the 21st century business. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendron C (2000) Enjeux sociaux et représentations de l’entreprise. Revue du Mauss 15:320–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray W-B (1987) The cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown. Am Econ Rev 77(5):998–1006

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bas C (2004) Management responsable et nécessaire régulation globale. Économie et Humanisme 370:58–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzki M, Schmidt F-L, Rynes S-L (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24(3):403–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez R (2003) On global responsibility in management. Corp Governance 3:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Kramer M (2006) The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J-C (1995) The impact of environmental and occupational health regulation on productivity growth in U.S. manufacturing. Yale J Regul 12:346–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Lüdeke-Freund F (2013) Business cases for sustainability. In: Idowu SO, Capaldi N, Zu L, Das Gupta A (eds) Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility. Springer, Berlin/New York, pp 245–252

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Harms D, Hörisch J, Windolph SE, Burritt R, Carter A, Truran S, Crutzen N, Ben Rhouma A, Csutora M, Tabi A, Kokubu K, Kitada H, Haider MB, Kim J-D, Lee K-H, Moneva JM, Ortas E, Álvarez-Etxeberria I, Daub C-H, Schmidt J, Herzig C, Morelli J (2013) International corporate sustainability barometer: a comparative study of 11 countries. Centre for Sustainability Management, Lüneburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Harms D, Windolph SE, Hörisch J (2014) Involving corporate functions: who contributes to sustainable development? Sustainability 6(5):3064–3085

    Google Scholar 

  • Starik M (1995) Should trees have managerial standing? Towards stakeholder status for nonhuman nature. J Bus Ethics 14(3):207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amel Ben Rhouma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ben Rhouma, A., Francoeur, C., Robin, G. (2014). International Corporate Sustainability Barometer 2012: Sustainability Management in France. In: Schaltegger, S., Windolph, S., Harms, D., Hörisch, J. (eds) Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics