Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can We Use S-BPM for Modeling Collaboration Scripts?

  • Conference paper
S-BPM ONE - Application Studies and Work in Progress (S-BPM ONE 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 422))

Abstract

S-BPM is a well-known approach for modeling business processes. Collaboration processes in form of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) scripts are apparently similar to business processes as they also define sequenced activities of subjects and interaction between them. Therefore, S-BPM is analyzed with regard to its suitability to model CSCL scripts, because a formal description of such learning processes is still missing. In order to address the requirements of those processes, a subject-oriented interpreter model is presented that facilitates the change of subjects’ behavior during the execution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fleischmann, A.: What Is S-BPM? In: Buchwald, H., Fleischmann, A., Seese, D., Stary, C. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2009. CCIS, vol. 85, pp. 85–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Stary, C., Obermeier, S., Börger, E.: Subject-Oriented Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Singer, R., Zinser, E.: Business Process Management — S-BPM a New Paradigm for Competitive Advantage? In: Buchwald, H., Fleischmann, A., Seese, D., Stary, C. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2009. CCIS, vol. 85, pp. 48–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinberger, A., Kollar, I., Dimitriadis, Y., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Fischer, F.: Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts. In: Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Barnes, S. (eds.) Technology-Enhanced Learning, pp. 155–173. Springer, Netherlands (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Harrer, A., Kobbe, L., Malzahn, N.: Conceptual and computational issues in the formalization of collaboration scripts. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL 2007, pp. 280–282. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miao, Y., Hoeksema, K., Hoppe, H.U., Harrer, A.: CSCL scripts: modelling features and potential use. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! CSCL 2005, pp. 423–432. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miao, Y., Harrer, A., Hoeksema, K., Hoppe, H.: Modeling CSCL Scripts — A Reflection on Learning Design Approaches. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., Haake, J.M. (eds.) Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol. 6, pp. 117–135. Springer, US (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Börger, E.: A Subject-Oriented Interpreter Model for S-BPM. Hanser Verlag (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Stary, C., Obermeier, S., Börger, E.: A Precise Description of the S-BPM Modeling Method. In: Subject-Oriented Business Process Management, pp. 227–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Pritchard, A., Woollard, J.: Psychology for the classroom. Constructivism and social learning. Psychology for the classroom series. Routledge, Milton Park (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., Hesse, F.: Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis. Educational Psychology Review 18, 159–185 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dillenbourg, P., Jermann, P.: Designing Integrative Scripts. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., Haake, J.M. (eds.) Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol. 6, pp. 275–301. Springer, US (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Dansereau, D.F., Collins, K.W., McDonald, B.A., Holly, C.: Development and evaluation of a learning strategy training program. Journal of Educational Psychology 71(1), 64–73 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jansen, M., Oelinger, M., Hoeksema, K., Hoppe, U.: An interactive maze scenario with physical robots and other smart devices. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, pp. 83–90 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., Fischer, F.: Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2, 211–224 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., Mandl, H.: Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion in computervermittelter Kommunikation. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology 211(2), 86–97 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2(4), 421–447 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F.: Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior 26(4), 506–515 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer, F., Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Kollar, I.: Online-Diskussionen in der Hochschullehre. Kooperationsskripts können das fachliche Argumentieren verbessern. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 57(3), 326–337 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dillenbourg, P.: Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design, pp. 61–91 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Börger, E., Stärk, R.F.: Abstract State Machines: A Method for High-Level System Design and Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P.: A Metamodel-based Language and a Simulation Engine for Abstract State Machines. Journal of Universal Computer Science 14(12), 1949–(1983)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P.: Ten Reasons to Metamodel ASMs. In: Abrial, J.-R., Glässer, U. (eds.) Rigorous Methods for Software Construction and Analysis. LNCS, vol. 5115, pp. 33–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Fleischmann, A., Kannengiesser, U., Schmidt, W., Stary, C.: Subject-Oriented Modeling and Execution of Multi-Agent Business Processes. In: International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT 2013. IEEE/WIC/ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Computer Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289, Darmstadt, Germany

    Kai Michael Höver & Max Mühlhäuser

Authors
  1. Kai Michael Höver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Max Mühlhäuser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Applied Sciences Ingolstadt, Esplanade 10, 85049, Ingolstadt, Germany

    Cornelia Zehbold

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Höver, K.M., Mühlhäuser, M. (2014). Can We Use S-BPM for Modeling Collaboration Scripts?. In: Zehbold, C. (eds) S-BPM ONE - Application Studies and Work in Progress. S-BPM ONE 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 422. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06191-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06191-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06190-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06191-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation