Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 475 Accesses

Abstract

Dynamic carrier lifetime techniques feature inherent advantages over steady-state techniques. Many of these advantages are related to the immediate access to time domain, which allows a straightforward interpretation without models and a priori assumptions. However, a decay time measurement is not necessarily a carrier lifetime measurement, and caution is required in cases of locally confined (nonuniform) excess carrier generation and recombination. This chapter details key constraints and limitations of dynamic, and particularly harmonically modulated, carrier lifetime techniques—elaborated in the course of this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For nonuniform excess carrier recombination and quasi-steady-state operation conditions, no distinction between harmonically modulated lifetime \(\tau _{eff,h}\) as derived from phase analyses and self-consistent lifetime \(\tau _{\sigma }\) is needed, as these expressions coincide here (cf. Sect. 5.2). Note that this does not hold for injection-dependent recombination properties (cf. Sect. 6.2).

  2. 2.

    The account given in this section is adapted from the corresponding original publication [2].

  3. 3.

    e.g. thick substrates with both, high surface recombination velocity and bulk lifetime, cf. Sect. 8.4

  4. 4.

    This is the case, if a rigorous quasi-steady-state condition is satisfied.

  5. 5.

    Note that \(||y_n ||^2\) has the dimension of a length, thereby rendering \(\beta _n\) dimensionless.

  6. 6.

    For non-negligible transmission through the substrate bulk, cumulative excess carrier density would be reduced by the same factor as cumulative generation rate. Also note that Eq. 6.8 neglects internal reflection of irradiation light, which is however irrelevant if \(\alpha _{\gamma }d\gg 1\).

  7. 7.

    The impact of the injection dependence of recombination properties on harmonically modulated lifetime measurements and other light-biased decay time measurements is thoroughly elaborated in Sect. 6.2.

  8. 8.

    The account given in this section is adapted from the corresponding original publications [6, 7].

  9. 9.

    Aberle et al. previously pointed out that their derivation for surface recombination velocities was transferrable to bulk recombination [9]. The same applies to effective lifetime, being representative of the sum of bulk and surface recombination rates— as already addressed by both Schuurmans et al. [10] and by Schmidt [11].

  10. 10.

    \(\tau _m\left( t\rightarrow 0\right) \) shall be denoted as \(\tau _m\) for reasons of simplicity.

  11. 11.

    For infinitesimal \(G_1\), Eq. 6.32 would be exact.

  12. 12.

    Note that the constant bias generation rate \(G_0\) does not give rise to the mismatch between \(\tau _m\) and \(\tau _{eff,0}\), here. It solely enables the use of the linearized Eq. 6.32 at a finite generation rate.

  13. 13.

    The exact algorithm of the determination of injection-dependent time shifts from harmonically modulated measurements is detailed in Sect. 8.1.2 and in [22].

References

  1. R.A. Sinton, T. Trupke, Limitations on dynamic excess carrier lifetime calibration methods. Prog. Photovoltaics: Res. Appl. 20, 246–249 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.A. Giesecke, W. Warta, Understanding carrier lifetime measurements at nonuniform recombination. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 082103 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J.A. Giesecke, R.A. Sinton, M.C. Schubert, S. Riepe, W. Warta, Determination of bulk lifetime and surface recombination velocity of silicon ingots from dynamic photoluminescence. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 3, 1311–1318 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A.B. Sproul, M.A. Green, A.W. Stephens, Accurate determination of minority carrier-and lattice scattering-mobility in silicon from photoconductance decay. J. Appl. Phys. 72, 4161–4171 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.A. Giesecke, F. Schindler, M. Bühler, M.C. Schubert, W. Warta, Accurate determination of minority carrier mobility in silicon from quasi-steady-state photoluminescence. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 213705 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.A. Giesecke, S.W. Glunz, W. Warta, Understanding and resolving the discrepancy between differential and actual minority carrier lifetime. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 073706 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J.A. Giesecke, S.W. Glunz, W. Warta, Determination of actual carrier lifetime from differential measurements. Energy Procedia 38, 59–65 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Brendel, Note on the interpretation of injection-level-dependent surface recombination velocities. Appl. Phys. A 60, 523–524 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A.G. Aberle, J. Schmidt, R. Brendel, On the data analysis of light-biased photoconductance decay measurements. J. Appl. Phys. 79, 1491–1496 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. F.M. Schuurmans, A. Schönecker, A.R. Burgers, W.C. Sinke, Simplified evaluation method for light-biased effective lifetime measurements. Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1795–1797 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Schmidt, Measurement of differential and actual recombination parameters on crystalline silicon wafers. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 46, 2018–2025 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. H.W. Curtis, R.L. Verkuil, A high signal-to-noise oscillator for contactless measurement of photoinduced carrier lifetimes, in Lifetime Factors in Silicon: A Symposium, ed. by R.D. Westbrook (Astm International, Philadelphia, 1980), pp. 210–224

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. D.E. Kane, R.M. Swanson, Measurement of the emitter saturation current by a contactless photoconductivity decay method, in Proceedings of the 18th IEEE PVSC (Las Vegas, 1988), pp. 578–583 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Klein, F. Wuensch, M. Kunst, The determination of charge-carrier lifetime in silicon. Phys. Stat. Sol B 245, 1865–1876 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. R.A. Sinton, A. Cuevas, Contactless determination of current-voltage characteristics and minority-carrier lifetimes in semiconductors from quasi-steady-state photoconductance data. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2510–2512 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Nagel, C. Berge, A.G. Aberle, Generalized analysis of quasi-steady-state and quasi-transient measurements of carrier lifetimes in semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 86, 6218–6221 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Sanii, F.P. Giles, R.J. Schwartz, J.L. Gray, Contactless nondestrcutive measurement of bulk and surface recombination using frequency-modulated free carrier absorption. Solid-State Electron. 35, 311–317 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S.W. Glunz, W. Warta, High-resolution lifetime mapping using modulated free-carrier absorption. J. Appl. Phys. 77, 3243–3247 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Brüggemann, S. Reynolds, Modulated photoluminescence studies for lifetime determination in amorphous-silicon passivated crystalline-silicon wafers. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352, 1888–1891 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.A. Giesecke, M.C. Schubert, D. Walter, W. Warta, Minority carrier lifetime in silicon wafers from quasi-steady-state photoluminescence. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 092109 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. J.A. Giesecke, D. Walter, F. Kopp, P. Rosenits, M. C. Schubert, W. Warta, Simultaneous determination of carrier lifetime and net dopant concentration of silicon wafers from photoluminescence, in Proceedings of the 35th IEEE PVSC (Honolulu, 2010), pp. 847–851

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.A. Giesecke, M.C. Schubert, W. Warta, Self-sufficient minority carrier lifetime in silicon from quasi-steady-state photoluminescence. Phys. Stat. Sol. A 209, 2286–2290 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. R.A. Sinton, A. Cuevas, M. Stuckings, Quasi-steady-state photoconductance, a new method for solar cell material and device characterization, in Proceedings of the 25th IEEE PVSC (Washington, D.C., 1996), pp. 457–460

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Mandelis, J. Batista, D. Shaughnessy, Infrared photocarrier radiometry of semiconductors: physical principles, quantitative depth profilometry, and scanning imaging of deep subsurface electronic defects. Phys. Rev. B 67, 205208 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Q. Sun, A. Melnikov, A. Mandelis, Quantitative self-calibrating lock-in carrierographic lifetime imaging of silicon wafers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 242107 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Trupke, R.A. Bardos, M.D. Abbott, Self-consistent calibration of photoluminescence and photoconductance lifetime measurements. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 184102 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Giesecke .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giesecke, J. (2014). Constraints of Dynamic Carrier Lifetime Techniques. In: Quantitative Recombination and Transport Properties in Silicon from Dynamic Luminescence. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06157-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics