Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 474 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter covers principles of harmonically modulated carrier lifetime techniques. Relative timescales of modulation are addressed, and different concepts of a quasi-steady-state condition are discussed. Beyond, self-consistency of the continuity equation is introduced as a powerful concept to obtain injection-dependent effective lifetime from harmonically modulated measurement designs. The self-consistent approach is classified and its essential characteristics are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here, the time \(t_{\downarrow }\) is chosen for evaluation of the continuity equation, but \(t_{\uparrow }\) could be chosen alike.

  2. 2.

    Notably, this is valid only for injection-independent effective lifetime.

  3. 3.

    Complications may generally arise in case of a combined occurence of a nonuniform depth profile of excess carrier density and a highly injection-dependent bulk lifetime. Any lifetime measurement technique would in that case yield a superposition of different lifetimes. Yet, this is a general constraint in lifetime metrology rather than a particular caution related to self-consistent or dynamic lifetime analyses.

  4. 4.

    Net dopant concentration does not necessarily affect any self-consistent lifetime analysis. Rather, it is specific to intermediate- to high-level injection luminescence analyses, as luminescence intensity is proportional to the product of minority and majority carrier density (cf. Eq. 5.8). For instance, a modulated photoconductance lifetime analysis would be independent of \(n_0\)—even under high-level injection conditions.

References

  1. R.A. Sinton, A. Cuevas, M. Stuckings, Quasi-steady-state photoconductance, a new method for solar cell material and device characterization, in Proceedings of the 25th IEEE PVSC, (Washington, D.C., 1996), pp. 457–460

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.A. Sinton, A. Cuevas, Contactless determination of current-voltage characteristics and minority-carrier lifetimes in semiconductors from quasi-steady-state photoconductance data. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2510–2512 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Nagel, C. Berge, A.G. Aberle, Generalized analysis of quasi-steady-state and quasi-transient measurements of carrier lifetimes in semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 86, 6218–6221 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P.P. Altermatt, F. Geelhaar, T. Trupke, X. Dai, A. Neisser, E. Daub, Injection dependence of spontaneous radiative recombination in crystalline silicon: experimental verification and theoretical analysis. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 261901 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Trupke, R.A. Bardos, M.D. Abbott, Self-consistent calibration of photoluminescence and photoconductance lifetime measurements. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 184102 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Trupke, R.A. Bardos, Self-consistent determination of the generation rate from photoconductance measurements. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3611–3613 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. W.S. Liang, K.J. Weber, Y.L. Ren, Impact of laterally non-uniform carrier lifetime on photoconductance-based lifetime measurements with self-consistent calibration. Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 21, 1640–1644 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. N.A. Tolstoi, P.P. Feofilov, Novel method to investigate the processes of rise and decay of luminescence (translation). Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 13, 211–217 (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.R. Engler, C.J. Kevane, Direct reading minority carrier lifetime measuring apparatus. Rev. Sci. Instr. 28, 548–551 (1957)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Harnik, A. Many, N.B. Grover, Phase shift method of carrier lifetime measurements in semiconductors. Rev. Sci. Instr. 29, 889–891 (1958)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Bowden, R.A. Sinton, Determining lifetime in silicon blocks and wafers with accurate expressions for carrier density. J. Appl. Phys. 102, 124501 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. J.A. Giesecke, M.C. Schubert, W. Warta, Measurement of net dopant concentration via dynamic photoluminescence. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 063704 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J.A. Giesecke, M.C. Schubert, D. Walter, W. Warta, Minority carrier lifetime in silicon wafers from quasi-steady-state photoluminescence. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 092109 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. J.A. Giesecke, M.C. Schubert, W. Warta, Self-sufficient minority carrier lifetime in silicon from quasi-steady-state photoluminescence. Phys. Stat. Sol. A 209, 2286–2290 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.A. Giesecke, S.W. Glunz, W. Warta, Understanding and resolving the discrepancy between differential and actual minority carrier lifetime. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 073706 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Giesecke .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giesecke, J. (2014). Harmonically Modulated Lifetime. In: Quantitative Recombination and Transport Properties in Silicon from Dynamic Luminescence. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06157-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics