Skip to main content

Macro-benthos Diversity in a Headwater Stream Affected by Tea and Paddy Agricultural Runoff, Sri Lanka

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Water, Energy and Bio-resources in the Era of Climate Change: Emerging Issues and Challenges

Abstract

It is well documented that soil, organic matter, fertilizer and pesticides from agricultural lands are transported into adjacent streams with surface runoff changing the quality of those water ways (Neuman and Dudgeon, 2002). The eroded soil particles transported over the agricultural lands include nutrients, pesticides and their residuals. Therefore, soil erosion can cause both physical and chemical impacts in adjacent aquatic systems (Merrigton et al. 2002). Even a thin film of fine sediments in aquatic systems can eliminate or reduce the sensitive taxa population of macro invertebrates, such as Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera (Evans, 1996; Leeks, 1995). However, pesticides transportation is one of the severe impacts on aquatic ecosystem compared to other chemicals such as artificial fertilizers (Liess and Schulz, 1999; Merrigton et al. 2002) altering the dynamics of macro-benthos communities in streams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Public Health Association (1985). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 60th ed, Washington, DC 20005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, J. and Ballance, R. (1996). Water Quality Monitoring: A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Freshwater Quality Studies and Monitoring Programmes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, K.J., Abby, M., James, B.S., Kerry, L., Neal, D. and Ellen, F. (2003). Family level key to the stream invertebrates of Maryland and surrounding areas. 3rd ed. 580 Taylor Avenue, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, J. (1998). Which species, What kind of diversity, Which ecosystem function: Some problems in studies of in relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Applied Soil Ecology, 10: 191-199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilby, R.E. and Likens, G.E. (1980). Importance of organic debris dams in the structure and function of stream ecosystems. Ecology, 61: 1107-1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, R.W. (2004). Guide to aquatic macro invertebrates of the upper Midwest. St. Paul, MN. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brey, T. (1990). Estimating productivity of macrobenthic invertebrates from biomass and mean individual weight. Meeresforsch, 32: 329-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A., Nally, M.R., Bond, N. and Lake, S.P. (2008). Macroinvertebrate diversity in head water streams: A review. Freshwater Biology, 53: 1707-1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dara, H.W. and Duoglas, G.C. (1998). Estimating secondary production and benthic consumption in monitoring studies: A case study of the impacts of dredged material disposal in Galveston bay, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. (1996). Soil erosion and its impacts in England and Wales. Friends of the earth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, C.H. and Weerawardhana, S.R. (2002). Sri Lanka freshwater fauna and fisheries. Kitchener, Ontario, Canada N2B 2B9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, A. (2006). Regional capacity building workshop on the macroinvertebrate taxonomy and systematic for evaluating the ecological status of rivers in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan (HKH) region. University of natural resources and applied life science, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeks, G.J.L. (1995). Effect of agricultural soil erosion on water courses. National Rivers Authority. R & D Note 409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liess, M. and Schulz, R. (1999). Linking insecticide contamination and population response in an agricultural stream. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18(9): 1948-1955.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L.B., Wolman, M.G. and Miller, J.P. (1964). Fluvial processes in geomorphology. W.H. Freeman and company, Sanfrancisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandawille, S.M. (2002). Benthic macroinvertebrates in freshwaters-taxa tolerance values, metrics, and protocols. Soil and water conservation society of metro Halfax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrigton, G., Winder, L. and Redman, M. (2002). Agricultural pollution. Spon press, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Munari, C. and Mistri, M. (2007). Structure and secondary production of the macrobenthic community in an aquatic transition environment of the gulf of Olbia Mediterranean sea. Marine Science, 36(3): 216-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, N. and Dudgeon, D. (2002). The impact of agricultural runoff on stream benthos in Hong Kong China. Water Research, 36: 3103-3109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescador, M.L., Rasmussen, A.K. and Harris, S.C. (1995). Identification manual for the caddisfly (Tricoptera) Larvae of Florida. Clarion University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y.M., Leprieur, F., Thomas, A., Lek-ang, S., Chon, T. and Lek, S. (2009). Impact of agricultural land use on aquatic insect assemblages in the Garonn river catchment (SW France). Aquatic Ecology, 43: 999-1009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R.C., Arambam, R. and Sharma, R. (2009). Surveying macro invertebrate diversity in the Tons river, Doon valley, India. Environmentalist, 29: 241-254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thani, I. and Phalaraksh, C. (2008). A preliminary study of aquatic insect diversity and water quality of Mekong river, Thailand. KKU Science Journal, 36: 95-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumbolo, M.L. and Downing, J.A. (1994). An empirical model for the prediction of secondary production in marine benthic invertebrate populations. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 114: 165-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xinzheng, L., Jinbao, W., Hongfa, W. and Baolin, Z. (2005). Secondary production of macro benthos from the East China Sea. Applied Environmental Biology, 11(4): 459-462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J.B., Eggert, S.L., Meyer, J.L. and Webster, J.L. (1997). Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science, 277: 102-104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, D.H. and Clarke, D.G. (1998). Estimating secondary production and benthic consumption in monitoring studies: A case study of the impacts of dredged material disposal in Galveston bay texas. Estuaries, 21(2): 230-245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. L. K. Sanjaya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Capital Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanjaya, H.L.K., Asanthi, H.B., Jayasinghe, U.A.D. (2015). Macro-benthos Diversity in a Headwater Stream Affected by Tea and Paddy Agricultural Runoff, Sri Lanka. In: Raju, N., Gossel, W., Ramanathan, A., Sudhakar, M. (eds) Management of Water, Energy and Bio-resources in the Era of Climate Change: Emerging Issues and Challenges. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05969-3_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics