Abstract
The main questions I address are as follows: What were the sources of the ethical concepts that became enshrined in the Nuremberg Code? What immediate or short-term impact did the Trial and the Code have on human subjects research ethics in the USA? Finally, could we envision a set of circumstances in which the Trial might never have occurred? To address the latter question, I will suggest comparisons between the US response to medical war crimes in postwar Germany and Japan. While medical war crimes in Germany were not restricted to unethical experiments on human subjects, I will focus here on that aspect of Nazi medicine, as that discussion is most directly relevant to my list of questions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. 1995. Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Annas, G.J., and M.A. Grodin (eds.). 1992. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beecher, H.K. 1966. Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine 274: 1354–1360.
Brody, H., S.E. Leonard, J.B. Nie, and P. Weindling. 2014. U.S. responses to Japanese wartime inhuman experimentation after World War II: National security and wartime exigency. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23(2): 220–30.
Fell, N. 1947a, April 22. Report by Norbert H. Fell. Interrogation of Masuda, Tomosada. In Unit 731 and biological warfare: a CD-ROM collection, S. Kondo, ed., Disc 2, pp. 1–2 (2003). Toyko: Kashiwa Shobo.
———. 1947b, June 24. Addendum to report by Norbert H. Fell In Unit 731 and biological warfare: a CD-ROM collection, S. Kondo, ed., Disc 2, p. 2 (2003). Toyko: Kashiwa Shobo.
Harris, S.H. 2002. Factories of death: Japanese biological warfare, 1932–1945, and the American cover-up. New York: Routledge.
Heller, J. 1972/2000. Syphilis victims in U.S. study went untreated for 40 years. Associated Press, July 26, 1972. In Tuskegee’s truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, ed. S.M. Reverby, 116–118. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press (Reprinted in 2000).
Hill, V. & Victor, J. 1947, December 12. Report by Edwin V. Hill and Joseph Victor. Introduction. In Unit 731 and biological warfare: A CD-ROM collection, ed. S. Kondo, Disc 2, p. 4 (2003). Toyko: Kashiwa Shobo.
Kevles, D.J. 1985. In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lifton, R.J. 2000. The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York: Basic Books.
Marrus, M.R. 1999. The Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial in historical context. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 73: 106–123.
Miller, F.G., and H. Brody. 2003. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. The Hastings Center Report 33(3): 19–28.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html. Accessed 29 May 2013.
Nie, J.B. 2006. The United States cover-up of Japanese wartime medical atrocities: Complicity committed in the national interest and two proposals for contemporary action. American Journal of Bioethics 6(3): W21–W33.
Nie, J.B., N. Guo, M. Selden, and A. Kleinman (eds.). 2010. Japan’s wartime medical atrocities: Comparative inquiries in science, history, and ethics. New York: Routledge.
Proctor, R.N. 1988. Racial hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rothman, D. 1991. Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. New York: Basic Books.
Shuster, E. 1997. Fifty years later: The significance of the Nuremberg Code. New England Journal of Medicine 337: 1436–1440.
———. 1998. The Nuremberg Code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights. Lancet 351: 974–977.
State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee (SWNCC). 1947a, August 1. Interrogation of certain Japanese by Russian prosecutor. In Unit 731 and biological warfare: a CD-ROM collection, ed. S. Kondo, Disc 3, Appendix A, p. 4 (2003). Toyko: Kashiwa Shobo.
———. 1947b, August 1. Interrogation of certain Japanese by Russian prosecutor. In Unit 731 and biological warfare: a CD-ROM collection, ed. S. Kondo Disc 3, p. 1 (2003). Toyko: Kashiwa Shobo.
Vollman, J., and R. Winau. 1996. Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg Code. British Medical Journal 313: 1445–1449.
Weindling, P.J. 2010. John W. Thompson: Psychiatrist in the shadow of the Holocaust. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
———. 2012. Die Opfer von Menschenversuchen und gewaltsamer Forschung im Nationalsozialismus mit Fokus auf Geschlecht und Rasse. Ergebnisse eines Forschungsprojekts. In Geschlecht und Rasse in der NS-Medizin, eds. I. Eschebach, and A. Ley, pp. 81–100. Berlin: Metropol
Williams, P., and D. Wallace. 1989. Unit 731: Japan’s secret biological warfare in World War II. New York: Free Press.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Sarah Leonard for research assistance on the Japanese experiments and to Paul Weindling and Jing-Bao Nie for scholarly advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brody, H. (2014). The Origins and Impact of the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial. In: Rubenfeld, S., Benedict, S. (eds) Human Subjects Research after the Holocaust. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05702-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05702-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05701-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05702-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)