Abstract
Steelmaking is an energy intensive industrial sector and being largely coal-based it gives rise to 5–6 % of the global CO2 emissions. Energy use for producing 1 ton of crude steel has been reduced by 50 % since 1975, but the annual production rate of crude steel has been increasing more strongly. Since 2002, the production rate has increased by almost 80 % amounting to 1,510 Mt in 2012, and this trend seems to continue in the future. Therefore, making the iron production itself more efficient is not enough to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. A possible remedy is to replace part of the fossil reductants by renewables and to optimize the entire production chain from ores to steel, allowing more beneficial resource allocation in the processes involved. The present study focuses on the use of biomass as auxiliary reductant in the blast furnace, also paying attention to the effect of the introduction on the material and energy flows of the whole steel plant using a simulation model. Substituting part of the fossil coke or injected hydrocarbon by biomass may result in reduced fossil carbon dioxide emissions, as long as the biomass is harvested, transported and pre-processed in a sustainable way. As the biomass may need upgrading before it is used, a torrefaction model is included in the steel plant model. Results are presented from studies where the entire system is optimized with respect to costs, considering a penalty for CO2 emissions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A. Ohliger, M. Förster, R. Kneer, Fuel 104, 607–613 (2012)
W.-H. Chen, H.-C. Hsu, K.-M. Lu, W.-J. Lee, T.-C. Lin, Energy 36, 3012–3021 (2011)
H. Helle, M. Helle, F. Pettersson, H. Saxén, ISIJ Int. 49, 1316–1324 (2009)
C.-M. Wiklund, F. Pettersson, H. Saxén, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 44(2), 447–458 (2013)
H. Helle, M. Helle, H. Saxén, Chem. Eng. Sci. 66, 6470–6481 (2011)
C.-M. Wiklund, F. Pettersson, H. Saxén, ISIJ Int. 52, 35–44 (2012)
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/university/academic/pub/page/ban_ilog_programming 18.09.2013
M. Phanphanich, S. Mani, Bioresour. Technol. 102, 1246–1253 (2011)
J. Meng, J. Park, D. Tilotta, S. Park, Bioresour. Technol. 111, 439–446 (2012)
W.-H. Chen, S.-W. Du, C.-H. Tsai, Z.-Y. Wang, Bioresour. Technol. 111, 433–438 (2012)
J. Ranta, M. Sc. Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology (1994)
M.J.C. van der Stelt, H. Gerhauser, J.H.A. Kiel, K.J. Ptasinski, Biomass Bioenergy 35, 3748–3762 (2011)
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to Frank Pettersson and Anders Skjäl for their assistance with the mathematical model. Additionally, I would like to thank Oskar Karlström for good discussions concerning the torrefaction of biomass. Support from the Academy of Finland in the Symbiosis research project is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wiklund, CM., Saxén, H., Helle, M. (2014). Optimal Resource Allocation in Steel Making Using Torrefied Biomass as Auxiliary Reductant. In: Oral, A., Bahsi, Z., Ozer, M. (eds) International Congress on Energy Efficiency and Energy Related Materials (ENEFM2013). Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 155. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05521-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05521-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05520-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05521-3
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)