Skip to main content

Why do We Need to Distribute Creativity?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Distributed Creativity

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSPSYCHOL))

  • 1908 Accesses

Abstract

The last chapter opens with a summary of key arguments regarding distribution and creativity and emphasises the idea that creative acts are simultaneously socially, materially and temporally distributed. Several theoretical and practical consequences of adopting a view of creativity as a distributed process are presented. These concern the definition of creativity, current dichotomies between celebrated and mundane creations, the role of individuals in creative work, new methodological perspectives, the issue of creative agency and responsibility towards the creativity of self and others. In the end it is argued that a cultural psychological framework of distributed creativity is much better positioned to capture the intricacies of creating as members of human society and culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baldwin, J. M. (1911). The individual and society or psychology and sociology. Boston, MA: Richard G. Badger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1923). Psychology and primitive culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M. C. (1999). Ordinary creativity. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. I, pp. 153–171). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429. doi:10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430

  • Becker, H. S. (2008). Art worlds. Updated and expended. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. (1994). What is creativity? In M. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 75–117). London: MIT Press/Badford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F. (1874/1911). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1962). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A. (2006). Towards produsage: Futures for user-led content production. In F. Sudweeks, H. Hrachovec, & C. Ess (Eds.), Proceedings cultural attitudes towards communication and technology (pp. 275–284). Estonia: Tartu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. doi:10.1111/1467-8284.00096

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Ambrose, D. (1999). Adaptation and creativity. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 9–22). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diriwächter, R., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2008). Striving for the whole: Creating theoretical syntheses. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63, 482–512. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.014

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, G. P. (1980). Epilogue: A conception of situated action. In M. Brenner (Ed.), The structure of action (pp. 313–350). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Principles for a cultural psychology of creativity. Culture & Psychology, 16(2), 147–163. doi:10.1177/1354067X10361394

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2011a). Creating creativity: Reflections from fieldwork. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45(1), 100–115. doi:10.1007/s12124-010-9147-2

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2011b). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00445.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2011c). How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers. Theory & Psychology, 21(4), 473–492. doi:10.1177/0959354310372152

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). Creativity and culture: Towards a cultural psychology of creativity in folk art. PhD thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2013a). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81. doi:10.1037/a0029528

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2013b). Creativity and folk art: A study of creative action in traditional craft. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(2), 140–154. doi:10.1037/a0029318

  • Glăveanu, V. P., & Gillespie, A. (2014). Creativity out of difference: Theorising semiotic, social and temporal gaps. In V. P. Glăveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from cultural psychology (forthcoming). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P., & Lahlou, S. (2012). ‘Through the creator’s eyes’: Using the subjective camera to study craft creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 152–162. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.677293

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. doi:10.1037/h0063487

  • Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2006). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A. (2003). Is the social psychology of creativity really social? Moving beyond a focus on the individual. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 181–201). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.1037/a0013688

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liep, J. (2001). Introduction. In J. Liep (Ed.), Locating cultural creativity (pp. 1–13). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magyari-Beck, I. (1999). Creatology. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 433–441). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 449–460). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1995). Deconstructing the lone genius myth: Toward a contextual view of creativity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 35(3), 69–112. doi:10.1177/00221678950353005

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1997). Social creativity: The challenge of complexity. Translation of Le dimensioni sociali della creatività. Pluriverso, 1(2), 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In R. K. Sawyer, et al. (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 61–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (1999). Creativity need not be social. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. I, pp. 237–264). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (1995). Creativity as mediated action: A comparison of improvisational performance and product creativity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(3), 172–191. doi:10.1080/10749039509524698

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Emergence in creativity and development. In R. K. Sawyer, et al. (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 12–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81–92. doi:10.1037/a0013282

  • Simonton, D. K. (2003). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 304–325). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tanggaard, L. (2013). The sociomateriality of creativity in everyday life. Culture & Psychology, 19(1), 20–32. doi:10.1177/1354067X12464987

  • Tanggaard, L. (2014). Fooling around: Pathways to creative learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development: An introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, vol. IV (pp. 1–251). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of the genius. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (1997). A person–process–context–time approach to understanding intellectual development. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 288–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, K. (2012). Reformation and the distrust of the projector in the Hartlib Circle. Historical Journal, 55, 375–397. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X12000064

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24–37. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.545713

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vlad Petre Glăveanu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glăveanu, V.P. (2014). Why do We Need to Distribute Creativity?. In: Distributed Creativity. SpringerBriefs in Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05434-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics