Skip to main content

Optimizing Computation of Repairs from Active Integrity Constraints

  • Conference paper
Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8367))

Abstract

Active integrity constraints (AICs) are a form of integrity constraints for databases that not only identify inconsistencies, but also suggest how these can be overcome. The semantics for AICs defines different types of repairs, but deciding whether an inconsistent database can be repaired is a NP- or \(\Sigma^2_p\)-complete problem, depending on the type of repairs one has in mind. In this paper, we introduce two different relations on AICs: an equivalence relation of independence, allowing the search to be parallelized among the equivalence classes, and a precedence relation, inducing a stratification that allows repairs to be built progressively. Although these relations have no impact on the worst-case scenario, they can make significant difference in the practical computation of repairs for inconsistent databases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abiteboul, S.: Updates, a new frontier. In: Gyssens, M., Paredaens, J., Van Gucht, D. (eds.) ICDT 1988. LNCS, vol. 326, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beeri, C., Vardi, M.Y.: The implication problem for data dependencies. In: Even, S., Kariv, O. (eds.) ICALP 1981. LNCS, vol. 115, pp. 73–85. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Caroprese, L., Greco, S., Sirangelo, C., Zumpano, E.: Declarative semantics of production rules for integrity maintenance. In: Etalle, S., Truszczyński, M. (eds.) ICLP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4079, pp. 26–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Caroprese, L., Truszczyński, M.: Active integrity constraints and revision programming. Theory Pract. Log. Program. 11(6), 905–952 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chomicki, J.: Consistent query answering: Five easy pieces. In: Schwentick, T., Suciu, D. (eds.) ICDT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4353, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cruz-Filipe, L., Engrácia, P., Gaspar, G., Nunes, I.: Computing repairs from active integrity constraints. In: Wang, H., Banach, R. (eds.) TASE 2013, pp. 183–190. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eiter, T., Gottlob, G.: On the complexity of propositional knowledge base revision, updates, and counterfactuals. Artif. Intell. 57(2-3), 227–270 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Flesca, S., Greco, S., Zumpano, E.: Active integrity constraints. In: Moggi, E., Scott Warren, D. (eds.) PPDP, pp. 98–107. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P.: Database updates through abduction. In: McLeod, D., Sacks-Davis, R., Schek, H.-J. (eds.) VLDB 1990, pp. 650–661. Morgan Kaufmann (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.O.: On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it. In: Allen, J.F., Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) KR 1991, pp. 387–394. Morgan Kaufmann (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marek, V.W., Truszczynski, M.: Revision programming, database updates and integrity constraints. In: Gottlob, G., Vardi, M.Y. (eds.) ICDT 1995. LNCS, vol. 893, pp. 368–382. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayol, E., Teniente, E.: Addressing efficiency issues during the process of integrity maintenance. In: Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Soda, G., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) DEXA 1999. LNCS, vol. 1677, pp. 270–281. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Naqvi, S.A., Krishnamurthy, R.: Database updates in logic programming. In: Edmondson-Yurkanan, C., Yannakakis, M. (eds.) PODS 1988, pp. 251–262. ACM (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Przymusinski, T.C., Turner, H.: Update by means of inference rules. J. Log. Program. 30(2), 125–143 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Teniente, E., Olivé, A.: Updating knowledge bases while maintaining their consistency. VLDB J. 4(2), 193–241 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Widom, J., Ceri, S. (eds.): Active Database Systems: Triggers and Rules For Advanced Database Processing. Morgan Kaufmann (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Winslett, M.: Updating Logical Databases. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cruz-Filipe, L. (2014). Optimizing Computation of Repairs from Active Integrity Constraints. In: Beierle, C., Meghini, C. (eds) Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. FoIKS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8367. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04939-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04939-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04938-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04939-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics