Skip to main content

Tissue Viability and Skin Tearing in Mammography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Mammography
  • 3188 Accesses

Abstract

It has been acknowledged that some women are more sensitive to the handling and pressure exerted on their breasts during a mammogram than others [1]. This sensitivity can include heightened feelings of pain, skin reddening, tingling and bruising [2]; these are considered to be acceptable risks. A small proportion of women after mammography however, can go on to experience breast pain for days. Also they may develop pressure ulcers or skin tears. These pressure ulcers or skin tears are very rarely reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. NHS Breast Screening Programme. Information and advice for health professionals in breast screening. Sheffield: NHS Cancer Screening Programme; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cancerbackup. NHS breast screening: helping you decide. 2011. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/publications/nhsbsp.pdf.

  3. Department of Health. NHS 2010–2015: from good to great. Preventative, people-centred, productive. London: DH; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. NHS Quality Observatory. NHS safety thermometer. 2013. http://www.safetythermometer.nhs.uk/.

  5. Dustler M, Andersson I, Brorson H, Fröjd P, Mattsson S, Tingberg A, Zackrisson S, Förnvik D. Breast compression in mammography: pressure distribution patterns. Acta Radiol. 2012;53(9):973–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Friction induced skin injuries – are they pressure ulcers? A National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel White Paper. 2012. https://www.npuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/NPUAP-Friction-White-Paper.pdf.

  7. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Shear Force Initiative Presentation. 2012b. http://www.npuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Shear_slides.pdf.

  8. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory panel. NPUAP Pressure Ulcer Stages/Categories. 2009. http://www.npuap.org/resources/educational-and-clinical-resources/npuap-pressure-ulcer-stagescategories/.

  9. LeBlanc K, Baranoski S. Skin tears: state of the science: consensus statements for the prevention, prediction, assessment, and treatment of skin tears. 2011. http://www.skintears.org/pdf/SkinTearsConsensusStatements.pdf.

  10. Fletcher J. Device related pressure ulcers made easy. 2012. http://www.woundsinternational.com/pdf/content_10472.pdf.

  11. Voegeli D. Factors that exacerbate skin breakdown and ulceration, Skin breakdown, the silent epidemic. Hull: Smith and Nephew Foundation; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baranoski S, Ayello EA. Wound care essentials, practice principles. Springhouse: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mistiaen P, van Halm-Walters M. Prevention and treatment of intertrigo in large skin folds of adults: a systematic review. BMC Nurs. 2010;9(12):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stephen-Haynes J, Carville K. Skin tears made easy. Wounds Int. 2011;2(4):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wingfield C. Managing dry skin conditions. Wound Essent. 2011;6:50–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. British National Formulary. British National Formulary online. 2014. http://www.bnf.org/bnf/index.htm. Retrieved from 04 Apr 2014.

  17. Johnston E. The role of nutrition in Tissue Viability. 2007. http://www.woundsinternational.com/pdf/content_182.pdf.

  18. Payne RL, Martin ML. Defining and classifying skin tears: need for a common language. Ostomy Wound Manag. 1993;39(5):16–20, 2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Carville K, Lewin G, Newall N, Haslehurst P, Michael R, Santamaria N, Roberts P. STAR: a consensus for skin tear classification. Prim Intention. 2007;15(1):18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  20. White W. Skin tears: a descriptive study of the opinions, clinical practice and knowledge base of RNs caring for the aged in high care residential facilities. Prim Intention. 2001;9(4):138–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie Stephens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stephens, M. (2015). Tissue Viability and Skin Tearing in Mammography. In: Hogg, P., Kelly, J., Mercer, C. (eds) Digital Mammography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04831-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04831-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04830-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04831-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics