Skip to main content
  • 1756 Accesses

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) coupled with time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful tool for the analysis of biological samples, and nanoflow high-performance liquid chromatography (nanoHPLC) is a useful separation technique for the analysis of complex proteomics samples. The off-line combination of MALDI and nanoHPLC has been extensively investigated and straightforward techniques have been developed, focussing particularly on automated MALDI sample preparation that yields sensitive and reproducible spectra. Normally conventional solid MALDI matrices such as α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) are used for sample preparation. However, they have limited usefulness in quantitative measurements and automated data acquisition because of the formation of heterogeneous crystals, resulting in highly variable ion yields and desorption/ionization characteristics. Glycerol-based liquid support matrices (LSM) have been proposed as an alternative to the traditional solid matrices as they provide increased shot-to-shot reproducibility, leading to prolonged and stable ion signals and therefore better results. This chapter focuses on the integration of LSM MALDI matrices into the LC-MALDI MS/MS approach in identifying complex and large proteomes. The interface between LC and MALDI consists of a robotic spotter, which fractionates the eluent from the LC column into nanoliter volumes, and co-spots simultaneously the liquid matrix with the eluent fractions onto a MALDI target plate via sheath-flow. The efficiency of this method is demonstrated through the analysis of trypsin digests of both bovine serum albumin (BSA) and Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Please note that the liquid matrices in this chapter are glycerol-based liquid support matrices (LSMs) as described here and not ionic liquid matrices (ILMs), which lack the addition of glycerol. See also the Chapters ‘Ionic Liquids and Other Liquid Matrices for Sensitive MALDI MS Analysis’ and ‘Quantitative MALDI-MS Using Ionic Liquid Matrices’ in this book for more information on ionic liquid matrices.

  2. 2.

    See also the discussion/introduction to multiply charged MALDI ions in the Chapter ‘Efficient Production of Multiply Charged MALDI Ions’ in this book.

  3. 3.

    The length of the fused-silica tubing between the UV flow cell and the automated spotter should be kept as short as possible to minimize band spreading of the eluted sample. The internal diameter of the fused-silica tubing should be 20 μm for nanoHPLC and 50 μm for capillary HPLC.

  4. 4.

    For highly complex samples, the fractionation time interval should be no more than 10–15 s but can be increased up to 30 s to obtain higher sensitivity.

  5. 5.

    Where continuous flow is selected the matrix flow rate should be set higher than normally required because of the viscosity of the liquid matrix. For discontinuous flow, the volume should be higher than normally required for the same reason.

  6. 6.

    Note that other MALDI-MS instruments and thus target plates can be used with the appropriate adaptations/teaching.

  7. 7.

    The fused-silica capillary should protrude no more than 0.1 mm from the needle probe.

  8. 8.

    LIFT calibration is not straightforward and is best left to an experienced service engineer.

  9. 9.

    In our lab we use the following software versions for this step: 3.0 (flexAnalysis), 1.1 (WARP-LC), 3.1 (BioTools).

References

  • Beranova-Giorgianni S (2003) Proteome analysis by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry: strengths and limitations. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 22(5):273–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bodnar WM, Blackburn R, Krise J, Moseley MA (2003) Exploiting the complementary nature of LC/MALDI/MS/MS and LC/ESI/MS/MS for increased proteome coverage. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14(9):971–979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer R, Dreisewerd K (2007) UV matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization: principles, instrumentation, and applications. In: Gross ML, Caprioli RM (eds) The encyclopedia of mass spectrometry, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 646–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattan SJ, Marchese J, Khainovski N, Martin S, Juhasz P (2005) Comparative study of [Three] LC-MALDI workflows for the analysis of complex proteomic samples. J Proteome Res 4(6):1931–1941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hioki Y, Tanimura R, Iwamoto S, Tanaka K (2014) Nano-LC/MALDI-MS using a column-integrated spotting probe for analysis of complex biomolecule samples. Anal Chem 86(5):2549–2558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karas M, Hillenkamp F (1988) Laser desorption ionization of proteins with molecular masses exceeding 10,000 daltons. Anal Chem 60(20):2299–2301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolli VSK, Orlando R (1996) A new matrix for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization on magnetic sector instruments with point detectors. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 10(8):923–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li YL, Gross ML (2004) Ionic-liquid matrices for quantitative analysis by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 15(12):1833–1837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maccarrone G, Turck C, Martins-de-Souza D (2010) Shotgun mass spectrometry workflow combining IEF and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF. Protein J 29(2):99–102

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melchior K, Tholey A, Heisel S, Keller A, Lenhof H, Meese E, Huber CG (2010) Protein- versus peptide fractionation in the first dimension of two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography-matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem mass spectrometry for qualitative proteome analysis of tissue samples. J Chromatogr A 1217(40):6159–6168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirgorodskaya E, Braeuer C, Fucini P, Lehrach H, Gobom J (2005) Nanoflow liquid chromatography coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry: sample preparation, data analysis, and application to the analysis of complex peptide mixtures. Proteomics 5(2):399–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagra DS, Li L (1995) Liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry with continuous-flow matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization. J Chromatogr A 711(2):235–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmblad M, Cramer R (2007) Liquid matrix deposition on conductive hydrophobic surfaces for tuning and quantitation in UV-MALDI mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 18(4):693–697. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2006.11.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira F, Niu X, deMello AJ (2013) A nano LC-MALDI mass spectrometry droplet interface for the analysis of complex protein samples. PLoS One 8(5):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Riffault M, Moulin D, Grossin L, Mainard D, Magdalou J, Vincourt J (2015) Label-free relative quantification applied to LC-MALDI acquisition for rapid analysis of chondrocyte secretion modulation. J Proteomics 114:263–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szajli E, Feher T, Medzihradszky KF (2008) Investigating the quantitative nature of MALDI-TOF MS. Mol Cell Proteomics 7(12):2410–2418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sze ETP, Chan TWD, Wang G (1998) Formulation of matrix solutions for use in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization of biomolecules. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 9(2):166–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Towers M, Cramer R (2007) Liquid matrices for analyses by UV-MALDI mass spectrometry. Spectroscopy 22:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauger SA, Webb W, Siuzdak G (2002) Peptide and protein analysis with mass spectrometry. Spectroscopy 16(1):15–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner Y, Sickmann A, Meyer HE, Daum G (2003) Multidimensional nano-HPLC for analysis of protein complexes. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14(9):1003–1011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Zhang S, Howe K, Wilson DB, Moser F, Irwin D, Thannhauser TW (2007) A comparison of nLC-ESI-MS/MS and nLC-MALDI-MS/MS for geLC-based protein identification and iTRAQ-based shotgun quantitative proteomics. J Biomol Tech 18(4):226–237

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Cramer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wiangnon, K., Cramer, R. (2016). Coupling Liquid MALDI MS to Liquid Chromatography. In: Cramer, R. (eds) Advances in MALDI and Laser-Induced Soft Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04819-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics