Abstract
In this paper, an exergoeconomic analysis of a cascade active magnetic regenerative (AMR) refrigeration system operating on a regenerative Brayton cycle is conducted with respect to various system design parameters. The finite difference method is used in order to solve the set of governing equations, which are highly nonlinear and coupled. In exergy analysis, a thermodynamic model is developed in order to determine exergy destruction rates and calculate the exergy efficiency of the system. In the economic analysis, investment cost rates are calculated with respect to equipment costs, which are determined by cost correlations for each system component, and capital recovery factors. Thus, by combining the two analyses, an exergoeconomic model is created whereby the exergy streams are identified and cost equations are allocated for each component. The results of both exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses show that increasing the fluid mass flow rate decreases the exergy efficiency, and increasing the specific exergetic cooling rate decreases the cost per unit of cooling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Engelbrecht K, Bahl CRH (2010) Evaluating the effect of magnetocaloric properties on magnetic refrigeration performance. J Appl Phys 108:123918
Engelbrecht K, Nellis GF, Klein SA (2006) Predicting the performance of an active magnetic regenerator refrigerator used for space cooling and refrigeration. HVAC&R Res 12:1077–1095
Engelbrecht KL, Nellis GF, Klein SA (2006) The effect of internal temperature gradients on regenerator matrix performance. J Heat Transfer 128(10):1060–1069
Barclay JA, Steyert WA (1982) Active magnetic regenerator. US Patent No. 4,332,135
Barclay JA (1983) Wheel-type magnetic refrigerator. US Patent No. 4,408,463
Aprea C, Greco A, Maiorino A (2012) A dimensionless numerical analysis for the optimization of an active magnetic regenerative refrigerant cycle. Int J Energ Res 37:1475–1487
Tura A, Nielsen KK, Rowe A (2012) Experimental and modeling results of a parallel plate-based active magnetic regenerator. Int J Refrigeration 35(6):1518–1527
Li P, Gong M, Yao G, Wu J (2006) A practical model for analysis of active magnetic regenerative refrigerators for room temperature applications. Int J Refrigeration 29:1259–1266
Nellis GF, Klein SA (2006) Regenerative heat exchangers with significant entrained fluid heat capacity. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 49:329–340
Rowe A (2011) Thermodynamics of active magnetic regenerators: part I. Cryogenics 52:111–118
Rowe A (2011) Thermodynamics of active magnetic regenerators: part II. Cryogenics 52:119–128
Aprea C, Greco A, Maiorino A (2012) Modelling an active magnetic refrigeration system: a comparison with different models of incompressible flow through a packed bed. Appl Thermal Eng 36:296–306
Kitanovski A, Egolf PW (2009) Application of magnetic refrigeration and its assessment. J Magn Magn Mater 321:777–781
Bjørk R, Smith A, Bahl CRH, Pryds N (2011) Determining the minimum mass and cost of a magnetic refrigerator. Int J Refrigeration 34:1805–1816
Aprea C, Greco A, Maiorino A (2011) A numerical analysis of an active magnetic regenerative cascade system. Int J Energy Res 35:177–188
Rohsenow WM, Hartnett JP, Ganic ENI (1985) Handbook of heat transfer, vol 6. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 10–11
Kaviany M (1995) Principles of heat transfer in porous media. Springer, New York, 33, 46–47, 130, 228–229
Rowe A (2011) Configuration and performance analysis of magnetic refrigerators. Int J Refrigeration 34:168–177
Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M (1996) Thermal design and optimization. Wiley, New York
Dobrovicescu A, Tsatsaronis G, Stanciu D, Apostol V (2011) Consideration upon exergy destruction and exergoeconomic analysis of a refrigerating system. Revista de Chimie 62(12):1168–1174
Bjørk R, Engelbrecht K (2011) The influence of the magnetic field on the performance of an active magnetic regenerator (AMR). Int J Refrigeration 34:192–203
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Nomenclature
Nomenclature
- Ac :
-
Cross-sectional area, m 2
- asf :
-
Specific surface area, m2/m3
- c:
-
Specific heat capacity, J kg K−1
- COP:
-
Coefficient of performance
- D:
-
Diameter of the regenerator section, m
- dP :
-
Diameter of the particles, μm
- \( \dot{\mathrm{E}}\mathrm{x} \) :
-
Exergy flow rate (W)
- h:
-
Convection coefficient (W m−2 K−1)
- H:
-
Magnetic field, A m−1
- Hmax :
-
Maximum magnetic field, A m−1
- k:
-
Thermal conductivity, W m−1 K−1
- L:
-
Length of the regenerator, m
- m:
-
Mass, kg
- \( \dot{\mathrm{m}} \) :
-
Mass flow rate, kg s−1
- M:
-
Magnetic intensity, A m−1
- MCE:
-
Magnetocaloric effect
- MCM:
-
Magnetocaloric material
- Nu:
-
Nusselt number
- Pr:
-
Prandtl number
- \( \dot{Q} \) :
-
Heat transfer rate, W
- Re:
-
Reynolds number
- s:
-
Specific entropy (J kg−1 K−1)
- t:
-
Time coordinate, s
- T:
-
Temperature, K
- t1 :
-
Magnetization time step (s)
- t2 :
-
Isofield cooling time step (s)
- t3 :
-
Demagnetization time step (s)
- t4 :
-
Isofield heating time step (s)
- V:
-
Volume, L
- x:
-
Axial position, m
- x :
-
Mass fraction
- \( \dot{W} \) :
-
Work, kJ s−1
- ΔP :
-
Pressure drop, Pa
- ε :
-
Porosity of the regenerator bed
- μ 0 :
-
Permeability of free space (m kg s−2 A−2)
- ρ :
-
Density kg m−3
- η :
-
Efficiency (-)
- μ:
-
The specific exergy cooling of the system (W T−1 L−1)
- ad:
-
Adiabatic
- C:
-
Cold or refrigeration temperature
- D:
-
Demagnetization
- des:
-
Destruction
- ex:
-
Exergy
- f:
-
Fluid
- H:
-
Hot or heat rejection temperature
- I:
-
First stage of the cascade system
- II:
-
Second stage of the cascade system
- M:
-
Magnetization
- P:
-
Pump
- s:
-
Solid
- t1 :
-
Magnetization process
- t2 :
-
Isofield cooling process
- t3 :
-
Demagnetization process
- t4 :
-
Isofield heating process
- wg:
-
Water–glycol mixture
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ganjehsarabi, H., Dincer, I., Gungor, A. (2014). Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Cascade Active Magnetic Regenerative Refrigeration System. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04680-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04681-5
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)