Abstract
In this chapter, exergoeconomic analysis is performed for a hybrid system combining gasifier and solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) as the core units. The pressurised SOFC considered is a planar type in geometry, operating at 1,000 K, and the gasifier gasifies biomass (sawdust) in a media of steam and operates near atmospheric pressure and at a range of operating temperature of 1,023–1,423 K. The analysis is conducted at steam–biomass ratio of 0.8 kmol-steam per kmol-biomass. The gasification system has a capacity of 8.1–8.6 kg h−1 from the steam gasification-derived hydrogen, and the SOFC has an efficiency of 50.3 % and utilises the hydrogen produced from gasifier to generate power. Exergoeconomic analyses are performed to investigate and describe the exergetic and economic interaction between the system components through calculating the exergy costs of the streams for each component of this hybrid system. In the studied gasification temperature range and on the basis of electricity cost of 0.1046 $/kWh, it is found that both primary and secondary hydrogen costs decrease. The unit of exergy from primary hydrogen costs 0.103–0.045 $/kWh, while the unit of exergy from secondary hydrogen costs 0.064–0.039 $/kWh.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dincer I, Rosen MA (2005) Thermodynamic aspects of renewable and sustainable. Dev Renew Sust Energ Rev 9:169–189
Omosun O, Bauen A, Brandon NP, Adjiman CS, Hart D (2004) Modelling system efficiencies and costs of two biomass-fuelled SOFC systems. J Power Sources 131(1–2):96–106
Balli O, Aras H, Hepbasli A (2008) Exergoeconomic analysis of a combined heat and power (CHP) system. Int J Energy Res 32:273–289
Tsatsaronis G, Winhold M (1985) Exergoeconomic analysis and evaluation of energy-conversion plants-I. A new general methodology. Energy 10:69–80
Tsatsaronis G, Pisa J (1994) Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of energy systems application to the CGAM problem. Energy 19(3):287–321
Kim SM, Doek S, Kwon YH, Kwak HY (1998) Exergoeconomic analysis of thermal systems. Energy 23:393–406
Colpan CO, Yesin T (2006) Energetic, exergetic and thermoeconomic analysis of Bilkent combined cycle cogeneration plant. Int J Energy Res 30:875–894
Iwasaki W (2003) A consideration of the economic efficiency of hydrogen production from biomass. Int J Hydrog Energy 28:939–944
Ogden JM (1999) Developing an infrastructure for hydrogen vehicles: a South California case study. Int J Hydrog Energy 24:709–730
Richards M, Liss M (2003) Reformer-based hydrogen fueling station economics. July 2002. In: Iwasaki, W., A consideration of the economic efficiency of hydrogen production from biomass. Int J Hydrog Energy 28:939–944
Georgi D (2002) Hydrogen extraction, more than one way to skin the cat. In: Iwasaki W. A consideration of the economic efficiency of hydrogen production from biomass. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2003;28:939–944
Abuadala A, Dincer I, Naterer GF (2010) Exergy analysis of hydrogen production from biomass gasification. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:4981–4990
Abuadala A, Dincer I (2010) Efficiency evaluation of dry hydrogen production from biomass gasification. Thermochim Acta 507–508:127–134
Abuadala A, Dincer I (2012) Investigation of a multi-generation system using hybrid steam biomass gasification for hydrogen, power and heat. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:13146–13157. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.012
Fryda L, Panopoulos KD, Karl J, Kakaras E (2008) Exergetic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell and biomass gasification integration with heat pipes. Energy 33:292–299
Hulteberg PC, Karlsson HT (2009) A study of combined biomass gasification and electrolysis for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:772–782
Simell PA, Hirvensalo EK, Smolander ST, Krause AO (1999) Steam reforming of gasification gas tar over dolomite with benzene as a model compound. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:1250–1257
Szargut J Morris DR, Steward FR (2007) Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical and metallurgical processes. In: Pellegrini LF, Jr, Oliveira S. Exergy analysis of sugarcane bagasse gasification. Energy 32:314–327
Shieh JH, Fan LT (1982) Estimation of energy (enthalpy) and exergy (availability) contents in structurally complicated materials. Energy Sources 6:1–46
Turn S, Kinoshita C, Zhang Z, Ishimura D, Zhou J (1998) An experimental investigation of hydrogen production from biomass gasification. Int J Hydrog Energy 23:641–648
Cengel YA, Boles MA (2008) Thermodynamics: an engineering approach, 6th edn. Mc Graw Hill Companies, Inc, New York
Hyman D, Kay WB (1949) In: Li C, Suzuki K (2009) Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification-An overview 13:594–604
Lowry HH (1963) In: Eisermann W, Johnson P, Conger WL (1979) Estimating thermodynamic properties of coal, char, tar and ash. Fuel Process Technol 3:39–53
Eisermann W, Johnson P, Conger WL (1979) Estimating thermodynamic properties of coal, char, tar and ash. Fuel Process Technol 3:39–53
Valero A, Lozano MA, Serra L (1994) CGAM problem: definition and conventional solution. Energy 19(3):279–286
Gaggioli RA, Wepfer WJ (1960) Exergy economics. Energy 5:823–837
Tsatsaronis, G. Application of thermoeconomics to the design and synthesis of energy plants, energy, energy system analysis, and optimization. http://www.eolss.net/ebooks/Sample%20Chapters/C08/E3-19-02-07.pdf
Lazzaretto A, Tsatsaronis G (2006) SPECO: a systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy 31:1257–1289
Moran MJ, Shapiro HN (2007) Fundamentals of engineering thermodynamics. John Wiley, Inc., New York
Calise F, d’Accadia MD, Vanoli L, Von Spakovsky MR (2007) Full load synthesis/design optimization of a hybrid SOFC–GT power plant. Energy 32:446–458
Palazzi F, Autissier N, Marechal F, Favrat D (2007) A methodology for thermo-economic modeling and optimization of solid oxide fuel cell systems. Appl Therm Eng 27:2703–2712
Penniall CL, Williamson CL (2009) Feasibility study into the potential for gasification plant in the New Zealand wood processing industry. Energy Policy 37:3377–3386
Ogden JM (1999) Prospects for building a hydrogen energy infrastructure. Ann Rev Energy Envision 24:227–279
Acknowledgements
The first author would like to acknowledge a support of Libyan Ministry for Education via Libyan Embassy in Canada. The support provided by University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) is also greatly acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Nomenclature
Nomenclature
- A :
-
Area (m2)
- C :
-
Carbon content in biomass (wt %)
- c :
-
Cost per unit of exergy ($/kWh)
- \( \dot{C} \) :
-
Exergy cost rate ($/h)
- \( {\dot{C}}_o \) :
-
Annualised cost of a component ($/y)
- C 0 :
-
Initial investment cost of a component ($)
- CRF :
-
Capital recovery factor (–)
- Cp :
-
Constant pressure-specific heat (kJ/kg K)
- \( \overline{C}p \) :
-
Constant pressure-specific heat (kJ/kmol K)
- ER :
-
Exchange rate (CA$/US$)
- Ex :
-
Specific exergy (kJ/kg or kJ/kmol)
- \( \dot{E}x \) :
-
Exergy rate (kW)
- Ex o :
-
Standard exergy (kJ/kmol)
- h :
-
Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg or kJ/kmol)
- h O f :
-
Standard enthalpy of formation (kJ/kmol)
- H :
-
Hydrogen content in biomass (wt %)
- i :
-
Interest rate (%)
- j :
-
Salvage ratio (%)
- LHV :
-
Lower heating value (kJ/kg)
- \( \dot{m} \) :
-
Mass flow rate (kg/s)
- N :
-
Nitrogen content in biomass (wt %)
- n :
-
Number of moles (kmol) or lifetime of components (years)
- \( \dot{N} \) :
-
Molar flow rate (kmol/s)
- O :
-
Oxygen content in biomass (wt %)
- P 0 :
-
Reference pressure (101.325 kPa)
- Pr :
-
Biomass cost ($/GJ)
- PW :
-
Present worth ($)
- PWF :
-
Present worth factor (–)
- R :
-
Universal gas constant (8.314 kJ kmol−1 K−1)
- s :
-
Specific entropy (kJ/kg K)
- \( \overline{s} \) :
-
Specific entropy (kJ/kmol K)
- S :
-
Sulphur content in biomass (wt %)
- S n :
-
Salvage value ($)
- \( \dot{S} \) :
-
Entropy generation (kW/K)
- T :
-
Temperature (K)
- T 0 :
-
Reference temperature (298 K)
- U f :
-
Utilisation factor (–)
- \( \dot{W} \) :
-
Power (kW)
- X :
-
Mole fraction (–)
- \( \dot{Z} \) :
-
Cost of owning and operating a component ($/h)
- Ø :
-
Maintenance factor (–)
- τ :
-
Annual component operation time at the nominal capacity (h)
- β :
-
Quality coefficient (–)
- air :
-
Air
- biomass :
-
Biomass
- ch :
-
Related to chemical exergy
- CO 2 :
-
Related to carbon dioxide
- e :
-
Exit
- f :
-
Fuel
- F :
-
Filter
- HE :
-
Heat exchanger
- H 2 :
-
Related to hydrogen
- H 2 O :
-
Related to water
- i :
-
Inlet
- o :
-
At reference or ambient or initial
- O 2 :
-
Related to oxygen
- ph :
-
Related to physical exergy
- des :
-
Destruction
- Sep :
-
Separator
- SOFC :
-
Solid oxide fuel cell
- SRR :
-
Steam-reforming reactor
- SSR :
-
Steam shift reactor
- STACK :
-
Stack
- t :
-
Turbine
- tar :
-
Related to tar
- W :
-
Power or electricity
- Over dot :
-
Quantity per time
- Over bar :
-
Quantity per kmol
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abuadala, A., Dincer, I. (2014). Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Hybrid Steam Biomass Gasification-Based Tri-Generation System. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04680-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04681-5
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)