Skip to main content

Exergetic Assessment of a Hybrid Steam Biomass Gasification and SOFC System for Hydrogen, Power, and Heat Production

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment

Abstract

In this chapter, an integrated process of steam biomass gasification and a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) for multi-generation purposes (hydrogen, power, and heat) is thermodynamically studied, and its performance is assessed through exergy efficiency. The scheme combines SOFC at 1,000 K and 1.2 bar and a gasifier which is used to gasify saw dust with a steam–biomass ratio of 0.8 kmol/kmol and a gasification temperature range of 1,023–1,423 K at an atmospheric pressure. A parametric study is performed to assess exergetic efficiency and investigate the effect of various parameters related to the different system components such as airflow rate and preheating temperature on the efficiency. The results show that SOFC is a major source of the system destruction exergy. For the gasification temperature range studied here, the system exergetic efficiency increases with hydrogen yield from about 22 to 32 % and the overall exergy efficiency, which considers electricity production, decreases from 57.5 to 51 %, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baratieri M, Baggio P, Fiori L, Grigiante M (2008) Biomass as an energy source: thermodynamic constraints on the performance of the conversion process. Bioresour Technol 99:7063–7073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 2): conversion technologies. Bioresour Technol 83:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fermoso J, Arias B, Gil MV, Plaza MG, Pevida C, Pis JJ, Rubiera F (2010) Co-gasification of different rank coals with biomass and petroleum coke in a high-pressure reactor for H2-rich gas production. Bioresour Technol 101:3230–3235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Turner J, Sverdrup G, Mann MK, Maness P, Kroposki B, Ghirardi M, Evans RJ, Blake D (2008) Renewable hydrogen production. Int J Energy Res 32:379–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bavarsad PG (2007) Energy and exergy analysis of internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine hybrid system. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:4591–4599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Costamagna P, Magistri L, Massardo AF (2001) Design and part-load performance of a hybrid system based on a solid oxide fuel cell reactor and a micro gas turbine. J Power Sources 96:352–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Balli O, Aras H, Hepbasli A (2007) Exergetic performance evaluation of a combined heat and power (CHP) system in Turkey. Int J Energy Res 31:849–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Calise F, Palombo A, Vanoli L (2006) Design and partial load exergy analysis of a hybrid SOFC-GT power plant. In: Akkaya AV, Sahin B, Erdem HH (eds) An analysis of SOFC/GT CHP system based on exergetic performance criteria. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 (2008) 2566–2577

    Google Scholar 

  9. Akkaya AV, Sahin B, Erdem HH (2008) An analysis of SOFC/GT CHP system based on exergetic performance criteria. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:2566–2577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fryda L, Panopoulos K, Karl D, Kakaras JE (2008) Exergetic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell and biomass gasification integration with heat pipes. Energy 33:292–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abuadala A, Dincer I (2010) Investigation of a multi-generation system using hybrid steam biomass gasification for hydrogen, power and heat. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:13146–13157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hulteberg PC, Karlsson HT (2009) A study of combined biomass gasification and electrolysis for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:772–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Simell PA, Hirvensalo EK, Smolander ST, Krause AO (1999) Steam reforming of gasification gas tar over dolomite with benzene as a model compound. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:1250–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Szargut J, Morris DR, Steward FR (2007) Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical and metallurgical processes, 1988. In: Pellegrini LF, Oliveira S Jr (eds.) Exergy analysis of sugarcane bagasse gasification. Energy 32 314–327

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shieh JH, Fan LT (1982) Estimation of energy (enthalpy) and exergy (availability) contents in structurally complicated materials. Energy Sources 6:1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Turn S, Kinoshita C, Zhang Z, Ishimura D, Zhou J (1998) An experimental investigation of hydrogen production from biomass gasification. Int J Hydrog Energy 23:641–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cengel YA, Boles MA (2008) Thermodynamics: an engineering approach, 6th edn. Mc Graw Hill Companies Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li C, Suzuki K (2009) Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification — An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13:594–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hyman D, Kay WB (1949) Heat capacity and content of tars and pitches. Ind Eng Chem 41:1764–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eisermann W, Johnson P, Conger WL (1979) Estimating thermodynamic properties of coal, char, tar and ash. Fuel Process Technol 3:39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kakaça S, Pramuanjaroenkij A, Zhou XY (2007) A review of numerical modeling of solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:761–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan SH, Low CF, Ding OL (2002) Energy and exergy analysis of simple solid-oxide fuel-cell power systems. J Power Sources 103:188–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Costamagna P, Selimovic A, Borghi MD, Agnewc G (2004) Electrochemical model of the integrated planar solid oxide fuel cell (IP-SOFC). Chem Eng J 102:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bessette NF II, Wepfer WJ, Winnick J (1995) A mathematical model of a solid oxide fuel cell. J Electrochem Soc 142:3792–3800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Colpan CO, Dincer I, Hamdullahpur F (2007) Thermodynamic modeling of direct internal reforming solid oxide fuel cells operating with syngas. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:787–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT). The first author would like to acknowledge a support of Libyan Ministry for Education via Libyan Embassy in Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdussalam Abuadala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Nomenclature

Nomenclature

C :

Carbon content in biomass (w %)

D aeff :

Effective gaseous diffusivity through the anode (cm2/s)

D ceff :

Effective gaseous diffusivity through the cathode (cm2/s)

E :

Ohmic symmetry factor

Ex :

Exergy (kJ/kg or kJ/kmol)

Ex o :

Standard exergy (kJ/kmol)

F :

Faraday constant (96,485 coulombs/g mol)

H :

Hydrogen content in biomass (w %)

h :

Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg or kJ/kmol)

I :

Circuit current (A)

i :

Current density (mA/cm2)

i o :

Apparent exchange current density (A/cm2)

LHV :

Lower heating value (kJ/kg)

\( \dot{m} \) :

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

N :

Nitrogen content in biomass (w %)

\( \dot{N} \) :

Molar flow rate (kmol/s)

\( {\dot{n}}_{H2} \) :

Hydrogen fed to SOFC (kmol/s)

O :

Oxygen content in biomass (w %)

P :

Pressure (pa or atm)

R :

Universal gas constant (8.314 kJ kmol−1 K−1)

S :

Total entropy (kJ/K)

s :

Specific entropy (kJ/kg K or kJ/kmol K)

T :

Temperature (K)

t :

Thickness (cm)

U F :

Utilization factor (–)

V :

Circuit or overpotential volt (volts)

\( \dot{W} \) :

Power (W or kW)

X :

Mole fraction (–)

a :

Anode

act :

Activation

biomass :

Biomass

c :

Cathode

ch :

Chemical

con :

Concentration

dc :

Power from DC

des :

Destroyed

e :

Exit

el :

Electrical

gen :

Generation

H 2 :

Hydrogen

H 2 O :

Water

i :

Inlet

o :

Reference or ambient

O 2 :

Oxygen

ohm :

Ohmic

ph :

Physical

pol :

Polarization

res :

Resistance

SOFC :

Solid oxide fuel cell

t :

Turbine

tar :

Tar

Over dot :

Quantity per time

Over bar :

Quantity per kmol

SOFC :

Solid oxide fuel cell

β :

Quality coefficient (−)

ΔG :

Standard Gibbs function of reaction (kJ/kg)

η :

Efficiency (−)

ρ :

Resistivity (Ω-cm)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abuadala, A., Dincer, I. (2014). Exergetic Assessment of a Hybrid Steam Biomass Gasification and SOFC System for Hydrogen, Power, and Heat Production. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04680-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04681-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics