Skip to main content

Thermodynamic and Cost Analyses of a Residential Hybrid PV–Fuel Cell–Battery System for a Canadian House

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment

Abstract

A residential photovoltaic (PV)-based hydrogen fuel cell system is analyzed using energy and exergy methods, and its monthly performance is investigated. The PV system is accompanied by a water electrolyser for hydrogen production, a lead acid battery pack, and a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) for reconverting the hydrogen produced to electricity during periods of solar unavailability. The solar irradiance is based on a monthly average in Toronto in 2011. The energy and exergy analysis results reported include the PV power output and the shares attributable to the battery and the SOFC in meeting the electrical demand. The exergy destructions of the main components and the overall efficiencies are presented. A cost analysis is performed to determine the electricity unit cost over the system lifetime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shabani B, Andrews J, Watkins S (2010) Energy and cost analysis of a solar-hydrogen combined heat and power system for remote power supply using a computer simulation. Sol Energy 84:144–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lagorse J, Simoes MG, Miraoui A, Costerg P (2008) Energy cost analysis of a solar-hydrogen hybrid energy system for stand-alone applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:2871–2879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morrison IB, Mottillo M, Ferguson A, Ribberink H, Yang L, Haddad K (2006) The simulation of a renewable-energy-powered hydrogen-based residential electricity system. Second national IBPSA-USA conference, Cambridge, MA, 2–4 August 2006

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hosseini M, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2013) Hybrid solar-fuel cell CHP Systems for residential applications: energy and exergy analyses. J Power Sources 221:372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Santarelli M, Cali M, Macagno S (2004) Design and analysis of stand-alone hydrogen energy systems with different renewable sources. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29:1571–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Uzunoglu M, Onar OC, Alam MS (2009) Modeling, control and simulation of a PV/FC/UC based hybrid power generation system for stand-alone applications. Renew Energy 34:509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sukamongkol Y, Chungpaibulpatana S, Ongsakul W (2002) A simulation model for predicting the performance of a solar photovoltaic system with alternating current loads. Renew Energy 27:237–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chenni R, Makhlouf M, Kerbache T, Bouzid A (2007) A detailed modeling method for photovoltaic cells. Energy 32:1724–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nordin A, Omar A (2011) Modeling and simulation of photovoltaic (PV) array and maximum power point tracker (MPPT) for grid-connected PV system. 3rd international symposium and exhibition in sustainable energy and environment, Melaka, Malaysia, 1–3 June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke RE, Giddey S, Ciacchi FT, Badwal SPS, Paul B, Andrews J (2009) Direct coupling of an electrolyser to a solar PV system for generating hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:2531–2542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. La O’ GJ, In HJ, Crumlin E, Barbastathis G, Horn YSh (2007) Recent advances in microdevices for electrochemical energy conversion and storage. Int J Energy Res 31:548–575

    Google Scholar 

  12. Colpan CO, Dincer I, Hamdullahpur F (2007) Thermodynamic modeling of direct internal reforming solid oxide fuel cells operating with syngas. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32:787–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Motahar S, Alemrajabi AA (2009) Exergy based performance analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell and steam injected gas turbine hybrid power system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:2396–2407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Knight I, Kreutzer N, Manning M, Swinton M, Ribberink H (2007) European and Canadian non-HVAC electric demand and DHW load profiles for use in simulating the performance of residential cogeneration systems. Annex 42, International Energy Agency, Energy Conversions in Buildings and Community System Programme, May 2007

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weather Data, Department of Geography, University of Toronto Mississauga (2012) http://www.utm.utoronto.ca/geography/resources/meteorological-station/weather-data. Accessed 26 June 2012

  16. Sun Power Corporation (2012) Document #001-42023, 210 solar panel. http://www.prevailingwindpower.com/sunpower.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2012

  17. Enbar N (2010) PV O&M best practices. Utility/lab workshop on PV technology and systems. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 8–9 November 2010

    Google Scholar 

  18. Braun RJ, Klein SA, Reindl DT (2011) Assessment of solid oxide fuel cells in building applications, phase 1: modeling and preliminary analyses. Prepared for Energy Center of Wisconsin, Report 207-R, November 2011

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang X, Chan SH, Li G, Ho HK, Li J, Feng Z (2010) A review of integration strategies for solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 195:685–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Hosseini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Nomenclature

Nomenclature

ex :

Specific exergy, kJ/kg

\( \overset{.}{ En} \) :

Energy flow rate, kW

\( \overset{.}{ Ex} \) :

Exergy flow rate, kW

G :

Solar irradiance, W/m2

I L :

PV light current, A

I 0 :

Reverse saturation current, A

I :

PV electric current, A

k :

Boltzmann constant

k t :

Manufacturer supplied temperature coefficient of short-circuit current, A/°C

LHV:

Lower heating value, kJ/kg

\( \dot{m} \) :

Mass flow rate, kg/s

P :

Power, kW

\( \dot{Q} \) :

Heat transfer rate, kW

R s :

Series resistance of the PV cells, Ohm

T :

Temperature, K

V :

Voltage, V

\( \dot{W} \) :

Work rate, kW

γ:

PV cell shape factor

η:

Energy efficiency, %

ψ:

Exergy efficiency, %

0:

Ambient condition

cell:

PV cells

H2 :

Hydrogen

in, el:

Input to the electrolyser

mp:

Maximum power

SOFC:

Solid oxide fuel cell

CHP:

Combined heat and power

PV:

Photovoltaic

SOFC:

Solid oxide fuel cell

STC:

Standard test condition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hosseini, M., Dincer, I., Rosen, M.A. (2014). Thermodynamic and Cost Analyses of a Residential Hybrid PV–Fuel Cell–Battery System for a Canadian House. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04680-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04681-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics