Skip to main content
  • 2469 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical predictions about individual patients’ total duration of mechanical ventilation or their duration of weaning are routinely made by intensivists as part of care of ventilated patients. Although these predictions may not be systematically elaborated or formally expressed, they influence important clinical decisions. The decision about whether and when to perform a tracheostomy is one of particular importance. Weaning and other aspects of care might be facilitated by an early tracheostomy in patients who will need a lengthy course of invasive ventilation. Other decisions that may also be influenced by such predictions include the initiation of enteral nutrition, the use of intensive glycemic control, the inclusion of patients in clinical trials, and the possible transfer of patients to referral centers for mechanical ventilation or weaning. However, the accuracy of these clinical predictions by intensivists, either in the setting of clinical research [1] or practice [2], has been shown to be quite limited. Therefore, objective tools that allow accurate predictions of these outcomes, prolonged ventilation or difficult weaning, have been sought to assist physicians with these decisions. These tools include the identification of risk factors and the development of predictive models. In this case, predictive models are mathematical tools that combine results of several variables assessed at an early point in the course of mechanical ventilation to estimate either the probability that a patient will require “prolonged” ventilation (or weaning), or its actual duration. This chapter reviews studies aimed at identifying risk factors for and developing predictive models of prolonged mechanical ventilation and weaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

APACHE:

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation

APS:

Acute Physiology Score

ARDS:

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

AUC:

Area Under the receiver operating characteristics Curve

BUN:

Blood Urea Nitrogen

COPD:

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

CRP:

C-reactive protein

GCS:

Glasgow Coma Scale

ICU:

Intensive Care Unit

LIS:

Lung Injury Score

OSFI:

Number of organ system failures

NIV:

Noninvasive Ventilation

NPV:

Negative predictive value

PEEP:

Positive end-expiratory pressure

PPV:

Positive predictive value

ROC:

Receiver Operating Characteristics

SAPS:

Simplified Acute Physiology Score

Se:

Sensitivity

Sp:

Specificity

SS:

Sepsis Score

References

  1. Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, et al. Effect of early vs. late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the TracMan randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309:2121–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Figueroa-Casas JB, Connery SM, Montoya R, et al. Accuracy of early prediction of duration of mechanical ventilation by intensivists. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013;11:182–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackwood B, Clarke M, Mcauley DF, et al. How outcomes are defined in clinical trials of mechanically ventilated adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:886–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Contentin L, Ehrmann S, Giraudeau B. Heterogeneity in the definition of mechanical ventilation duration and ventilator-free days. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:998–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sapijaszko MJA, Brant R, Sandham D, et al. Nonrespiratory predictor of mechanical ventilation dependency in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:601–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Estenssoro E, Gonzalez F, Laffaire E, et al. Shock on admission day is the best predictor of prolonged mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Chest. 2005;127:598–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Troche G, Moine P. Is the duration of mechanical ventilation predictable? Chest. 1997;112:745–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark PA, Lettieri CJ. Clinical model for predicting prolonged mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2013;28:880e1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seneff MG, Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, et al. Predicting the duration of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1996;110:469–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Papuzinski C, Durante M, Tobar C, et al. Predicting the need of tracheostomy amongst patients admitted to an intensive care unit: a multivariate model. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34:517–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Añón JM, Gomez-Tello V, Gonzalez-Higueras E, et al. Prolonged mechanical ventilation probability model. Med Intensiva. 2012;36:488–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Muriel A, et al. Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:220–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peñuelas O, Frutos-Vivar F, Fernandez C, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of ventilated patients according to time to liberation from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:430–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Funk G, Anders S, Breyer M, et al. Incidence and outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation according to new categories. Eur Respir J. 2010;35:88–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007;29:1033–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sellares J, Ferrer M, Cano E, et al. Predictors of prolonged weaning and survival during ventilator weaning in a respiratory ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:775–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Labarère J, Bertrand R, Fine MJ. How to derive and validate clinical prediction models for use in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:513–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan B. Figueroa-Casas MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Figueroa-Casas, J.B. (2016). Predictive Models of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Difficult Weaning. In: Esquinas, A. (eds) Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation and Difficult Weaning in Critical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04259-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04259-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04258-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04259-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics