Abstract
Clinical predictions about individual patients’ total duration of mechanical ventilation or their duration of weaning are routinely made by intensivists as part of care of ventilated patients. Although these predictions may not be systematically elaborated or formally expressed, they influence important clinical decisions. The decision about whether and when to perform a tracheostomy is one of particular importance. Weaning and other aspects of care might be facilitated by an early tracheostomy in patients who will need a lengthy course of invasive ventilation. Other decisions that may also be influenced by such predictions include the initiation of enteral nutrition, the use of intensive glycemic control, the inclusion of patients in clinical trials, and the possible transfer of patients to referral centers for mechanical ventilation or weaning. However, the accuracy of these clinical predictions by intensivists, either in the setting of clinical research [1] or practice [2], has been shown to be quite limited. Therefore, objective tools that allow accurate predictions of these outcomes, prolonged ventilation or difficult weaning, have been sought to assist physicians with these decisions. These tools include the identification of risk factors and the development of predictive models. In this case, predictive models are mathematical tools that combine results of several variables assessed at an early point in the course of mechanical ventilation to estimate either the probability that a patient will require “prolonged” ventilation (or weaning), or its actual duration. This chapter reviews studies aimed at identifying risk factors for and developing predictive models of prolonged mechanical ventilation and weaning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- APACHE:
-
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation
- APS:
-
Acute Physiology Score
- ARDS:
-
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- AUC:
-
Area Under the receiver operating characteristics Curve
- BUN:
-
Blood Urea Nitrogen
- COPD:
-
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- CRP:
-
C-reactive protein
- GCS:
-
Glasgow Coma Scale
- ICU:
-
Intensive Care Unit
- LIS:
-
Lung Injury Score
- OSFI:
-
Number of organ system failures
- NIV:
-
Noninvasive Ventilation
- NPV:
-
Negative predictive value
- PEEP:
-
Positive end-expiratory pressure
- PPV:
-
Positive predictive value
- ROC:
-
Receiver Operating Characteristics
- SAPS:
-
Simplified Acute Physiology Score
- Se:
-
Sensitivity
- Sp:
-
Specificity
- SS:
-
Sepsis Score
References
Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, et al. Effect of early vs. late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the TracMan randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309:2121–9.
Figueroa-Casas JB, Connery SM, Montoya R, et al. Accuracy of early prediction of duration of mechanical ventilation by intensivists. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013;11:182–5.
Blackwood B, Clarke M, Mcauley DF, et al. How outcomes are defined in clinical trials of mechanically ventilated adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:886–93.
Contentin L, Ehrmann S, Giraudeau B. Heterogeneity in the definition of mechanical ventilation duration and ventilator-free days. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:998–1002.
Sapijaszko MJA, Brant R, Sandham D, et al. Nonrespiratory predictor of mechanical ventilation dependency in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:601–7.
Estenssoro E, Gonzalez F, Laffaire E, et al. Shock on admission day is the best predictor of prolonged mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Chest. 2005;127:598–603.
Troche G, Moine P. Is the duration of mechanical ventilation predictable? Chest. 1997;112:745–51.
Clark PA, Lettieri CJ. Clinical model for predicting prolonged mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2013;28:880e1–7.
Seneff MG, Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, et al. Predicting the duration of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1996;110:469–79.
Papuzinski C, Durante M, Tobar C, et al. Predicting the need of tracheostomy amongst patients admitted to an intensive care unit: a multivariate model. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34:517–22.
Añón JM, Gomez-Tello V, Gonzalez-Higueras E, et al. Prolonged mechanical ventilation probability model. Med Intensiva. 2012;36:488–95.
Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Muriel A, et al. Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:220–30.
Peñuelas O, Frutos-Vivar F, Fernandez C, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of ventilated patients according to time to liberation from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:430–7.
Funk G, Anders S, Breyer M, et al. Incidence and outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation according to new categories. Eur Respir J. 2010;35:88–94.
Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007;29:1033–56.
Sellares J, Ferrer M, Cano E, et al. Predictors of prolonged weaning and survival during ventilator weaning in a respiratory ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:775–84.
Labarère J, Bertrand R, Fine MJ. How to derive and validate clinical prediction models for use in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:513–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Figueroa-Casas, J.B. (2016). Predictive Models of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Difficult Weaning. In: Esquinas, A. (eds) Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation and Difficult Weaning in Critical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04259-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04259-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04258-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04259-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)