Abstract
Socio-economic indicators are not fully developed and operational while this is an important aspect of sustainability. Seven case studies were analyzed within the Global-Bio-Pact project covering seven countries and five feedstock types. The 100 indicators that are identified are analyzed and evaluated to derive valuable lessons and recommendations. From this analysis it becomes clear that it is essential to look at impacts on different levels: national, regional, and local. This is because, e.g., impacts on a local level are not always reflected in macroeconomic indicators and vice versa. Background indicators, e.g., GDP in a region or the level of unemployment, do not necessarily link directly to bioenergy impacts but can provide a snapshot of the setting in which bioenergy projects operate. This can identify potential important areas of concern (with negative or positive impacts) beforehand. There is a trade-off between accuracy of the data and practicability. This can vary per country and per feedstock depending on data availability. More (accurate) data collection is required on all levels (national, regional, and local). Furthermore, more methodologies, based on quantitative data, have to be developed to gain better insight in socio-economic impacts on the long term.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arndt, C., Benfica, R., Tarp, F., Thurlow, J., & Uaiene, R. (2009). Biofuels, poverty, and growth: A computable general equilibrium analysis of mozambique. Environment and Development Economics, 15, 81–105.
Burrel, T., Ouattara, O., Sokona, M., & Togola, I. (2011). Socio-economic impacts of Jatropha production and its conversion routes in Mali. Bamako: Mali-Folkecenter Nyetaa.
CĂ¡rdenas, A., & Fallot, A. (2011). Socio-economic impacts of the sugar cane-to-ethanol production chain in Costa Rica. Turrialba: CATIE.
Diaz-Chavez, R. A. (2010). Assessing biofuels: Aiming for sustainable development or complying with the market? Energy Policy, 39, 5763–5769.
FAOSTAT. (2012). FAO statistical database. Accessed 10-12-2012 at http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E
GBEP. (2011). Sustainability Indicators for Bioenergy. Global Bioenergy Partnership. 223 pages, available from: http://www.globalbioenergy.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gbep/docs/Indicators/The_GBEP_Sustainability_Indicators_for_Bioenergy_FINAL.pdf
Gerber Machado, P., & Walter, A. (2011). Socio-economic impacts of the sugar cane chain in Brazil. Campinas: UNICAMP.
Herreras Martinez, S., Van Eijck, J., Pereira da Cunha, M., Walter, A., Guilhoto, J. J. M., & Faaij, A. (2013). Analysis of socio-economic impacts of sustainable sugar cane-ethanol production by means of inter-regional input-output analysis: Demonstrated for Northeast Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 28, pp. 290–316.
Janssen, R., & Rutz, D. (2011). Sustainability of biofuels in Latin America: Risks and opportunities. Energy Policy, 39, 5717–5725.
Lamers, P., Hamelinck, C., Junginger, M., & Faaij, A. (2011). International bioenergy trade-A review of past developments in the liquid biofuel market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 2655–2676.
Lewandowski, I., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2006). Steps towards the development of a certification system for sustainable bio-energy trade. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 83–104.
NEN. (2011). Netherlands Technical Agreement NTA8080. Nederlands Normalisatie-institute.
RSB. (2010). RSB Principles and Criteria 05/11/2010 Version 2.0. Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels (RSB). Available from http://rsb.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/rsb2/files/Biofuels/Version%202/PCs%20V2/10-11-12%20RSB%20PCs%20Version%202.pdf
Sawe, E. N., Shuma, J., & Pesambili, L. C. (2011). Socio-economic impacts of the Jatropha chain in Tanzania. Dar-es-Salaam: TATEDO.
Sbarra, R., & Hilbert, J. (2011). Socio-economic impacts of the Soy chain in Argentina. Buenos Aires: INTA.
Sleen, P. v., Vis, M., Abban-Mensah, I., & Bottriel, K. (2011). Socio-economic impacts of lignocellulosic biomass in Canada. Enschede: BTG, Proforest.
Smeets, E., Junginger, M., Faaij, A., Walter, A., Dolzan, P., & Turkenburg, W. (2008). The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol-An assessment of the possibilities of certified production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32, 781–813.
van Dam, J., & Junginger, M. (2011). Striving to further harmonization of sustainability criteria for bioenergy in Europe: Recommendations from a stakeholder questionnaire. Energy Policy, 39, 4051–4066.
van Dam, J., Junginger, M., Faaij, A., JĂ¼rgens, I., Best, G., & Fritsche, U. (2008). Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32, 749–780.
van Dam, J., Junginger, M., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2010). From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 2445–2472.
van der Hilst, F., Verstegen, J. A., Karssenberg, D., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2011). Spatiotemporal land use modelling to assess land availability for energy crops—illustrated for Mozambique. GCB Bioenergy.
Van Eijck, J., Romijn, H., Smeets, E., Bailis, R., Rooijakkers, M., Hooijkaas, N., Verweij, P., & Faaij, A. (in press). Comparative analysis of key socio-economic and environmental impacts of smallholder and plantation based jatropha biofuel production systems in Tanzania. Biomass and Bioenergy.
van Eijck, J., Smeets, E., & Faaij, A. (2012). The economic performance of jatropha, cassava and Eucalyptus production systems for energy in an East African smallholder setting. GCB Bioenergy, 4, 828–845.
Vissers, P., Paz, A., & Hanekamp, E. (2011). How to select a biomass certification scheme. Utrecht: Partners for Innovation BV, Agency NL.
Wicke, B., Smeets, E., Watson, H., & Faaij, A. (2011). The current bioenergy production potential of semi-arid and arid regions in sub-Saharan Africa. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 2773–2786.
Woods, J., & Diaz-Chavez, R. (2007). The environmental certification of biofuels. London: Joint Transport Research Centre, OECD, International Transport Forum, Imperial College.
Wright, A. (2011). Socio-economic impacts of the palm oil chain in Indonesia. Jakarta: Green Light Biofuels.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all members of the Global-Bio-Pact consortium, especially Martijn Vis who contributed to the analysis of these indicators.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Eijck, J., Faaij, A. (2014). Analysis of Socio-Economic Indicators on Different Bioenergy Case Studies. In: Rutz, D., Janssen, R. (eds) Socio-Economic Impacts of Bioenergy Production. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03829-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03829-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03828-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03829-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)