Abstract
This paper discusses the application of Co-variance Matrix Evolutionary Strategy (CMA-ES) in the design of non-fragile robust PI controller. The desired maximum sensitivity of the closed loop system is considered as an objective and success rate of stability under probabilistic controller uncertainty is taken as a constraint for non-fragile robust PI controller design problem. Success rate of stability is calculated using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) under probabilistic controller perturbation. CMA-ES finds the optimal controller parameter based on robustness objective and nonfragileness constraint. The Single Input Single Output (SISO) first order sugar cane raw juice neutralization process and second order Irrigation canal systems are considered as a test systems. The performance of the CMA-ES designed non-fragile robust PI controller is compared with the flat phase concept based PI controller and Astrom suggested PI controller for both test systems. Simulation results demonstrated that CMA-ES based non-fragile robust PI controller has better performance in robustness as well as non-fragileness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Keel, L.H., Bhattacharyya, S.P.: Robust, Fragile or Optimal. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 42(8) (August 1997)
Whidborne, J.F., Istepanian, R.S.H., Wu, J.: Reduction of Controller Fragility by Pole Sensitivity Minimization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 46(2) (February 2001)
Alfaro: PID controller fragility. ISA Transactions 46(4), 555–559 (2007)
Duan, Z., Huang, L., Wang, L.: Robustness analysis and synthesis of SISO systems under both plant and controller perturbations. Systems & Control Letters 42, 201–216 (2001)
Astrom, K.J.: Control system Design (2002)
Datta, A., Ho, M.-T., Bhattacharyya, S.P.: Structure and Synthesis of PID Controllers. Springer, London (2000)
Ho, M.T.: Non-fragile PID controller design. In: 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia (December 2000)
Monje, C.A., Calderon, A.J., Vinagre, B.M., Chen, Y., Feliu, V.: On Fractional PIλ Controllers: Some Tuning Rules for Robustness to Plant Uncertainties. Nonlinear Dynamics 38, 369–381 (2004)
Wittwer, J.W.: “Monte Carlo Simulation Basics From” Vertex42.com (June 1, 2004), http://www.vertex42.com/ExcelArticles/mc/MonteCarloSimulation.html
Ray, L., Stengel, R.F.: A Monte Carlo approach to the analysis of control system robustness. Automatica 29(1), 229–236 (1993)
Hansen, N.: The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorial (June 28, 2011)
Takahama, T., Sakai, S., Iwane, N.: Solving Nonlinear Constrained Optimization Problems by the ε Constrained Differential Evolution. In: 2006 IEEE Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Taipei, October 8-11 (2006)
O’Dwyer, A.: Handbook of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules. Imperial College Press (2009)
Mor˘arescu, I.-C.: Stability Crossing Boundaries and Fragility Characterization of PID Controllers for SISO Systems with I/O Delays. In: ACC 2011 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abdul Kadhar, K.M., Baskar, S. (2013). Non-fragile Robust PI Controller Design Using Co-variance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary Strategy. In: Panigrahi, B.K., Suganthan, P.N., Das, S., Dash, S.S. (eds) Swarm, Evolutionary, and Memetic Computing. SEMCCO 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8298. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03756-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03756-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03755-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03756-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)