Abstract
Starting from the integrated view presented in Figure 1, we have designed a cohesion graph (see 7.2 Cohesion-based Discourse Analysis) that was later on used to aggregate individual and collaborative learning through the underlying discourse structure. Without limiting the overall perspective, we opted here for focusing solely on ReaderBench, as it introduced the integrated cohesion-based analysis addressing both individual and collaborative learning, incorporating and refining nevertheless more functionalities than the other systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D.J., Labianca, G.: Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916), 892–895 (2009)
Cooper, A.: A Brief History of Analytics, Bolton, UK. CETIS Analytics Series, vol. 1 (2012)
Dascalu, M., Dessus, P., Trausan-Matu, Ş., Bianco, M., Nardy, A.: ReaderBench, an Environment for Analyzing Text Complexity and Reading Strategies. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS, vol. 7926, pp. 379–388. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Dascălu, M., Trausan-Matu, S., Dessus, P.: Towards an integrated approach for evaluating textual complexity for learning purposes. In: Popescu, E., Li, Q., Klamma, R., Leung, H., Specht, M. (eds.) ICWL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7558, pp. 268–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Emin, V., Pernin, J.-P., Guéraud, V.: Model and tool to clarify intentions and strategies in learning scenarios design. In: Cress, U., Dimitrova, V., Specht, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5794, pp. 462–476. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Emin, V., Pernin, J.-P., Prieur, M., Sanchez, E.: Stratégies d’élaboration, de partage et de réutilisation de scénarios pédagogiques. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education 4(2), 25–37 (2007)
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education 2(2-3), 87–105 (2000)
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet and Higher Education 13(1-2), 5–9 (2010)
Hansen, C., Emin, V., Wasson, B., Mor, Y., RodrÃguez-Triana, M.J., Dascalu, M., Ferguson, R., Pernin, J.-P.: Towards An Integrated Model of Teacher Inquiry into Student Learning, Learning Design, and Learning Analytics. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Ley, T., Klamma, R., Harrer, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8095, pp. 605–606. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Kienle, A., Wessner, M.: Analyzing and cultivating scientific communities of practice. International Journal of Web Based Communities 2(4), 377–393 (2006)
Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
McNamara, D.S., Graesser, A.C., Louwerse, M.M.: Sources of text difficulty: Across the ages and genres. In: Sabatini, J.P., Albro, E. (eds.) Assessing Reading in the 21st Century, p. 27. R&L Education, Lanham (in press)
Mor, Y., Craft, B.: Learning design: reflections on a snapshot of the current landscape. Research in Learning Technology 20 (2012)
Nistor, N., Dascalu, M., Trausan-Matu, S., Mihaila, D., Baltes, B., Smeaton, G.: Virtual Communities of Practice in Academia: Participation under the Influence of Technology Acceptance and Community Roles. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Ley, T., Klamma, R., Harrer, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8095, pp. 623–624. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Nistor, N., Dascalu, M., Trausan-Matu, S., Mihaila, D., Baltes, B., Smeaton, G.: Virtual Communities of Practice in Academia: Automated Analysis of Collaboration Based on the Social Knowledge-Building Model. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Ley, T., Klamma, R., Harrer, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8095, pp. 623–624. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Nistor, N., Fischer, F.: Communities of practice in academia: Testing a quantitative model. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1(2), 114–126 (2012)
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K.: Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research 74(4), 557–576 (2004)
Strijbos, J.W.: Assessment of (Computer-Supported) Collaborative Learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4(1), 59–73 (2011)
Tapiero, I.: Situation models and levels of coherence. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2007)
Wenger, E.: Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Zampa, V., Dessus, P.: Validating a computer-based tutor that promotes Self-Regulated Writing-to-Learn. In: Psaromiligkos, Y., Spyridakos, T., Retalis, S. (eds.) Evaluation in e-learning, pp. 159–172. Nova Publishers, New York (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dascalu, M. (2014). Discussions. In: Analyzing Discourse and Text Complexity for Learning and Collaborating. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 534. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03419-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03419-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03418-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03419-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)